Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SAP Strategic Enterprise Management [EOL] vs Sage Intacct comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Sage Intacct
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Financial Performance and Strategy Management (1st), Billing Software (4th), Cloud ERP (5th), Subscription Management Software (3rd), Financial Close Software (2nd), Accounts Payable Automation Software (2nd), AI Security (7th), AI Finance & Accounting (3rd)
SAP Strategic Enterprise Ma...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Sushant S - PeerSpot reviewer
Sage Intacct Technical Consultant at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
Has reduced manual effort through customization and streamlined API-based integrations
The best features Sage Intacct offers include the import functionality, support for customization, and the platform that allows me to modify whatever I want. The triggers and reports are built very well and user-friendly, so I can modify this, and this is one of the best features it provides. The import functionality helps because once I download the template from Sage Intacct, I can fill out the specific columns with the data that I need to import into the system, and it will do the work instead of adding those details manually. The platform services allow me to add functionalities such as sending an email once I generate any AP bill or approve vendors. Additionally, I can call external API services or Sage Intacct API to validate those fields, which is good for users. Sage Intacct has positively impacted my organization through improved collaboration and saved time. I can import data easily, and since it is user-friendly, I encounter fewer errors. For example, the work I used to do in one or two days now gets completed in one or two hours.
Use SAP Strategic Enterprise Management [EOL]?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Financial Performance and Strategy Management solutions are best for your needs.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise6
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Sage Intacct?
While Sage Intact is a strong financial management platform, there are areas that could be improved. The user interface can feel complex for new users, especially during initial setup and customiza...
What is your primary use case for Sage Intacct?
I have been using Sage Intacct for over three years. My main use case for Sage Intacct is mostly managing accounts payable. Specifically in Sage Intacct, I process payments, post the bills, and mai...
What advice do you have for others considering Sage Intacct?
Organizations considering Sage Intacct should invest time in proper planning and training before implementation. Clearly defining reporting and workflow requirements early will help maximize the pl...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Intacct
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cornerstone Information Systems
T¾V Rheinland, Pacific Drilling S.A., Fire & Rescue New South Wales, Tussengemeentelijke Maatschappij der Vlaanderen voor Watervoorziening, Frankfurt Airport, New Zealand Department of Conservation, Bernalillo County
Find out what your peers are saying about Sage, Oracle, SAP and others in Financial Performance and Strategy Management. Updated: January 2026.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.