Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Telerik Test Studio Logo

Top 10 Telerik Test Studio Alternatives

Vendor: Progress Software
4.0 out of 5
551 followers
Start review

Top Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Telerik Test Studio based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Tricentis Tosca, Apache JMeter, and Katalon Studio. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Progress Software Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Progress Software, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Tricentis Tosca
4.1 out of 5
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Tricentis Tosca
4.1 out of 5
Tricentis Tosca is chosen for robust automation and complex enterprise needs. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio attracts users who prioritize ease of use and quick deployment. Tricentis Tosca benefits businesses seeking advanced functionality, while Telerik Test Studio suits organizations requiring simplicity and cost-effectiveness.
Download Telerik Test Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca Report
Tricentis Tosca has a higher setup cost compared to Telerik Test Studio, highlighting a key difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Tricentis Tosca has a higher setup cost compared to Telerik Test Studio, highlighting a key difference in initial investment.
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Apache JMeter
3.9 out of 5
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Apache JMeter
3.9 out of 5
Apache JMeter is open-source and excels in load testing and customization, appealing to those prioritizing cost efficiency. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio offers robust automation and seamless integration with comprehensive support, attracting users who value intuitive setups despite a higher price tag.
Download Apache JMeter vs. Telerik Test Studio Report
Apache JMeter offers a cost-effective setup option, while Telerik Test Studio involves higher initial expenses. Users seeking budget-friendly solutions may lean towards Apache JMeter, contrasting with Telerik Test Studio's more premium pricing approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Apache JMeter offers a cost-effective setup option, while Telerik Test Studio involves higher initial expenses. Users seeking budget-friendly solutions may lean towards Apache JMeter, contrasting with Telerik Test Studio's more premium pricing approach.
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Katalon Studio
3.9 out of 5
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Katalon Studio
3.9 out of 5
Telerik Test Studio offers robust cross-browser testing and seamless integration, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Katalon Studio's all-in-one platform supports web, API, mobile, and desktop applications. Telerik's higher initial costs come with advanced features, while Katalon provides cost-effective deployment and flexible pricing.
Download Katalon Studio vs. Telerik Test Studio Report
Telerik Test Studio has a significant setup cost with additional licensing fees, while Katalon Studio offers a lower initial setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Telerik Test Studio has a significant setup cost with additional licensing fees, while Katalon Studio offers a lower initial setup investment.
Telerik Test Studio Logo
OpenText UFT One
4.0 out of 5
Telerik Test Studio Logo
OpenText UFT One
4.0 out of 5
OpenText UFT One excels in deployment and customer support, ideal for complex testing needs. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio prides itself on ease of use and rapid test creation, making it suitable for agile teams seeking quick transitions and cost-effective solutions.
Download OpenText UFT One vs. Telerik Test Studio Report
OpenText UFT One involves a higher setup cost compared to Telerik Test Studio, which offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText UFT One involves a higher setup cost compared to Telerik Test Studio, which offers a more cost-effective setup option.
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Telerik Test Studio Logo
SmartBear TestComplete
3.8 out of 5
SmartBear TestComplete excels with affordability and customer support for flexible scripting. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio offers advanced features, particularly in performance testing. SmartBear's ease of deployment attracts budget-conscious buyers, while Telerik appeals to those valuing feature-rich, long-term automation capabilities.
Download SmartBear TestComplete vs. Telerik Test Studio Report
SmartBear TestComplete offers a quick and straightforward setup, while Telerik Test Studio may involve a more intricate initial configuration process. This distinction highlights TestComplete's advantage in ease of initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
SmartBear TestComplete offers a quick and straightforward setup, while Telerik Test Studio may involve a more intricate initial configuration process. This distinction highlights TestComplete's advantage in ease of initial deployment.
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Selenium HQ
4.0 out of 5
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Selenium HQ
4.0 out of 5
Selenium HQ appeals to tech buyers appreciating open-source flexibility, allowing versatile integrations. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio offers ease with built-in features like record and playback. Selenium HQ requires more technical expertise, while Telerik Test Studio provides faster deployment with robust customer support.
Download Selenium HQ vs. Telerik Test Studio Report
Selenium HQ offers no setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice, while Telerik Test Studio has an initial setup cost, suggesting a more structured investment upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Selenium HQ offers no setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice, while Telerik Test Studio has an initial setup cost, suggesting a more structured investment upfront.
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Ranorex Studio
4.0 out of 5
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Ranorex Studio
4.0 out of 5
Ranorex Studio stands out for its competitive pricing and simplified deployment, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio offers extensive integration capabilities and superior customer service, attracting those valuing advanced features despite higher initial costs for comprehensive development tools.
