SAP Data Hub [EOL] vs SAP PowerDesigner comparison

Why PeerSpot?

SAP Data Hub [EOL] and SAP PowerDesigner are both solutions in the Metadata Management category. Additionally, 66% of SAP Data Hub [EOL] users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of SAP PowerDesigner users who would recommend it.

SAP Data Hub [EOL]

Read 3 SAP Data Hub [EOL] reviews

66% willing to recommend

SAP PowerDesigner

Read 40 SAP PowerDesigner reviews

7,910 Views
1,107 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

SAP Data Hub [EOL]

SAP PowerDesigner

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 15, 2026

SAP PowerDesigner and SAP Data Hub [EOL] compete in the data management tools category. PowerDesigner holds the upper hand in pricing and support, while Data Hub [EOL] has a stronger feature set.

Features: SAP PowerDesigner offers robust data modeling capabilities, comprehensive database support, and architecture management features. It excels in conceptual, logical, and physical data modeling. SAP Data Hub [EOL] integrates diverse data sources, streamlines data processes, and manages data pipelines efficiently. Its strength lies in handling large data tasks across platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP PowerDesigner provides a straightforward on-premise deployment model with minimal technical challenges. Its customer service is valued for responsiveness and efficiency. SAP Data Hub [EOL] offers a cloud-based or hybrid approach, increasing flexibility but potentially adding setup complexity. Its support is known for expertise but may have longer response times.

Pricing and ROI: SAP PowerDesigner presents a more cost-effective setup with a lower initial investment and quicker ROI for data modeling solutions. SAP Data Hub [EOL] entails a higher setup cost due to its advanced data processing capabilities, yielding significant returns for extensive data integration needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Metadata Management Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Metadata Management

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP Data Hub [EOL]

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP PowerDesigner

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (2nd), Metadata Management (6th)

Featured Reviews

Vijaya Macherla

GTM Lead at Capgemini

The solution is seamless, but the database sometimes leads to confusion

We used to have multiple different kinds of databases, which internally, had different compliance levels. Retention management is very different now. If the policy is live and the claim has been completed, I couldn't archive the claim. I needed to keep a reference integrity of that claim and understand which policy paid out the claim. With this solution, the policy came in six months ago and qualified for archiving. The claim had been paid and in every environment, the claim had been closed, including the reporting system, the claims system, etc. With the payment set gateway, I can just go and archive. But, we had a hard time during this process. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

HemantKUMAR6

Principal Architect at Sopra Steria

Customer support has delayed successful upgrade to supported version

It was a long time back when my company purchased it, but I am now participating in upgrading it to the latest version. I found customer support to be tedious during the upgrade process to the latest version. I tried to upgrade to a trial version before purchasing a new license. During that process, I had some technical issues. When trying to go from 12.5 to 16.5, I could migrate but faced technical challenges. When I approached customer support, they informed me that even 16.5 is not supported. They stated I would need to go to 16.7 before they could look at my issue. They didn't spend any time on the issue because according to them, 16.5 is not supported. Until I get 16.7 and complete the migration, I'm not getting any help from them. I was not too happy with the customer support. This was my only interaction with customer support, and I haven't received any resolution to my issue. It can be rated as low as zero because that's the only time I approached them. I cannot even say zero out of ten because I approached only once. Perhaps they are correct that they don't support 16.5, so they don't want to spend any time on that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the S/4HANA 1909 On-Premise"

"Having this solution enables us to approach our clients to upgrade their databases, and we upgrade them according to their business requirements."

"Its connection to on-premise products is the most valuable. We mostly use the on-premise connection, which is seamless. This is what we prefer in this solution over other solutions. We are using it the most for the orchestration where the data is coming from different categories. Its other features are very much similar to what they are giving us in open source. Their push-down approach is the most advantageous, where they push most of the processing on to the same data source. This means that they have a serverless kind of thing, and they don't process the data inside a product such as Data Hub. They process the data from where the data is coming out. If it is coming from HANA, to capture the data or process it for analytics, orchestration, or management, they go to the HANA database and give it out. They don't process it on Data Hub. This push-down approach increases the processing speed a little bit because the data is processed where it is sitting. That's the best part and an advantage. I have used another product where they used to capture the data first and then they used to process it and give it. In Data Hub, it is in reverse. They process it first and give it, and then they put their own manipulations. They lead in terms of business functions. No other solution has business functions already implemented to perform business analysis. They have a lot of prebuilt business functions for machine learning and orchestration, which we can use directly to get an analysis out from the existing data. Most of the data is sitting as enterprise data there. That's a major advantage that they have."

