Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SAP Master Data Governance vs Stibo STEP MDM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SAP Master Data Governance
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Master Data Management (MDM) Software (1st)
Stibo STEP MDM
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Data Integration and Access solutions, they serve different purposes. SAP Master Data Governance is designed for Master Data Management (MDM) Software and holds a mindshare of 21.5%, down 23.0% compared to last year.
Stibo STEP MDM, on the other hand, focuses on Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions, holds 8.6% mindshare, up 7.8% since last year.
Master Data Management (MDM) Software
Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions
 

Featured Reviews

UdayReddy - PeerSpot reviewer
Detailed technical support and data integration capabilities create seamless user experience
Regarding SAP Master Data Governance, there is significant room for improvement particularly concerning the replication types. For example, when a vendor master is created in Ariba and a request is submitted from the Ariba system, SAP Ariba directs it to MDG. MDG verifies the details entirely through PI/PO or CPI. Once MDG verifies the data, the request is submitted to the S/4HANA system, the target. After a final approval at all levels, the vendor number is generated, and the vendor code gets passed from source to target system. This number is available in both the Ariba integration in the systems and in SAP BPT code, as well as the S/4HANA system.
RahulSoni - PeerSpot reviewer
Modular design, product-based MDM and easy to setup
Stibo is a great product if you want to utilize it in product-based MDM. Customer-base, they are still growing, but product-base is fine because every single time you have to create hierarchies in the product and not care about all the other stuff. But the major thing is the hierarchy, at which particular type that product is and what that product does, how it looks, what is the catalog, what are the relationships with other stuff. So, from that note, Stibo is great. Around 20 to 25 people were there when I was on a particular project. I knew around 20 to 25 people who knew Stibo MDM and were part of it.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product is easy to use and is beneficial from a data governance perspective."
"Some of the features that I have found to be beneficial are the search and uploads functions."
"Validates all aspects from security to authorization and authentication."
"This is an all-around good product."
"I am satisfied with the solution's customer service."
"SAP Master Data Governance integrates well."
"We've managed tens of thousands of updates within 30 to 60 minutes, and we can also replicate these changes to all connected systems."
"We've found the solution to be quite flexible."
"Data profiling allows us to recognize values from our upstream applications. It helps us place limits on the creation of new data domains to organize the ecosystem. The golden record, crucial for downstream applications, ensures data integrity and consistency."
"The match engine is very good and the BPM solution is very good as well."
"It's powerful and it's stable."
"It's very user friendly, and we can do everything in one place."
"The second feature I love is its modular design, where you can create a certain number of entities and create hierarchical entities."
 

Cons

"The user experience can be improved."
"Bill of materials (BOM) creation in manufacturing needs to be enhanced in SAP Master Data Governance."
"There were challenges with handling multiple values within a single input field at the screen level."
"The documentation provided for the MDG extensions by Utopia could be improved."
"RiverFront is a more modern and cost-effective solution compared to MDG. It is flexible and designed to handle big data, which MDG does not support well."
"The UI could improve by being more neat and clean. Sometimes users find it difficult to use it."
"Lacks some features that are available in other solutions."
"The multidomain MDM feature is based on EIP systems, which may not be a good model for all master data."
"There is scope for improvement with regard to the UI."
"The search feature for searching internal records could be improved."
"The customer service and support were a little adamant about giving workarounds rather than accepting that something was not working correctly."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The analytics module can be improved. It is a self-service solution for creating new reports and submitting visions to bring more data to the CEO table."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is too expensive."
"The cost of the product is not ideal."
"We have an enterprise license. The whole SAP landscape pricing model is based on the number of users, and the number of transactions. The price could be better, there is always room for improvement in the price."
"The pricing is a bit too high."
"I rate the tool's pricing a seven out of ten."
"The cloud solution is subscription-based, it is paid monthly or quarterly. If the solution is on-premises, it is a one-time fee. As far as I am aware there are no additional costs."
"The licensing cost is reasonable."
"SAP Master Data Governance is an expensive product."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
14%
Retailer
11%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP Master Data Governance?
We've managed tens of thousands of updates within 30 to 60 minutes, and we can also replicate these changes to all connected systems.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Master Data Governance?
The challenge with SAP MDG is not only the cost but the resources. The skills required are niche in the market, and while you can purchase the product either one time or on a subscription basis, th...
What needs improvement with SAP Master Data Governance?
Regarding SAP Master Data Governance, there is significant room for improvement particularly concerning the replication types. For example, when a vendor master is created in Ariba and a request is...
What needs improvement with Stibo STEP MDM?
Stibo needs to make it way much more efficient in the integration of the data. When you insert data, if you're not utilizing StepXML, the data load will take a lot of time. They can utilize direct ...
What is your primary use case for Stibo STEP MDM?
Our use case is based on the master data profile for customers and certain regulatory instances specific to Brazil. We used Stibo STEP MDM to create and manage the records for these datasets.
 

Also Known As

SAP MDG
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Convergent IS, CHIO Aachen, Dell, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), City of Boston, Mozzart, Mitsui Knowledge Industry (MKI), AOK Bundesverband, eBay
Sears Canada, Best Buy, Oriental Trading
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Master Data Governance vs. Stibo STEP MDM and other solutions. Updated: July 2022.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.