Download Ranorex Studio vs. Telerik Test Studio Report
Ranorex Studio has a higher setup cost, while Telerik Test Studio offers a more cost-effective initial setup, making the latter a more budget-friendly option in terms of setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Ranorex Studio has a higher setup cost, while Telerik Test Studio offers a more cost-effective initial setup, making the latter a more budget-friendly option in terms of setup expenses.
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Qt Squish
4.4 out of 5
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Qt Squish
4.4 out of 5
Qt Squish is preferred for its cross-platform flexibility and scripting language support. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio offers advanced test management and integration capabilities. Qt Squish suits technical teams, while Telerik Test Studio appeals to organizations valuing ease of deployment and comprehensive features.
Download Qt Squish vs. Telerik Test Studio Report
Qt Squish's setup cost is lower, focusing on powerful scripting and automation capabilities, whereas Telerik Test Studio offers a straightforward setup with comprehensive test management features.
View comparison
Pricing
Qt Squish's setup cost is lower, focusing on powerful scripting and automation capabilities, whereas Telerik Test Studio offers a straightforward setup with comprehensive test management features.
Telerik Test Studio Logo
UiPath Test Cloud
4.0 out of 5
Telerik Test Studio Logo
UiPath Test Cloud
4.0 out of 5
Telerik Test Studio offers simplicity and cost-efficiency for teams needing swift, straightforward automation. In comparison, UiPath Test Cloud, with its advanced AI tools and comprehensive support, suits large enterprises requiring complex solutions and is justified by higher long-term value despite the initial investment.
Download Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report
Telerik Test Studio has an initial setup cost, while UiPath Test Cloud offers a more flexible setup structure. UiPath Test Cloud's model appeals to projects requiring scalability, whereas Telerik's fixed pricing may benefit projects with stable requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Telerik Test Studio has an initial setup cost, while UiPath Test Cloud offers a more flexible setup structure. UiPath Test Cloud's model appeals to projects requiring scalability, whereas Telerik's fixed pricing may benefit projects with stable requirements.
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Telerik Test Studio Logo
OpenText UFT Developer
3.7 out of 5
OpenText UFT Developer excels in integration with diverse development environments and offers personalized technical support. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio's comprehensive suite includes functional, performance, and load testing, providing robust features that justify its higher price with faster test creation and execution.
Download OpenText UFT Developer vs. Telerik Test Studio Report
OpenText UFT Developer has a higher setup cost, offering advanced automation tools, whereas Telerik Test Studio presents a more affordable setup cost with efficient features.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText UFT Developer has a higher setup cost, offering advanced automation tools, whereas Telerik Test Studio presents a more affordable setup cost with efficient features.
Telerik Test Studio Logo
LEAPWORK
3.8 out of 5
Telerik Test Studio Logo
LEAPWORK
3.8 out of 5
Telerik Test Studio offers robust testing across web and desktop platforms with competitive pricing. In comparison, LEAPWORK excels with no-code automation and integration capabilities. Telerik's cost-effectiveness appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while LEAPWORK attracts those seeking advanced features despite higher costs.
Download LEAPWORK vs. Telerik Test Studio Report
Telerik Test Studio requires a substantial setup cost, whereas LEAPWORK offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Telerik Test Studio requires a substantial setup cost, whereas LEAPWORK offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Telerik Test Studio Logo
Visual Studio Test Professional
4.2 out of 5
Visual Studio Test Professional integrates seamlessly with Microsoft's ecosystem, making it ideal for existing Microsoft users seeking enhanced collaboration. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio offers advanced automation capabilities and flexible deployment, appealing to those requiring comprehensive testing across varied environments despite its higher costs.
Download Telerik Test Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report
Visual Studio Test Professional offers a moderate setup cost, while Telerik Test Studio provides a higher setup cost, highlighting a key difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Visual Studio Test Professional offers a moderate setup cost, while Telerik Test Studio provides a higher setup cost, highlighting a key difference in initial investment.
Telerik Test Studio Logo
OpenText Silk Test
3.8 out of 5
Telerik Test Studio Logo
OpenText Silk Test
3.8 out of 5
OpenText Silk Test excels with cost-effective cross-browser testing, appealing to budget-conscious firms. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio's extensive integrations justify higher investment, attracting tech buyers needing flexible, integrated solutions. Tech buyers might prefer OpenText for affordability, while Telerik offers advanced features.
Download OpenText Silk Test vs. Telerik Test Studio Report
OpenText Silk Test has an initial setup cost seen as higher by users, while Telerik Test Studio is perceived as more affordable and easier to deploy, highlighting a significant difference in user feedback regarding installation and initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Silk Test has an initial setup cost seen as higher by users, while Telerik Test Studio is perceived as more affordable and easier to deploy, highlighting a significant difference in user feedback regarding installation and initial investment.
Telerik Test Studio Logo
UBIK Load Pack
1 out of 5
Telerik Test Studio Logo
UBIK Load Pack
1 out of 5

Enterprise Grade load testing plugins for Apache JMeter. 

View comparison

Related categories

Functional Testing Tools
Load Testing Tools
Regression Testing Tools