Safetica ONE vs Trellix DLP comparison

Safetica and Trellix are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Safetica is ranked #25, while Trellix is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.9. Safetica holds a 1.9% mindshare in DLP, compared to Trellix’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Safetica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Safetica ONE and Trellix DLP are competing in the data loss prevention category. Safetica ONE has the upper hand in pricing and support, while Trellix DLP is considered superior due to its robust features.

Features: Safetica ONE provides advanced data identification and classification, user activity monitoring, and integrated security solutions. Trellix DLP offers an extensive range of policies, granular control, and machine learning capabilities for intricate data protection.

Room for Improvement: Safetica ONE could enhance its machine learning capabilities, expand policy options, and increase scalability for larger enterprises. Trellix DLP can improve its deployment complexity, simplify its user interface, and offer more flexible pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Safetica ONE offers an intuitive deployment model with strong technical support for quick setup. Trellix DLP, although having a complex setup process, compensates with larger-scale support and comprehensive training.

Pricing and ROI: Safetica ONE is noted for its competitive setup cost, providing good ROI with its balanced pricing and features. Trellix DLP, while requiring a higher initial investment, justifies the cost with extensive protection and potential long-term savings from its advanced technology.

To learn more, read our detailed Safetica ONE vs. Trellix DLP Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Safetica ONE vs. Trellix DLP

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare One is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Safetica ONE is 1.9%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix DLP is 2.6%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Trellix DLP	2.6%
Cloudflare One	2.0%
Safetica ONE	1.9%
Other	93.5%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Cobe Van Coller

Network Architect at IP Dimension

Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites

I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.

Read full review

Sobaan Shamsi

Sales Attendant at Zoffec Infotech

A cost-effective solution that can be used for regulatory compliance, but its stability could be improved

ESET Safetica is a basic endpoint-level DLP solution that gives the basic functionality at the browser gateway or endpoint ESET Safetica is a cost-effective solution for customers who need a small quantity along with a competitive price. Users who want the solution for compliance are procuring…

Read full review

Madhav-Reddy

Senior SAP Basis Consultant at Cloudlink solutions

Has supported centralized management while needing improvements in feature depth

I have experience working with SentinelOne XDR, EDR, and XDR. Trellix DLP also offers EDR, XDR, and DLP solutions. The platform can be on the cloud, but the end users typically have their own devices installed with DLP on-premises. On a scale from one to ten, I rate Trellix DLP a seven.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cloudflare DDoS is better than its competitors for its security, deployment, and scalability."

"Cloudflare DDoS mitigates DDoS attacks."

"The blocking feature is very good."

"Using Cloudflare One makes my work quite easy because for DDoS protection, all I need to do is understand the OSI model and click; it makes it easier than trying to write a command line or use a Linux command."

"The best feature is rate limiting. If I'm expecting 500 visits per hour, Cloudflare will limit the requests if I suddenly get 50,000."

"Cloudflare Access is a stable solution."

"Cloudflare, in my opinion, was easy to implement."

"What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection."

More Cloudflare One pros

"The most valuable feature is the data classification."

"When you subscribe to the DLP, the system manages and protects your files well from the cloud."

"Safetica NXT provides you with an enterprise-quality data loss prevention system that anybody can pick up because the cost is low and it's easy to manage."

"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Safetica ONE is simple."

"ESET Safetica is a cost-effective solution for customers who need a small quantity along with a competitive price."

"The current version of the solution is stable...It is easy to scale the solution."

"The most valuable things about Safetica ONE are its comprehensive features, competitive pricing, and a strong focus on data security and compliance."

"Safetica ONE is easy to use and set up. We can set up rules and policies quickly."

More Safetica ONE pros

"Trellix can transfer the data through the cloud. The storage device control is an important feature."

"The tool has prebuilt templates for data classification. It is easier for customers to get started."

"The solution involves implementing the confidentiality, utility, and availability principles."

"The solution is stable and does not have glitching issues."

"The most effective aspect of Trellix DLP is that it does what it's supposed to do. It is fairly simple to use compared to Proofpoint."

"Trellix DLP offers many features, using EDR, EPP, disk encryption, and other features."

"Trellix DLP is a very good solution, easy to manage and handle, and newcomers find it user-friendly with an easy-to-use console and dashboard."

"It is a very stable solution."

More Trellix DLP pros

Cons

"Our customers no longer use Cloudflare because its service is subpar."

"Our subscription plan for the solution has a limitation of bot signatures."

"Feedback could be enhanced. While I work efficiently with Clover as a partner in Mexico City, sometimes the information and requests are easier to manage with more concrete solutions."

"The response time for support must be reduced."

"Cloudflare One is not very powerful, but for what we require, it is basic and sufficient."

"The initial onboarding was causing us some confusion."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform needs to improve its documentation. It took time to do the implementation."

"Feedback could be enhanced."

More Cloudflare One cons

"The product needs to improve support."

"The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection."

"ESET Safetica’s stability could be improved."

"Safetica ONE fails to support Linux."

"One area for improvement in Safetica is its firewall integration feature."

"There are some minor issues with the price and support of the solution that needs to be improved."

"This solution could be improved if it was available on Linux as well. Currently it can only be deployed on Mac and Windows."

"Safetica One has every other thing that you need, so I cannot give Safetica NXT a higher mark because it does not have the full features of the enterprise solutions."

"Coverage for Mac OS is lacking as features like clipboard and print protection don't function as expected. The agents often affect endpoint performance negatively and do not behave consistently across all machines."

"In future releases, I would like to see like to see encryption available on the cloud-based version."

"When cases are raised, partners perform initial L1 or L2 troubleshooting. However, ticket resolution times are often too long, with new engineers sometimes requesting the same logs repeatedly."

