Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Siebel vs TOA Technologies ETAdirect [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Siebel
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Field Service Management (5th), Order Management Hubs (10th), Product Configuration and Quoting (9th)
TOA Technologies ETAdirect ...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

it_user495873 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Architect at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
I like the assignment management and contact management features. I would like them to extend the possibility for functional segregation.
Extending the possibility for functional segregation would allow us to decentralize certain functions between different areas. In our organization, the administration of users (or executives who access the system) is done by an area. The management of executive skills is performed by another area, according to the current Siebel. These roles should not be independent.
Use TOA Technologies ETAdirect [EOL]?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Field Service Management solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
ETAdirect
 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Hover Automotive India, Smiles, Bouygues Telecom, Abu Dhabi Judicial Department, Lawn Tennis Association Boosts Tennis, Southwest Airlines
Virgin Media, Cox Communications
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, IFS, Freshworks and others in Field Service Management. Updated: February 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.