Telerik Test Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

Progress Software and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Progress Software is ranked #26, while UiPath is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Progress Software holds a 1.2% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,219 Views
622 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

3,113 Views
2,802 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 4, 2026

Telerik Test Studio and UiPath Test Cloud are competitive products in the test automation market. Telerik Test Studio provides an edge in pricing and deployment effectiveness, while UiPath Test Cloud justifies its higher cost with advanced features and a greater return on investment.

Features: Telerik Test Studio offers codeless testing, allowing users without strong programming skills to automate tests easily. It supports comprehensive test automation and includes PDF validation, which is particularly useful for document-heavy testing environments. UiPath Test Cloud excels with robust integration capabilities, advanced AI-driven testing features, and a strong emphasis on API integration and end-to-end workflow creation.

Room for Improvement: Telerik Test Studio could benefit from enhancing its integration with other platforms and expanding AI-driven features. More support for advanced test scenarios and diverse technology stacks would be advantageous. UiPath Test Cloud may improve by simplifying deployment processes and better accommodating entry-level testers. Streamlining its complex features for easier adoption and providing more cost-effective solutions for smaller teams could be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Telerik Test Studio offers straightforward deployment and intuitive operation, ideal for companies needing quick start-ups. Its ease of use is complemented by effective customer service. UiPath Test Cloud has a more complex deployment process, balanced by extensive customer support that aids in customizations and integrations.

Pricing and ROI: Telerik Test Studio provides affordable setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. UiPath Test Cloud, although priced higher, delivers a higher ROI through its rich feature set and broad automation capabilities. It offers long-term value in dynamic testing environments, making the initial investment worthwhile for extensive automation needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (14th), Regression Testing Tools (11th)

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (4th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 4.1%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	4.1%
Telerik Test Studio	1.2%
Other	94.7%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Chirag N M

Senior Quality Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Supports multiple platforms and identifies elements in a good way

Instead of Telerik Test Studio, I'd recommend writing test cases in .Net so that in the future, if you move away from Telerik Test Studio to another tool, it would be easier for you. Your current code would be reusable. You won't have to change your test cases much. We wrote our code in a separate IDE, which was Visual Studio, and internally, we had the infrastructure to interact with Telerik Test Studio. All the internal logic that we needed for our purpose was implemented in .NET, and we used Telerik Test Studio for tests. I'd rate Telerik Test Studio an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The document understanding is good."

"UiPath Test Cloud definitely helps free up time for other projects for our engineers."

"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."

"The Test Manager, the final stage of the UiPath Test Suite, is its most valuable feature."

"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."

"UiPath Test Cloud has helped automate major applications such as SAP and Oracle, which are significant needle movers, particularly in a project we did where a customer was migrating from on-prem to cloud for SAP, allowing us to regression test hyper-fast while rolling out new modules and automating at the same time."

"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."

"It has reduced all the deployment cycles of the automation solutions by forty percent."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting."

"They could improve the visualization of the product."

"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."

"At FORWARD VI, we see new automations being built around AI and the ability to have developers understand how they can drive some of those AI capabilities with Studio. We are starting to see that. They should also drive that with UiPath Test Suite so that we can not only build that development side faster; we can also develop the tests that go along with it, hopefully automatically."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"Accessing the full functionality of the Test Suite manager, including the dashboard, requires a tenant license."

"More precise logging would be appreciated."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"Its price is a bit high."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

Comparisons

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 30% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

December 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

January 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud

January 2026

Free Report: Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.