Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs SonicWall Capture Client comparison

OpenText and SonicWall are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #49 with an average rating of 6.5, while SonicWall is ranked #45 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to SonicWall’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.
OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...
Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ reviews
  • 1,804 Views
  • 1,606 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
SonicWall Capture Client
Read 10 SonicWall Capture Client reviews
  • 1,702 Views
  • 1,430 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

The products OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and SonicWall Capture Client compete in the computer security category. OpenText has the upper hand due to its efficient deployment, low system impact, and affordability.

Features: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers a powerful cloud console, fast scanning, and low overhead. Its AI functionality is highly valued, alongside minimal system impact. SonicWall Capture Client is recognized for its rollback feature, integration with SentinelOne, and Real-Time Deep Memory Inspection, providing robust threat protection.

Room for Improvement: OpenText users express a need for better reporting, enhanced upgrade control, and fewer false positives, along with improved threat analysis. SonicWall faces issues with performance impact such as memory consumption and network latency. It requires better vulnerability reporting and a modern user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection can be easily deployed across cloud environments. However, its customer service receives mixed feedback. SonicWall Capture Client, while resource-heavy, has positive customer service reviews, often being described as consistently good.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText is seen as cost-effective with transparent pricing and flexible subscriptions. It delivers positive ROI due to competitive pricing. SonicWall’s cost varies by region, and its pricing fairness receives mixed reviews. OpenText’s affordability and value offer a stronger ROI narrative.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report (Updated: August 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. SonicWall Capture Client
August 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
49th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SonicWall Capture Client
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
45th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (41st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ is 0.8%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonicWall Capture Client is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that offers good UI and documentation
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.
Read full review
LUIZ FERNANDO MARIANO SILVA - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables faster updates and provides an easy-to-use user interface
I have an advanced license that includes all features. Though we have the license, we cannot use it completely because it is not enabled in the Microsoft tier. It does not make sense. We do not want to buy it separately because the price is different if we buy separate licenses.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"They have a lot of features integrated from way back, which shows that the product developers know exactly what they're doing."
"It monitors traffic and keeps us from getting ransomware or other viruses."
"Webroot's tech support is pretty good; they've given me some pointers."
"Their policy management, their cloud-based dashboard and user interface are very easy to navigate."
"The main reason we had Webroot is that it was cost-effective for our clients."
"The most valuable features of the solution include the endpoint navigation protection, the protection related to the EMS service, as well as the control and the cloud integration capabilities."
"It is very lightweight on the workstations, not slowing them down while still doing its job very well."
"Valuable features include good scanning, very light footprint and management console that the client can access and (just as important) in which I can see status of groups of computers (I am a consultant, IT role)."
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ pros
"SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike."
"Considering other products, SonicWall Capture Client has two differentiators."
"Overall, what I love the most about SonicWall Capture Client is its management console. SonicWall Capture Client also has the intelligence to tell you which computer is online, what OS it uses, etc. I also found the rollback feature and SentinelOne integration valuable in SonicWall Capture Client. Rollback is a powerful feature of the solution because it's similar to locking your endpoint during an attack, so you won't have to pay the hackers, particularly during ransomware attacks. That feature in SonicWall Capture Client allows you to get back your endpoint or make your endpoint right again after an attack. I also like that it isn't complex to remove the engine error from the endpoint because you only have to provide the security key from SonicWall Capture Client, so the process is simple. It's not complex."
"SonicWall Capture Client has a serial number to connect to your firewall."
"SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice."
"The product’s interface is easy to use."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The threat protection feature of SonicWall Capture Client is most valuable."
More SonicWall Capture Client pros
 

Cons

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats."
"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats."
"Technical support is not the best. It's hard to get a hold of them if we need help. It's something that definitely needs improvement."
"It would be nice if it had a feature for automatically generating reports on the client end for device status, security status and backup information."
"I want Webroot to be easier to use and set up. It is not very intuitive."
"Unified threat management (UTM) integration."
"It needs to improve the problems with the faster connection, and have a huge reduction in false positives."
"The solution could improve by providing better ransomware protection."
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ cons
"Technical support from SonicWall has room for improvement. While their escalation process is understandable, it can be time-consuming as all logs need to be provided multiple times across different service levels."
"They should improve their user interface."
"It takes technical support too long to resolve an issue."
"SonicWall Capture Client could be made a little lighter than it currently is in terms of memory consumption."
"The biggest issue with SonicWall Capture Client is network latency."
"The implementation is not easy."
"SonicWall Capture Client should use less of our PC's memory, as it tends to slow down the performance."
"An area for improvement in SonicWall Capture Client is TenantCloud support. Suppose you want to implement SonicWall Capture Client. You'll have to register it on MySonicWall. Then once your SonicWall Capture Client license expires and you don't want to renew it, you can't delete it from your MySonicWall account, so that's an area for improvement."
More SonicWall Capture Client cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Webroot is less expensive than SentinelOne."
"We are on an annual subscription for the use of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection."
"The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."
"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."
"If you purchase for clients, then you are the managing billing entity. It's better to either get a monthly subscription check from your clients, or to prepay for the year (so as to not keep cash in reserve to pay the bill each month) IMHO."
"Get a trial, then a multi-year license."
"We evaluate other options using multiple choices, best value, management and functionality."
"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ pricing and cost advice
"Here in Indonesia, SonicWall Capture Client costs five hundred thousand rupiahs for every endpoint. If I'm correct, you only have to pay the licensing fee, and there's no additional fee. To me, the pricing for SonicWall Capture Client is four out of five."
"You have to pay for the solution, and a lot of customers do not want to pay."
"The product is very expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Real Estate/Law Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
13%
Computer Software Company
9%
Educational Organization
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.
See all answers
What do you like most about SonicWall Capture Client?
SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonicWall Capture Client?
SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SonicWall Capture Client?
It is not similar to other products. For XDR, users have to use another product. XDR cannot be used unless MDR services are purchased with SonicWall. If a user has SonicWall MDR services, then they...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 18% of the time
HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 13% of the time
Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 10% of the time
Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 10% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 9% of the time
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 20% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 19% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 11% of the time
Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 8% of the time
Huntress Managed EDR vs SonicWall Capture Client Logo
Huntress Managed EDR vs SonicWall Capture Client
Compared 7% of the time
More SonicWall Capture Client Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
August 2025
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ reportDownload OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ product report
Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
August 2025
SonicWall Capture Client reportDownload SonicWall Capture Client product report
 

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection
No data available
 

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?
  • Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
  • AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
  • Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
  • Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
  • Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic
What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?
  • Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
  • Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
  • Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.

SonicWall
 

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners
Luton College
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. SonicWall Capture Client
August 2025
Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. SonicWall Capture Client
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. SonicWall Capture Client and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. SonicWall Capture Client report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.