SonarQube vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

SonarSource Sàrl and Black Duck are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Additionally, 84% of SonarSource Sàrl users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Black Duck users who would recommend it.

SonarQube

Read 139 SonarQube reviews

43,089 Views
31,886 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Synopsys API Security Testi...

Read 1 Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

SonarQube

Synopsys API Security Testi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2025

SonarQube and Synopsys API Security Testing are competing products in code quality and security testing. SonarQube is noted for its pricing and support, whereas Synopsys stands out for its advanced features and perceived value, making it a strong contender for enterprises seeking comprehensive security functionalities.

Features: SonarQube provides robust code analysis, continuous inspection, and support for a wide range of programming languages. Synopsys API Security Testing offers detailed API vulnerability detection, dynamic security assessment, and is focused on API security testing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube offers an intuitive deployment model with strong community backing. Synopsys API Security Testing, while more complex, provides dedicated support and consultancy services, focusing on enterprises with specialized assistance needs.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube typically involves lower setup costs with positive ROI attributed to improved code quality. Synopsys API Security Testing requires higher initial investments but promises substantial ROI based on its specialized security capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SonarQube

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

139

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (1st), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Synopsys API Security Testi...

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Vitthal Gole

Devops Engineer at AIQOD

Automated code checks have improved quality gates and prevent weak code from reaching production

SonarQube could improve by reducing false positives in its static code analysis; while its detection capabilities are strong, some findings require manual verification, increasing developers' workload. More accurate analysis would enhance productivity, and SonarQube would benefit from enhanced AI-powered recommendations for fixing issues. For instance, in our pipeline, if it fails during SonarQube stage, we could check the dashboard for identified issues involving code smells, bugs, or duplicacy. An AI feature should be integrated into SonarQube to resolve issues quickly; optimizing scanning performance for very large repositories and providing faster analysis times would enhance the developer experience, especially in large code bases with frequent commits. For anyone planning to implement SonarQube, I advise starting by defining coding standards first and integrating Quality Gates into the pipeline. You can customize quality profiles to match project requirements; rather than relying entirely on default rules, you can adjust settings for stronger detection and enforcement. Organizations with advanced security, branch analysis, and governance features might consider commercial editions based on their needs.

Read full review

UmarQureshi

Security Lead at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Useful threat vectors, beneficial results, but implementation needed support

We are using Synopsys API Security Testing for scanning APIs for risks and vulnerabilities and to understand our posture before deployment within our business The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares. I have been…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The web interface is very good."

"I like the by-default policies that are they, as they seem to cover most of what I need."

"SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is very stable."

"It automatically scans for code, detects vulnerabilities, and generates daily reports."

"The reports from SonarCloud are very good."

"One of the most valuable features of SonarQube is its ability to detect code quality during development. There are rules that define various technologies—Java, C#, Python, everything—and these rules declare the coding standards and code quality. With SonarQube, everything is detectable during the time of development and continuous integration, which is an advantage. SonarQube also has a Quality Gate, where the code should reach 85%. Below that, the code cannot be promoted to a further environment, it should be in a development environment only. So the checks are there, and SonarQube will provide that increase. It also provides suggestions on how the code can be fixed and methods of going about this, without allowing hackers to exploit the code. Another valuable feature is that it is tightly integrated with third-party tools. For example, we can see the SonarQube metrics in Bitbucket, the code repository. Once I raise the full request, the developer, team lead, or even the delivery lead can see the code quality metrics of the deliverable so that they can make a decision. SonarQube will also cover all of the top OWASP vulnerabilities, however it doesn't have penetration testing or hacker testing. We use other tools, like Checkmarx, to do penetration testing from the outside."

"Using SonarQube benefits us because we are able to avoid the inclusion of malware in our applications."

"It is a very good tool for analysis despite its limitations."

More SonarQube pros

"The technical support from Synopsys API Security Testing is amazing."

"The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares."

Cons

"I see a problem with SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) because the vulnerability assessment is continuous; if I fix some vulnerabilities today, they reappear in the next scan, and there will be completely different issues that need to be fixed."

"I would like to see more options for security, beyond the basics like SQL injection."