"Having someone within a region who understands the countries and how they approach data and information security is sometimes where the problem lies."

"Trellix is incompatible with Linux, and its DLP part is incompatible with Mac. Sometimes, it does not work on Windows, either."

"Virtualization is complex and requires proper training. However, once you get trained, it is a very good product."

"The whole UI of the server console installed on the standalone computers is hefty."

"The support team's response time during the night is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More Trellix DLP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"The prices are slightly expensive."

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."

"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."

"The solution is not that expensive."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."

"The licensing cost for this solution depends on the deal size and your use case. In our instance, it costs $35 per user per year. This is a reasonable price."

"The pricing for ESET Safetica is less as compared to other solutions. The customers have to pay only for the license."

"Safetica ONE is expensive."

"Customers need to pay for a yearly license per device."

"The pricing depends on the number of users in a company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

Pricing is competitive. Akamai is more expensive, in my view.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

In my opinion, Cloudflare One can be improved mainly through compatibility, as the integration should be much simpler...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

Cloudflare One's primary use case for my organization is to protect servers and to provide remote access with the VPN...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Trellix?

If I could add something, I think it would be even more advanced AI-driven anomaly detection. That way it could proac...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Trellix?

Trellix DLP is a very advanced level of DLP and a stable solution in the market, which serves both the enterprise seg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trellix DLP?

From my experience, the pricing was fairly competitive. The initial setup cost was moderate and the licensing is flex...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 4% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Twingate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

FortiSASE vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudflare One Competitors

Zecurion DLP vs Safetica ONE

Compared 12% of the time

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Safetica ONE

Compared 12% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Safetica ONE

Compared 9% of the time

Somansa DLP vs Safetica ONE

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Safetica ONE

Compared 4% of the time

More Safetica ONE Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Trellix DLP

Compared 10% of the time

SkyGuard DLP vs Trellix DLP

Compared 9% of the time

OPSWAT Proactive DLP vs Trellix DLP

Compared 8% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Trellix DLP

Compared 8% of the time

SearchInform DLP vs Trellix DLP

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix DLP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare One

June 2026

Download Cloudflare One product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

June 2026

Download Safetica ONE product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix DLP

May 2026

Download Trellix DLP product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform

No data available

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?

Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

Safetica ONE provides cost-effective, enterprise-level data protection tailored for SMBs. It offers efficient data classification and loss prevention, focusing on compliance and ease of use. Competing solutions like Falcon and Trend Micro tend to have higher costs.

Safetica ONE is designed to meet specific business needs, ensuring data security on endpoints and in the cloud without requiring extensive infrastructure. It is valuable for financial institutions needing compliance with regulations and supports document management projects by integrating user behavior analysis, data classification, and basic functionalities at the browser gateway. Despite its strengths, it requires faster technical support, enhanced stability, and improved firewall integration. The lack of Linux compatibility, vulnerability scanning capabilities, and Google Cloud Platform support are areas needing improvement. Corporations utilize it to protect files effectively, accommodating multiple users under one license for seamless device integration.

What features does Safetica ONE offer?

Data Leak Protection: Prevents unauthorized data sharing and ensures data remains within the organization.
Data Classification: Helps identify sensitive data and categorize it appropriately.
Data Loss Prevention: Protects against accidental or intentional data loss.
Ease of Use: Simple setup for rules and policies.
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable compared to similar solutions.

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

Security and Compliance: Offers enterprise-level protection meeting compliance standards.
Integration: Supports seamless integration across devices and platforms.
Efficiency: Quick setup and deployment minimizing resource use.
Scalability: Accommodates multiple users with a single license.

Safetica ONE is implemented by companies in data-sensitive industries like finance to adhere to guidelines and manage documents efficiently. They utilize its features to protect sensitive information on endpoints and assist in document management projects by ensuring data compliance and secure file protection, using the cloud for effective management without needing extensive infrastructure.

Safetica

Trellix DLP offers comprehensive data protection with advanced management features, ensuring compliance and data security across endpoints and networks. It integrates seamlessly into existing systems with centralized management for effective monitoring, data classification, and incident prevention.

Trellix DLP provides a robust data loss prevention platform that includes endpoint protection, web and network security, and customizable reporting through its centralized ePolicy Orchestrator. With machine learning capabilities, it enhances data classification and monitoring, ensuring protection across devices, cloud services, and applications. Trellix also supports compliance with security frameworks and integrates with third-party solutions, providing ease of installation via API services. Despite some areas needing improvement, such as support and Mac OS compatibility, Trellix remains a strong choice for organizations prioritizing data protection.

What Are Trellix DLP's Key Features?

Unified Console Management: Centralized control for data security operations
Data Classification: Prebuilt templates and custom integration for precise data categorization
Machine Learning: Enhances classification and monitoring through AI capabilities
Endpoint Protection: Comprehensive security for devices against unauthorized access
Advanced Reporting: Customizable options for detailed security insights

What Benefits Can Trellix DLP Users Expect?

Compliance Assurance: Meets industry security standards dynamically
Data Security: Protects sensitive information across multiple channels
Integration Flexibility: Seamless compatibility with third-party solutions
Installation Ease: Efficient setup via API services for quick deployment

In industries like manufacturing, Trellix DLP is used for incident monitoring and protection against data leaks, particularly of sensitive personal and financial information. Organizations benefit from its capabilities to block unauthorized uploads and monitor document movements effectively, while also leveraging its third-party integrations and application monitoring features for comprehensive data security measures.

Trellix

Sample Customers

23andMe

Mitsubishi Motors, Canon

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Safetica ONE vs. Trellix DLP

June 2026

Free Report: Safetica ONE vs. Trellix DLP

Find out what your peers are saying about Safetica ONE vs. Trellix DLP and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Safetica ONE vs. Trellix DLP report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.