SonicWall Capture Client vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

SonicWall and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. SonicWall is ranked #47 with an average rating of 8.0, while Trellix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8. SonicWall holds a 0.6% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SonicWall users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

SonicWall Capture Client

Read 9 SonicWall Capture Client reviews

1,582 Views
774 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews

8,653 Views
5,813 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SonicWall Capture Client

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 9, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and SonicWall Capture Client compete in the endpoint security space. Trellix seems to have the upper hand due to its robust integration capabilities and centralized management offering.

Features: Trellix provides centralized management with ePolicy Orchestrator, seamless integration with security modules, and tools for policy creation. SonicWall excels in real-time deep memory inspection, content filtering, and multi-stage attack handling.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could optimize its resource consumption and simplify its configuration procedures. SonicWall should address performance issues caused by resource consumption, modernize its management console, and improve support for legacy operating systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix offers versatile deployment options, including on-premises and cloud solutions, with generally positive customer support. SonicWall provides straightforward cloud-based deployment and responsive technical support, though it may experience delays with complex tickets.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix is reasonably priced but higher than some competitors, though it offers substantial ROI. SonicWall offers competitive pricing against high-end competitors but may be costly for small to medium-sized businesses, providing positive security ROI by reducing threat management overheads.

To learn more, read our detailed SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,807 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SonicWall Capture Client

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

47th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

39th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

9th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

158

Ranking in other categories

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of SonicWall Capture Client is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.8%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Jasmit Singh Juneja

CEO & Technology Specialist at Karman Infotech Private Limited

A stable solution that is used for endpoint security and to protect computers from malware

We are using the latest version of SonicWall Capture Client. Fortinet is ahead of SonicWall. The range of appliances, equipment, availability in my country with the distributors, and the overall ecosystem of Fortinet is way better than SonicWall. My advice to others looking into using SonicWall Capture Client is to keep giving feedback to the companies regarding whatever improvements should be made. Overall, I rate SonicWall Capture Client an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Abdullah Al Hadi

Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd

Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies

There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security ( /categories/endpoint-protection-platform-epp ) can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The threat protection feature of SonicWall Capture Client is most valuable."

"The solution serves as a very stable platform."

"SonicWall Capture Client has a serial number to connect to your firewall."

"The product’s interface is easy to use."

"The most valuable features of SonicWall Capture Client are CSC (Capture Security Center), RTDMI (Real-Time Deep Memory Inspection), and the deep memory inspection feature."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike."

"Overall, what I love the most about SonicWall Capture Client is its management console. SonicWall Capture Client also has the intelligence to tell you which computer is online, what OS it uses, etc. I also found the rollback feature and SentinelOne integration valuable in SonicWall Capture Client. Rollback is a powerful feature of the solution because it's similar to locking your endpoint during an attack, so you won't have to pay the hackers, particularly during ransomware attacks. That feature in SonicWall Capture Client allows you to get back your endpoint or make your endpoint right again after an attack. I also like that it isn't complex to remove the engine error from the endpoint because you only have to provide the security key from SonicWall Capture Client, so the process is simple. It's not complex."

More SonicWall Capture Client pros

"The most valuable features of McAfee MVISION Endpoint are advanced threat protection, web filtering, and removable storage devices in the DLP."

"McAfee EndPoint Security has a lot of good features that work well if they are implemented properly."

"The solution is reliable."

"The most valuable features of the solution include DLP (data loss prevention), CASB (cloud access security broker) functionality, endpoint encryption, and cloud workload security."

"It is easy to use, flexible, and stable. Because it is a cloud-based solution and it integrates all endpoints of the cloud, we can do an IOC-based search. It can search the entire enterprise and tell us the endpoints that are possibly compromised."

"The manageability of the product itself is its most valuable aspect. You have the underlying EPO, and on top of it, you can deploy the various components as you require. This is unlike other solutions like Symantec where you have to deploy everything or nothing. With this solution, you can choose to only deploy antivirus or only deploy a firewall, or only something else. I choose the components and that deployment is done through EPO. It makes manageability very flexible."

"The features we have found most valuable have been containment as well as the ability to triage agent activities."

"The thing that I like is that they have gathered almost all the products in one management server, the ePolicy Orchestrator."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

Cons

"The biggest issue with SonicWall Capture Client is network latency."

"Technical support from SonicWall has room for improvement. While their escalation process is understandable, it can be time-consuming as all logs need to be provided multiple times across different service levels."

"The implementation is not easy."

"SonicWall Capture Client could be made a little lighter than it currently is in terms of memory consumption."

"An area for improvement in SonicWall Capture Client is TenantCloud support. Suppose you want to implement SonicWall Capture Client. You'll have to register it on MySonicWall. Then once your SonicWall Capture Client license expires and you don't want to renew it, you can't delete it from your MySonicWall account, so that's an area for improvement."

"They should improve their user interface."

"The vulnerability reports need to be better. Windows Defender detected some issues that SonicWall Capture Client couldn't."

"SonicWall Capture Client should use less of our PC's memory, as it tends to slow down the performance."

More SonicWall Capture Client cons

"Users can just install software into their computers. We need some sort of application control system that, if there are any pieces of software that are not whitelisted, then the solution could flag it or maybe alert the administers. That would be very helpful."

"We would like to solution to offer better security."

"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past."

"The vendor should simplify the way they bundle the products because it's very hard to explain to customers what products contain which features."

"The email protection isn't efficient enough, and I'd like to see DLP features in the next release."

"I would like to see more automation."

"They can improve its resource consumption, such as memory, and maybe provide better or smaller updates. It always takes a lot of resources, but it has been getting better. I have been using McAfee products for the last 20 years or so, and I know it is getting better."

"I've encountered minor challenges related to encryption."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You have to pay for the solution, and a lot of customers do not want to pay."

"Here in Indonesia, SonicWall Capture Client costs five hundred thousand rupiahs for every endpoint. If I'm correct, you only have to pay the licensing fee, and there's no additional fee. To me, the pricing for SonicWall Capture Client is four out of five."

"The product is very expensive."

"It is reasonably priced."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."

"The solution is not an expensive tool. Compared to other options, it's mostly average-priced. I've deployed it for customers ranging from 100 nodes to over 5,000 nodes. Its renewal prices are very low, and it offers both perpetual and subscription licenses. With a perpetual license, the product will keep working as long as it's not end-of-life, which benefits companies."

"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."

"It's fairly priced compared to other products on the market."

"The pricing is great and licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

"The product pricing is high."

"It is not so cheap in comparison to Sophos and other solutions."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

11%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

31%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client could benefit from an improved graphical user interface with more modern and minimal icons. Additionally, one of the drawbacks is that I cannot use Advanced and Premier lic...

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 20% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 18% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 17% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 8% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 7% of the time

More SonicWall Capture Client Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 17% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

June 2025

Download SonicWall Capture Client product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

May 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Overview

SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.

SonicWall

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Luton College

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Buyer's Guide

SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

June 2025

Free Report: SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.