"The BPM language is important and should be considered in SonarQube."

"The handling of the contents of Docker container images could be better."

"SonarQube's detail in the security could be improved. It may be helpful to have additional details, with regards to Oracle PL/SQL. For example, it's neither as built nor as thorough as Java. For now, this is the only additional feature I would like to see."

"It's a bit expensive for us. The currency rate of the dollar is a problem but it may be fine for other countries."

"That being said, there are better solutions in the market when it comes to SAST scanning."

"We called support and complained but have not received any information as we use the free version. We had to fix it on our own and could not escalate it to the tool's developer."

More SonarQube cons

"The solution required us to use our team and we spoke to Synopsys API Security Testing's support to do the implementation. We use two people from our team for the implementation. and one person for maintenance."

"We haven't covered all the areas yet in our business. It's still being scaled up within the organization. We've probably covered 10 percent of the business. I don't think we've seen a proper ROI yet."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SonarQube price is a little bit higher than Kiuwan's. Kiuwan also gives a little bit of flexibility in terms of pricing."

"I use the full trial version of SonarQube."

"I think comparing the product to competitors it should be less expensive."

"The costs for this application, for the kind of job it does, are pretty decent."

"As a user and a consumer of this solution, it can be pricey for my company to support and use, even though there are many benefits. For this reason, we use the free version. In the future, as our product cycles develop and evolve at a more steady pace, we hope to invest in the licensing for this tool."

"I am satisfied with the pricing."

"The product’s price is lower than Veracode’s price."

"I requested this license for one million lines of code and they accepted this."

More SonarQube pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	45
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	81

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs SonarQube

Compared 9% of the time

Snyk vs SonarQube

Compared 4% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube

Compared 3% of the time

Coverity Static vs SonarQube

Compared 2% of the time

More SonarQube Competitors

Invicti vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]

Compared 25% of the time

Invicti Web + API vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Aikido Security vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Seeker Interactive vs Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

More Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube

October 2026

Download SonarQube product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] report

Download Synopsys API Security Testing [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Sonar, SonarQube Cloud

No data available

Interactive Demo

SonarSource Sàrl

Demo not available

Black Duck

Overview

SonarQube leads automated code review, enhancing code quality and security in AI-driven SDLCs. It analyzes pull requests, providing developers with actionable feedback and AI-driven fixes before code merges. Trusted by top enterprises, it supports SaaS and self-managed deployments.

SonarQube supports a wide range of programming languages and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools like Jenkins. It is renowned for its static code analysis, code coverage, and security vulnerability detection. While its open-source foundation and scalability are praised, users seek enhanced integration across multiple languages, better security features, and improved documentation. Despite challenges, its ability to automate code inspections and ensure compliance with coding standards makes it essential in software development processes, facilitating continuous improvement.

What are the most important features?

Language Support: Extensive support for multiple programming languages.
Custom Coding Rules: Allows defining project-specific rules.
Integration: Seamlessly works with Jenkins and CI/CD pipelines.
Quality Gates: Simplifies monitoring code quality.
Dashboards: Facilitates easy monitoring and management.
Static Code Analysis: Detects issues early in development.
Security Detection: Identifies vulnerabilities automatically.

What benefits should users look for?

Improved Code Quality: Enhances reliability and maintainability.
Security Assurance: Strengthens code against vulnerabilities.
Technical Debt Reduction: Ensures cleaner, maintainable code.
Efficient Feedback: Speeds up development cycles.
Standards Compliance: Aids in adhering to best practices.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and automotive, SonarQube is leveraged for static code analysis, automating code inspections, and ensuring compliance with stringent standards. Teams integrate it into their CI/CD pipelines to maintain high-quality code, identify security vulnerabilities, and enhance code maintainability.

SonarSource Sàrl

AppSec testing optimized for the needs of API developers
APIs provide open, flexible interfaces that enable applications and services to talk to each other. But these characteristics can also make it difficult to build secure software—and even more difficult for traditional AppSec tools to test it.

Black Duck

Sample Customers

Snowflake, Booking.com, Deutsche Bank, AstraZeneca, and Ford Motor Company.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.