

Qlik Replicate and SAS Data Management compete in the data integration and management category. Qlik Replicate seems to have an upper hand due to its strong real-time data integration and Change Data Capture capabilities.
Features: Qlik Replicate focuses on real-time data integration, Change Data Capture, and extensive connector support. It offers ELT capabilities for a streamlined data process. SAS Data Management emphasizes robust data integration with powerful data sorting, categorizing, summarizing features and comprehensive data management and analysis capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Qlik Replicate users wish for better user-friendliness, error reporting, support responsiveness, more transparent licensing, and enhanced API integration. SAS Data Management could benefit from simplified connectivity, improved stability, better documentation, and a less complex installation and management process.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Replicate offers flexible deployment options including public cloud, hybrid, and on-premises. However, its customer service experiences inconsistency with support delays and a focus on licensing issues. SAS Data Management is primarily on-premises and has unclear support processes, though it provides excellent assistance for specific issues.
Pricing and ROI: Qlik Replicate is considered costly, suitable for large enterprises but potentially expensive for smaller businesses. It offers significant ROI by lowering database usage and storage costs for real-time data operations. SAS Data Management is also expensive with less flexible pricing but delivers a comprehensive suite of tools that can provide valuable analytics and data management, supporting business insights and operational efficiencies.
I conducted a cost comparison with the AWS service provider, and this option is much cheaper than the Kinesis service offered by AWS.
Customers have seen ROI with Qlik Replicate because they get their data for analysis faster, enabling quicker decision-making compared to traditional data sourcing methods.
Even priority tickets, which should be resolved in minutes, can take days.
Having a technical account manager coordinate with us proved beneficial during these interactions.
Support response times could be improved as there are sometimes delays in receiving replies to support cases.
The support for SAS in Brazil is not the best one, but the support in Sweden is really good, as they visit the company and work to solve the issues.
The system could be scaled to include more sources and functions.
We successfully scaled several of our Oracle RDBMS systems simultaneously, including PeopleSoft HR and our network access request systems.
We have tracked INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE operations effectively, capturing pre-update and post-update images, maintaining real-time replicas of information without needing to reprocess requests or datasets.
I believe that having updated documentation is crucial as we encountered a scenario while going through documentation that had not been updated since 2024, which introduced risks since we rely on accurate documentation for task imports and endpoint re-credentialing considerations before reaching out to customer support.
It is a core-based licensing, which, especially in the banking industry, results in the system capacity being utilized up to a maximum of 60%.
Currently, there are limited transformations available in Qlik Replicate which could be expanded.
There is significant room for improvement, especially with regard to using a hybrid approach that involves both CAS and persistent storage.
For Qlik Replicate, the setup cost includes the requirement of a server, which represents the hardware cost that must be covered.
Licensing is calculated based on the machine's total capacity rather than actual usage.
From my experience, SAS Data Management is an expensive tool.
The log-based CDC engine of Qlik Replicate is the most valuable feature for us. It reads our source changes directly from the database log, providing a lightweight approach that ensures our databases, such as Oracle databases, are not burdened with additional queries.
This occurs in near real-time, with replication happening within seconds at the target location.
Data retrieved from the system can be pushed to multiple places, supporting various divisions such as marketing, loans, and others.
SAS Data Management stands out because of its data standardization, transformation, and verification capabilities.
The best features I appreciate about SAS Data Management tool are that it's easy to create the flows and schedule data, and the tables are not too big, making it easy to control the ETL process, including user access which is also easy to manage in SAS.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Qlik Replicate | 1.6% |
| SAS Data Management | 1.1% |
| Other | 97.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support.
Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.
Every decision, every business move, every successful customer interaction - they all come down to high-quality, well-integrated data. If you don't have it, you don't win. SAS Data Management is an industry-leading solution built on a data quality platform that helps you improve, integrate and govern your data.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.