No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Rapid7 Exposure Command vs Surface Command comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 Exposure Command
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
23rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (19th)
Surface Command
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
31st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of Rapid7 Exposure Command is 1.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Surface Command is 1.2%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Attack Surface Management (ASM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Rapid7 Exposure Command1.8%
Surface Command1.2%
Other97.0%
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
 

Featured Reviews

AK
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Automation has improved vulnerability insights and supports timely reporting for remediation teams
Rapid7 Exposure Command is not as easy to deploy compared to Qualys, and the detection rates are lower than Qualys. Rapid7 Exposure Command is not exactly complex, but it is medium complex when I compare it to Qualys, where the deployment procedure is quite straightforward. Detection needs more depth in Rapid7 Exposure Command, and when I compare it with Qualys, the output of vulnerabilities can be improved at a depth level. That is one of the major pieces of feedback I have. The detection rate of vulnerabilities is not up to par, and that is one of the most important things that every firm looks for.
Use Surface Command?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
11%
Construction Company
11%
Healthcare Company
11%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Construction Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Media Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Rapid7 Exposure Command?
Rapid7 Exposure Command is not as easy to deploy compared to Qualys, and the detection rates are lower than Qualys. Rapid7 Exposure Command is not exactly complex, but it is medium complex when I c...
What is your primary use case for Rapid7 Exposure Command?
I am specifically providing feedback on Rapid7 Exposure Command. We are using Rapid7 Exposure Command mostly for vulnerability detection and scanning.
What advice do you have for others considering Rapid7 Exposure Command?
Compared to Tenable or Qualys, Rapid7 Exposure Command is definitely affordable for small-sized or mid-sized engagements, although there are some challenges with detection. These challenges are in ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Noetic
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, TrendAI, Qualys and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM). Updated: May 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.