Telerik Test Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

Progress Software and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Progress Software is ranked #26, while UiPath is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9. Progress Software holds a 0.8% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

603 Views
132 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 25 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

2,736 Views
516 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 22, 2025

Telerik Test Studio and UiPath Test Cloud are key players in the automated testing space. UiPath Test Cloud is seen as stronger due to its advanced capabilities and seamless integration, although Telerik Test Studio is often preferred for its cost-effectiveness and support offerings.

Features: Telerik Test Studio offers an intuitive interface, scriptless test creation, and PDF validation, making it accessible for beginners. UiPath Test Cloud includes AI-driven automation, integration with CI/CD workflows, and low-code options, enhancing productivity in complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Telerik Test Studio could expand its advanced testing capabilities and enhance its integration with other lifecycle tools. UiPath Test Cloud might improve by simplifying its deployment process and enhancing its cost efficiency for entry-level users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Telerik Test Studio is known for its straightforward deployment and comprehensive support, ensuring seamless implementation. UiPath Test Cloud offers robust support to navigate its more complex deployment, effectively resolving issues.

Pricing and ROI: Telerik Test Studio stands out for its affordability and quick ROI. In contrast, UiPath Test Cloud, while costing more upfront, promises a substantial return through its extensive features and integration capabilities, ensuring long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (17th), Regression Testing Tools (12th)

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (6th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 0.8%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 5.0%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Manigandan Rajavelu

Sr software engineer at PricewaterhouseCoopers

Comprehensive, good value for money, and a lot of time savings

I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."

"Test Manager is helpful for tracking process steps. We can see which step is failing."

"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."

"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."

"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."

"It has reduced all the deployment cycles of the automation solutions by forty percent."

"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."

"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility."

"If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it."

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

"The pricing isn't as low as other options."

"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath to test on it, which is inefficient."

"It would be very beneficial to do load testing with Test Suite."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules. If they could add defect management, it could work independently wit...

See all answers

Comparisons

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 34% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 19% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 14% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 12% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 8% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 47% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 17% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

May 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

June 2025

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

UiPath Test Cloud revolutionizes testing through advanced AI agents, enhancing productivity in software assessment.

UiPath Test Cloud, with its AI-augmented automation, offers testers enterprise-grade capabilities for over 190 technologies. Featuring seamless integration with tools like Orchestrator and CI/CD pipelines, it streamlines testing processes and cuts maintenance costs. While users value its functionalities, the need for enhancements in mobile automation and third-party integration, particularly with Jira, is recognized. Efficient test organization through Test Manager and simplified process management via the cloud are noteworthy. Enhancements in reporting and file management are sought, highlighting areas for development.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Drag-and-Drop Programming: Enables easy test creation with minimal technical knowledge.
Robust Robotic Functionality: Offers reliable automation across a wide array of technologies.
API Integration: Ensures seamless connectivity with existing systems.
Detailed Logging: Provides comprehensive logs for better analysis and debugging.
Test Manager: Organizes tests efficiently and simplifies management.

What benefits should users evaluate in UiPath Test Cloud?

Enhanced Productivity: Accelerates test creation and execution.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces manual effort and maintenance expenses.
Cross-Platform Support: Offers flexibility in testing across different environments.
Improved Quality: Delivers high-quality software with speed and efficiency.

Organizations across industries utilize UiPath Test Cloud for testing types such as origination, smoke, and web application testing. Common implementations include testing in supply chain management, regression testing, and integrating workflows. Teams find it beneficial for ensuring functionality and efficiency in mobile app testing, enabling cross-platform support for RPA and applications like Oracle and SAP.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud

June 2025

Free Report: Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.