Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
SonicWall Capture Client Logo

Top 10 SonicWall Capture Client Alternatives

Vendor: SonicWall
4.0 out of 5
Start review

Top SonicWall Capture Client Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SonicWall Capture Client based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SonicWall Capture Client surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive endpoint protection with real-time threat detection, advanced anti-malware capabilities, and seamless integration with SonicWall's firewall technology, ensuring superior security and streamlined management for businesses.

SonicWall Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SonicWall, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in threat detection with minimal resource impact. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client, notable for its rollback feature, integrates strong threat protection but may hinder performance. CrowdStrike appeals to those prioritizing efficiency, while SonicWall suits those needing strong rollback.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
CrowdStrike Falcon generally incurs higher setup costs, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon generally incurs higher setup costs, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is praised for robust threat detection and Microsoft tool integration. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client features advanced security like real-time malware prevention. Microsoft Defender offers competitive pricing and significant ROI, while SonicWall Capture Client's extensive feature set justifies its higher pricing.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas SonicWall Capture Client has a more affordable setup cost.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas SonicWall Capture Client has a more affordable setup cost.
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.3 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in real-time threat detection with advanced machine learning capabilities. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client offers extensive integration options, making it suitable for complex environments. SentinelOne is noted for cost-effectiveness, while SonicWall justifies its higher price with robust features.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
The setup cost for SentinelOne Singularity Complete is relatively higher compared to SonicWall Capture Client, which is known for its affordability. SentinelOne focuses on comprehensive security features, while SonicWall provides cost-effective endpoint protection.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for SentinelOne Singularity Complete is relatively higher compared to SonicWall Capture Client, which is known for its affordability. SentinelOne focuses on comprehensive security features, while SonicWall provides cost-effective endpoint protection.
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Cortex XDR offers advanced threat detection through behavioral analytics and extensive threat intelligence, ideal for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client provides seamless integration with SonicWall products and a user-friendly interface, catering to those seeking straightforward deployment and ease of use.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks generally involves a higher setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks generally involves a higher setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more affordable initial investment.
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient is praised for its robust VPN capabilities and integration with Fortinet infrastructure. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client excels in advanced threat protection and endpoint detection and response. Fortinet FortiClient users appreciate its cost-effective pricing, while SonicWall Capture Client delivers higher value through a more extensive feature set.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
Fortinet FortiClient's setup cost is relatively low, while SonicWall Capture Client's setup cost is comparatively higher.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient's setup cost is relatively low, while SonicWall Capture Client's setup cost is comparatively higher.
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers advanced threat detection and a comprehensive security suite. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client excels in real-time malware protection and easy integration. Symantec's customer support is highly regarded, whereas SonicWall provides competitive pricing and fast ROI with efficient malware prevention.
Download SonicWall Capture Client vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more affordable initial setup.
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security excels in support and intuitive features. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client offers advanced functionalities and real-time threat intelligence. Trend Vision One has competitive setup costs, while SonicWall Capture Client justifies its higher price with comprehensive features and satisfactory ROI. Trend Vision One is user-friendly.
Download SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more affordable setup option. Trend Vision One is suited for larger budgets, whereas SonicWall Capture Client is ideal for cost-conscious customers.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more affordable setup option. Trend Vision One is suited for larger budgets, whereas SonicWall Capture Client is ideal for cost-conscious customers.
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in threat intelligence and advanced malware protection, appealing for its cost-effective pricing and competitive support. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client offers real-time threat detection and seamless cloud integration, justifying its higher price with comprehensive features and quick deployment advantages.
Download SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security's setup cost is moderate and straightforward, whereas SonicWall Capture Client has a higher initial setup cost and involves a more complex process.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security's setup cost is moderate and straightforward, whereas SonicWall Capture Client has a higher initial setup cost and involves a more complex process.
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky offers comprehensive threat protection and user-friendly reliability, while SonicWall provides robust detection and seamless integration. In comparison, Kaspersky is cost-effective, with straightforward deployment, whereas SonicWall's advanced capabilities and cloud-based management justify the higher price. Each solution appeals to different security and budget needs.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has low setup costs, while SonicWall Capture Client requires a higher investment for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has low setup costs, while SonicWall Capture Client requires a higher investment for setup.
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Intercept X Endpoint excels in advanced threat protection, particularly in ransomware detection, making it appealing for organizations with stringent security needs. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client's seamless integration with other SonicWall products and network visibility offers a compelling choice for businesses seeking robust, interconnected solutions.
Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
The setup cost for Intercept X Endpoint is affordable, while SonicWall Capture Client is noted for its competitive pricing. Intercept X Endpoint offers advanced threat protection, contrasting with SonicWall's robust network security features.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Intercept X Endpoint is affordable, while SonicWall Capture Client is noted for its competitive pricing. Intercept X Endpoint offers advanced threat protection, contrasting with SonicWall's robust network security features.
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is appreciated for comprehensive threat detection and ease of managing devices. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client is praised for advanced threat protection and seamless integration. ESET emphasizes user-friendly management, while SonicWall focuses on advanced security protocols, justifying its higher cost.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features a straightforward and cost-effective setup, while SonicWall Capture Client's setup may involve higher initial costs and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features a straightforward and cost-effective setup, while SonicWall Capture Client's setup may involve higher initial costs and complexity.
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
Malwarebytes attracts budget-conscious buyers with its simplicity and effectiveness in malware detection. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client offers advanced threat detection and endpoint protection, appealing to those requiring comprehensive security features. Malwarebytes is easy to deploy, while SonicWall Capture Client supports complex configurations but requires more effort.
Download Malwarebytes vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
Malwarebytes has a lower setup cost and SonicWall Capture Client's initial expense is higher, reflecting its advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Malwarebytes has a lower setup cost and SonicWall Capture Client's initial expense is higher, reflecting its advanced security features.
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Bitdefender Total Security
4.4 out of 5
SonicWall Capture Client is valued for advanced threat protection and endpoint detection capabilities, while Bitdefender Total Security includes comprehensive tools such as multi-layer ransomware protection and VPN. In comparison, SonicWall's simplified interface is contrasted by Bitdefender's superior customer service and cross-platform support.
Download Bitdefender Total Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
SonicWall Capture Client has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender Total Security, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall Capture Client has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender Total Security, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
4.1 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security excels in advanced threat detection and comprehensive reporting tools. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client is valued for real-time threat intelligence and quick installation. A tech buyer might choose Bitdefender for its extensive features, while SonicWall appeals with its robust performance and simple management.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to SonicWall Capture Client. SonicWall Capture Client, however, provides a more robust initial security configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to SonicWall Capture Client. SonicWall Capture Client, however, provides a more robust initial security configuration.
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
3.9 out of 5
Webroot is praised for its lightweight design, effective threat detection, simple deployment, and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, SonicWall is favored for its advanced threat protection, integration capabilities, stronger features, responsive customer service, and higher value per price. Both have improvement areas and unique advantages.
Download SonicWall Capture Client vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection Report
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection's setup cost is significantly lower compared to SonicWall Capture Client's setup cost, highlighting a key cost advantage for Webroot.
View comparison
Pricing
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection's setup cost is significantly lower compared to SonicWall Capture Client's setup cost, highlighting a key cost advantage for Webroot.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)