SonarQube vs Visual Expert comparison

SonarSource Sàrl and NOVALYS are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. SonarSource Sàrl is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while NOVALYS is ranked #67. SonarSource Sàrl holds a 18.2% mindshare in SAST, compared to NOVALYS’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of SonarSource Sàrl users are willing to recommend the solution.

SonarQube

Read 134 SonarQube reviews

38,374 Views
28,013 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Visual Expert

194 Views
194 Comparison Views

SonarQube

Visual Expert

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2025

SonarQube and Visual Expert focus on code quality analysis and optimization. SonarQube appears to lead in popularity and language integration, appealing to diverse development teams, while Visual Expert offers significant ROI with its detailed analysis tools for complex environments.

Features: SonarQube provides automatic code review, continuous integration, and extensive language support. It detects code smells, bugs, and security vulnerabilities effectively. Visual Expert offers analytical depth for SQL Server, Oracle, and PowerBuilder codes. Its impact analysis and dependency analysis benefit database and application development.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube offers straightforward deployment with cloud and on-premise options, supported by comprehensive documentation and community forums. It has reliable customer service bolstered by active community support. Visual Expert integrates easily into existing systems and offers specialized support for its technology areas with tailored assistance and deployment processes beneficial for targeted environments.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube provides various pricing tiers, reflecting its scalability and widespread usage advantages, delivering compelling ROI for diverse teams. Visual Expert's pricing aligns with its specialized toolset, bringing value in environments needing specific analytical depth. Although SonarQube’s initial cost may be lower, Visual Expert often justifies its price through enhanced problem-solving and development insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SonarQube

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

134

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Visual Expert

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

67th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of SonarQube is 18.2%, down from 26.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Expert is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SonarQube	18.2%
Visual Expert	0.2%
Other	81.6%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

KarthikHarpanhalli

Sr Software Engineering Supervisor at Mozarc Medical

Gains control over rule customization and achieves reliable vulnerability assessment

The deployment process took me about 2 or 3 hours to deploy SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), although I do not remember exactly since it was done about 2 years back. Currently, about 10 of my developers are using SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) in my company. I do not have plans to increase the usage of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) in the future as there will not be any requirement to increase. I am a senior software engineer and supervisor at Mozark Medical. My corporate email address is karthik.k.a.r.t.h.i.k.h.a.r.p.a.n.h.a.l.l.i@mozarkmedical.com. Overall, I would rate SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) as a 9 out of 10.

Read full review

Use Visual Expert?

Leave a review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	79

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube

Compared 28% of the time

Snyk vs SonarQube

Compared 9% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube

Compared 6% of the time

Coverity Static vs SonarQube

Compared 5% of the time

Semgrep vs SonarQube

Compared 4% of the time

More SonarQube Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube

January 2026

Download SonarQube product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

January 2026

Download Visual Expert product report

Also Known As

Sonar, SonarQube Cloud

No data available

Interactive Demo

SonarSource Sàrl

Demo not available

NOVALYS

Overview

SonarQube leads automated code review, enhancing code quality and security in AI-driven SDLCs. It analyzes pull requests, providing developers with actionable feedback and AI-driven fixes before code merges. Trusted by top enterprises, it supports SaaS and self-managed deployments.

SonarQube supports a wide range of programming languages and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools like Jenkins. It is renowned for its static code analysis, code coverage, and security vulnerability detection. While its open-source foundation and scalability are praised, users seek enhanced integration across multiple languages, better security features, and improved documentation. Despite challenges, its ability to automate code inspections and ensure compliance with coding standards makes it essential in software development processes, facilitating continuous improvement.

What are the most important features?

Language Support: Extensive support for multiple programming languages.
Custom Coding Rules: Allows defining project-specific rules.
Integration: Seamlessly works with Jenkins and CI/CD pipelines.
Quality Gates: Simplifies monitoring code quality.
Dashboards: Facilitates easy monitoring and management.
Static Code Analysis: Detects issues early in development.
Security Detection: Identifies vulnerabilities automatically.

What benefits should users look for?

Improved Code Quality: Enhances reliability and maintainability.
Security Assurance: Strengthens code against vulnerabilities.
Technical Debt Reduction: Ensures cleaner, maintainable code.
Efficient Feedback: Speeds up development cycles.
Standards Compliance: Aids in adhering to best practices.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and automotive, SonarQube is leveraged for static code analysis, automating code inspections, and ensuring compliance with stringent standards. Teams integrate it into their CI/CD pipelines to maintain high-quality code, identify security vulnerabilities, and enhance code maintainability.

SonarSource Sàrl

Visual Expert is a powerful tool that helps analyze and enhance code quality and performance. It provides insights for code optimization, improves code readability, and resolves issues.

With its ability to understand complex code and offer comprehensive documentation, Visual Expert enhances code quality and productivity. It also facilitates collaboration among developers and enables impact analysis.

NOVALYS

Sample Customers

Snowflake, Booking.com, Deutsche Bank, AstraZeneca, and Ford Motor Company.

1. Microsoft 2. IBM 3. Oracle 4. SAP 5. Cisco 6. Adobe 7. Salesforce 8. Intel 9. HP 10. Dell 11. Accenture 12. Deloitte 13. PwC 14. Ernst & Young 15. KPMG 16. Capgemini 17. Infosys 18. TCS (Tata Consultancy Services) 19. Wipro 20. Cognizant 21. HCL Technologies 22. Tech Mahindra 23. Fujitsu 24. NEC 25. Hitachi 26. Siemens 27. Ericsson 28. Nokia 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Sony 32. Panasonic

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.