Telerik Test Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

Progress Software and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Progress Software is ranked #25, while UiPath is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Progress Software holds a 1.3% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,330 Views
678 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

3,433 Views
2,987 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 4, 2026

Telerik Test Studio and UiPath Test Cloud are competitive products in the test automation market. Telerik Test Studio provides an edge in pricing and deployment effectiveness, while UiPath Test Cloud justifies its higher cost with advanced features and a greater return on investment.

Features: Telerik Test Studio offers codeless testing, allowing users without strong programming skills to automate tests easily. It supports comprehensive test automation and includes PDF validation, which is particularly useful for document-heavy testing environments. UiPath Test Cloud excels with robust integration capabilities, advanced AI-driven testing features, and a strong emphasis on API integration and end-to-end workflow creation.

Room for Improvement: Telerik Test Studio could benefit from enhancing its integration with other platforms and expanding AI-driven features. More support for advanced test scenarios and diverse technology stacks would be advantageous. UiPath Test Cloud may improve by simplifying deployment processes and better accommodating entry-level testers. Streamlining its complex features for easier adoption and providing more cost-effective solutions for smaller teams could be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Telerik Test Studio offers straightforward deployment and intuitive operation, ideal for companies needing quick start-ups. Its ease of use is complemented by effective customer service. UiPath Test Cloud has a more complex deployment process, balanced by extensive customer support that aids in customizations and integrations.

Pricing and ROI: Telerik Test Studio provides affordable setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. UiPath Test Cloud, although priced higher, delivers a higher ROI through its rich feature set and broad automation capabilities. It offers long-term value in dynamic testing environments, making the initial investment worthwhile for extensive automation needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (14th), Regression Testing Tools (11th)

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (4th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 3.8%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	3.8%
Telerik Test Studio	1.3%
Other	94.9%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Chirag N M

Senior Quality Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Supports multiple platforms and identifies elements in a good way

Instead of Telerik Test Studio, I'd recommend writing test cases in .Net so that in the future, if you move away from Telerik Test Studio to another tool, it would be easier for you. Your current code would be reusable. You won't have to change your test cases much. We wrote our code in a separate IDE, which was Visual Studio, and internally, we had the infrastructure to interact with Telerik Test Studio. All the internal logic that we needed for our purpose was implemented in .NET, and we used Telerik Test Studio for tests. I'd rate Telerik Test Studio an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop. This allows us to create different suites in TestManager, schedule them, and integrate them with CI/CD."

"What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities."

"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."

"The Test Manager, the final stage of the UiPath Test Suite, is its most valuable feature."

"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."

"Test Manager is helpful for tracking process steps. We can see which step is failing."

"The detailed logging is invaluable."

"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."

"The pricing isn't as low as other options."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath to test on it, which is inefficient."

"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"Storing the test scripts is what needs to improve in the UiPath Test Suite, as it's currently a challenge to some extent. Maintaining the files is a bit challenging, especially when you need to keep those locally."

"If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it."

"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"It represents good value for the investment."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

Comparisons

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 11% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 6% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 6% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 26% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

January 2026

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

January 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud

January 2026

Free Report: Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.