"They lead in terms of business functions, and no other solution has business functions already implemented to perform business analysis, with a lot of prebuilt business functions for machine learning and orchestration that we can use directly to get an analysis out from the existing enterprise data."

"SAP is one of the most seamless ERPs that have integrated SAP archiving within Excel. I have not seen this with any other database."

"It is more flexible than other tools and user-friendly, making it easy to adapt."

"It offers a lot of features in one solution, and you would have to get multiple other products to bundle together all of the capabilities that you get in just this product."

"Technical support is good... for a price."

"The most valuable feature is that it is a very fast reverse engineering process. It does a very expansive comparison."

"By using SAP PowerDesigner, we are able to create a product that is always up to date, so the model always represents the implementation."

"In summary, this product gives you all of the features that a modeler would require to produce both logical and physical data models."

"Provides the flexibility to create logical and conceptual data models."

"One of the key reasons for choosing this solution above others is because of the repository features which we're able to consolidate and work on a single repository where we store all our models in one location."

More SAP PowerDesigner pros

Cons

"The company has everything offshore."

"In 2018, connecting it to outside sources, such as IoT products or IoT-enabled big data Hadoop, was a little complex. It was not smooth at the beginning. It was unstable. It took a lot of time for the initial data load. Sometimes, the connection broke, and we had to restart the process, which was a major issue, but they might have improved it now. It is very smooth with SAP HANA on-premise system, SAP Cloud Platform, and SAP Analytics Cloud. It could be because these are their own products, and they know how to integrate them. With Hadoop, they might have used open-source technologies, and that's why it was breaking at that time. They are providing less embedded integration because they want us to use their other products. For example, they don't want to go and remove SAP Analytics Cloud and put everything in Data Hub. They want us to use SAP Analytics Cloud somewhere else and not inside the Data Hub. On the integration part, it lacks real-time analytics, and it is slow. They should embed the SAP Analytics Cloud inside Data Hub or support some kind of analysis. They do provide some analysis, but it is not extensive. They are moreover open source. So, we need a lot of developers or data scientists to go in and implement Python algorithms. It would be better if they can provide their own existing algorithms and give some connections and drop-down menus to go and just configure those. It will make things really quick by increasing the embedded integrations. It will also improve the process efficiency and processing power. Its performance needs improvement. It is a little slow. It is not the best in the market, and there are other products that are much better than this. In terms of technology and performance, it is a little slow as compared to Microsoft and other data orchestration products. I haven't used other products, but I have read about those products, their settings, and the milliseconds that they do. In Azure Purview, they say that they can copy, manage, or transform the data within milliseconds. They say that they can transform 100 gigabytes of data within three to five seconds, which is something SAP cannot do. It generally takes a lot of time to process that much amount of data. However, I have never tested out Azure."

"Its performance needs improvement. It is a little slow. It is not the best in the market, and there are other products that are much better than this."

"Nowadays there are some inconsistencies in data bases, however, they upgrade and release the versions to market."

"You have the possibility to complete a connection for abbreviations if you are creating columns or names of the tables. In the Citrix environment, this has been lagging to the point where the PowerDesigner was not usable."

"SAP PowerDesigner could improve by making the repository easier to understand. It is difficult to understand how the repository works because when I used logical models as part of the team, we wanted to use them together and update the older versions of the data model version but it was confusing. The repository needs to be explained."

"There should be a better usage of current hardware including multicore CPUs, higher resolutions (UHD, 4K), and multiple displays."

"There are some minor things that could be easier. We're writing up procedures to bring all the modeling back into one group as this reduces delays in production."

"One issue is the cost, as it is a high-priced tool coming from SAP."

"I would like SAP to prove free licenses to professionals that are using the solution. The free version is limited."

"SAP PowerDesigner can improve the ease of use. It is not the best tool on the market because it is tough to navigate and use. A beginner would not be able to use it well, it requires some experience. If the solution was more user-friendly it would be able to be used by more audiences. I do not think many people are aware of this solution and they should use it."

