SolarWinds ipMonitor vs Zabbix comparison

"IPAM is used for IP address reservation and tracking, helping us easily identify live IP addresses."

"IPAM is used for IP address reservation and tracking, helping us easily identify live IP addresses."

"The most valuable feature is the availability of end devices."

"Zabbix is fully scalable, with no limitations in that regard."

"Its overall flexibility is most valuable. When our customers have some custom applications that are not necessarily covered by the community or a standard monitoring tool, we use Zabbix to build our own modules with our own templates. This feature has been useful in using Zabbix for infrastructure and IT monitoring. It has also been useful for industrial equipment monitoring. Zabbix is very lightweight. It is efficient in terms of performance because it doesn't use a lot of resources."

"Zabbix is very easy to implement."

"I'm supervising all the IT departments, and Zabbix seems quite good for them. It provides graphics and information in real time. We get alerts about crashes on the system, enabling us to quickly repair issues. We can easily find devices with problems."

"We use Zabbix to monitor our organization's IT infrastructure and workstations. We don't use Microsoft Intune since it's expensive. The tool's real-time alerting system has proved crucial for us, particularly when a new device joins a network that is not one of our own devices. It notifies us about the presence of this new device, allowing us to investigate further. Additionally, it alerts us about disk usage, memory usage, and the software installed on the machine."

"Zabbix has a roadmap and they are continuously and frequently adding new features."

"The overall functionality of Zabbix is very good. The monitoring of bank applications that Zabbix provides is great. The information is displayed on a dashboard that is easily viewed."

"We use it to monitor and manage our servers."

"The licensing cost is high compared to open source tools."

"The licensing cost is high compared to open source tools."

"The solution does not include enough features and has some performance issues."

"Zabbix claims that there is an auto-discovery process but my team member was facing difficulty and was told that it's not really automatic, and there are some manual steps."

"The GUI could be more intuitive. Also, we'd like streaming telemetry. Zabbix might have this feature, but I haven't seen it yet. It took us a long time to get started because the documentation isn't very descriptive. We had to go through various sources like YouTube and forums to get this solution working."

"The product could be more secure and more stable."

"The reports are not great and should be improved."

"Having a more customizable interface and dashboard would be an improvement."

"The System Center Operations Manager can be improved."

"There's a small module of APM, however, it is not an enhanced version. People usually ask for a full-fledged APM solution."

"The performance reporting could be improved."

"The solution is a bit expensive because the annual license does not include new features that are priced as add-ons."

"We are using the free, open-source version."

"We pay the subscription for support by year."

"Zabbix is free but if you use it in production then you have to pay for it."

"Its licensing is fair. It seems to be much cheaper than others."

"Zabbix is a free solution but the support contact costs money."

"There is no license but we need to pay for support."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"The tool's licensing is good."