

SCSM and Zendesk compete in the IT service management category. Zendesk often has the upper hand due to its focus on user-friendliness and multi-channel customer engagement capabilities.
Features: SCSM stands out with its integration with Microsoft products, advanced configuration management, and robust support for ITIL processes like incident and change management. Zendesk excels in ticket management, provides a highly customizable agent workflow, and offers extensive integration with SaaS applications and tools.
Room for Improvement: SCSM needs improvements in user-friendliness, reporting customization, and non-Microsoft product integration. Zendesk can improve its email handling, customization for reports, and make multi-brand management more intuitive.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SCSM requires intensive on-premises deployment but has good cloud integration options with Microsoft. Zendesk, with its cloud deployment, offers quick setup and scalability, with generally responsive support that may need enhancement in complex technical issues.
Pricing and ROI: SCSM offers competitive pricing within Microsoft's licensing agreements; however, ROI is best for those heavily invested in Microsoft's ecosystem. Zendesk's pricing involves per-agent fees, which can be costly, but delivers a strong ROI by enhancing customer satisfaction and efficiency.
I can tell you that we probably saved at least three employees full-time with the ticket management and the automation and the macros and the user follow-up being built in.
Time saved is definitely a benefit because it puts all of our tickets in one spot.
I feel that Zendesk helped us set up our platform for providing support way faster than other platforms due to its easy configuration.
Response times are slow, and engineers often lack the necessary product knowledge.
When we get up to Microsoft, I would rate it an eight or nine.
There appears to be a lack of connection between the bot and the agents, making it feel scripted rather than helpful.
The technical support provided by Zendesk has been very satisfactory.
Their support team from Zendesk is excellent, similar to what you have in Freshdesk.
From an admin point of view, Intune has more features and is easier to manage.
We have not hit a peak or a turn yet that Zendesk has not been able to go with us or been able to grow with us in the process, change or pivot that the company is making.
Zendesk can scale from very small companies to very large ones.
Zendesk's scalability is excellent.
The SCSM is stable.
They are always informing us with a status update and an ETA, and the turnaround time is usually within the same day with no extended downtime that would cause a detriment to our company.
Zendesk is quite stable; we experience major outages only once or twice a year, making it very reliable.
The stability has been quite reliable.
From an admin point of view, Intune has more features and is easier to manage compared to SCCM.
We have to always try to hire some maintenance hours from external companies to fix small things that maybe would be faster if we could get it in-house, but because of the lack of information, we lose a lot of time solving some small problems.
Zendesk could actually support HTML on the tickets so we could format our text better than the current options such as size, bold, italic, or underscored, because the text processing is too simple.
Zendesk is missing an AI aspect that could help provide quick answers based on the knowledge housed within the platform.
Zendesk is amazing, and because they are always working on a new upgrade or a new integration, they are very forward-thinking from an engineering perspective.
It is not the cheapest solution nor the most expensive, but it provides value for money.
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Zendesk was quite expensive.
SCCM provides remote tool functionality, which is not in Intune.
If it is correctly configured, you can access and give service quickly to all the end users.
It allows us to handle more support cases with fewer people due to its advanced artificial intelligence capabilities.
Zendesk is way cheaper than other ITSM platforms such as ServiceNow, providing a good platform at a lower price so we could offer good support with a low budget for the license.
Being able to put response counters on certain tickets and have certain ones that are high priority and have a tighter SLA than lower priority items, being able to categorize them as a question versus an urgent request, and being able to bucket them as feature requests or product enhancements.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Zendesk | 5.1% |
| SCSM | 1.9% |
| Other | 93.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 36 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Zendesk Support is intuitive, and it's built with support agents in mind. Everything they need lives in a single, dynamic help desk interface so it's easy to be productive and manage customer interactions.
We monitor all Help Desk Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.