"The focus is more on mainstream development environments, and I see a lack of focus on the open source world. I think SAP PowerDesigner probably interfaces better with SQL Server and Db2 but not with open source databases like PostgreSQL and MySQL."

More SAP PowerDesigner cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The Cloud is very expensive, but SAP HANA previous service is okay."

"I bought the software outright and do not pay a licensing fee."

"When you purchase the license for SAP PowerDesigner, you have to buy one year of support. The tool is worth the money."

"The price of the solution is low."

"PowerDesigner is not the cheapest solution on the market, so make sure that you are using it to its full potential."

"The ROI has been 43%."

"I would like SAP to prove free licenses to professionals that are using the solution. The free version is limited."

"The pricing varies based on functionality and users."

"Regarding costs, SAP PowerDesigner is pricey, as I've heard from my team manager, which is why the company has been thinking of bringing another solution on board."

More SAP PowerDesigner pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Metadata Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

22%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP PowerDesigner?

The pricing of SAP PowerDesigner is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP PowerDesigner?

Synchronization is vital since I experience multiple problems, such as mismatched models and manual DDL handling. Improving the synchronization between models and databases can enhance integration ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP PowerDesigner?

I use SAP PowerDesigner for data modeling, which greatly enhances the clarity of my data management processes. I manage data across multiple databases, including cloud databases, Teradata, and Orac...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs SAP Data Hub [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Collibra Platform vs SAP Data Hub [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAP Data Hub [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

SAS Data Management vs SAP Data Hub [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Cloud Private for Data vs SAP Data Hub [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP Data Hub [EOL] Competitors

erwin Data Modeler vs SAP PowerDesigner

Compared 50% of the time

erwin Evolve vs SAP PowerDesigner

Compared 5% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs SAP PowerDesigner

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Information Steward vs SAP PowerDesigner

Compared 3% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAP PowerDesigner

Compared 3% of the time

More SAP PowerDesigner Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

September 2026

Download SAP Data Hub [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP PowerDesigner

August 2026

Download SAP PowerDesigner product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sybase PowerDesigner

Overview

The SAP® Data Hub solution enables sophisticated data operations management. It gives you the capability and flexibility to connect enterprise data and Big Data and gain a deep understanding of data and information processes across sources and systems throughout the distributed landscape. The unified solution provides visibility and control into data opportunities, integrating cloud and on-premise information and driving data agility and business value. Distributed processing power enables greater speed and efficiency.

SAP

SAP PowerDesigner is a versatile data modeling tool known for its comprehensive support of conceptual, logical, and physical models. It aids in process analysis, data governance, and IT architecture design.

SAP PowerDesigner provides robust data modeling capabilities, offering tools that enable standardization, reverse engineering, lineage analysis, and impact assessments. Its flexibility comes from its ability to customize functions to fit diverse business requirements. With support for multiple databases and features for IT architecture design, it is widely used for data governance, management, and process modeling. However, challenges exist with synchronization, integration, and version control, along with high pricing and limited cloud options. The platform needs improvement in its repository efficiency, integration with open-source technologies, and NoSQL database support.

What are the key features of SAP PowerDesigner?

Data Modeling: Supports conceptual, logical, and physical models across databases.
Reverse Engineering: Allows for the analysis and redesign of existing systems.
Lineage Analysis: Tracks data flow for better understanding and management.
Customizability: Offers extensive customization to meet diverse business needs.
IT Architecture Design: Tools available for designing IT infrastructures.

What benefits should be expected from SAP PowerDesigner?

Improved Data Governance: Enhances clarity in data management.
Standardization: Helps standardize processes and data tracking.
Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork and communication across projects.
Adaptability: Flexibility to fit various business applications like database design and process modeling.

SAP PowerDesigner is implemented across industries for tasks like data warehousing in Oracle, Teradata, and cloud setups, supporting business analysis, migration, and database design. It enhances automated documentation, governance, and process modeling, used widely for its data injection, reverse-engineering, and reporting capabilities.

SAP

Sample Customers

Kaeser Kompressoren, HARTMANN

Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone

Find out what your peers are saying about Collibra, Informatica, Alation and others in Metadata Management. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Metadata Management vendors.

We monitor all Metadata Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.