Top 10 Telerik Test Studio Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

5 reviews
100% willing to recommend

541 followers

Top Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Telerik Test Studio based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, and Apache JMeter. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Progress Software Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Progress Software, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Tricentis Tosca

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis Tosca

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis Tosca is chosen for robust automation and complex enterprise needs. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio attracts users who prioritize ease of use and quick deployment. Tricentis Tosca benefits businesses seeking advanced functionality, while Telerik Test Studio suits organizations requiring simplicity and cost-effectiveness.

Download Telerik Test Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca Report

Pricing

Tricentis Tosca has a higher setup cost compared to Telerik Test Studio, highlighting a key difference in initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Tricentis Tosca has a higher setup cost compared to Telerik Test Studio, highlighting a key difference in initial investment.

Katalon Studio

3.9 out of 5

Katalon Studio

3.9 out of 5

Telerik Test Studio offers robust cross-browser testing and seamless integration, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Katalon Studio's all-in-one platform supports web, API, mobile, and desktop applications. Telerik's higher initial costs come with advanced features, while Katalon provides cost-effective deployment and flexible pricing.

Download Katalon Studio vs. Telerik Test Studio Report

Pricing

Telerik Test Studio has a significant setup cost with additional licensing fees, while Katalon Studio offers a lower initial setup investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Telerik Test Studio has a significant setup cost with additional licensing fees, while Katalon Studio offers a lower initial setup investment.

Apache JMeter

3.9 out of 5

Apache JMeter

3.9 out of 5

Apache JMeter is open-source and excels in load testing and customization, appealing to those prioritizing cost efficiency. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio offers robust automation and seamless integration with comprehensive support, attracting users who value intuitive setups despite a higher price tag.

Download Apache JMeter vs. Telerik Test Studio Report

Pricing

Apache JMeter offers a cost-effective setup option, while Telerik Test Studio involves higher initial expenses. Users seeking budget-friendly solutions may lean towards Apache JMeter, contrasting with Telerik Test Studio's more premium pricing approach.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText Functional Testing

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Functional Testing

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Functional Testing is ideal for complex environments with its integration capabilities. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio offers a user-friendly setup, emphasizing simplicity and quick test creation. OpenText suits scalability needs, while Telerik appeals to smaller teams seeking efficiency and rapid deployment.

Download OpenText Functional Testing vs. Telerik Test Studio Report

Pricing

OpenText Functional Testing incurs higher setup costs, while Telerik Test Studio offers a more budget-friendly implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText Functional Testing incurs higher setup costs, while Telerik Test Studio offers a more budget-friendly implementation.

SmartBear TestComplete

3.8 out of 5

SmartBear TestComplete

3.8 out of 5

SmartBear TestComplete excels with affordability and customer support for flexible scripting. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio offers advanced features, particularly in performance testing. SmartBear's ease of deployment attracts budget-conscious buyers, while Telerik appeals to those valuing feature-rich, long-term automation capabilities.

Download SmartBear TestComplete vs. Telerik Test Studio Report

Pricing

SmartBear TestComplete offers a quick and straightforward setup, while Telerik Test Studio may involve a more intricate initial configuration process. This distinction highlights TestComplete's advantage in ease of initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Selenium HQ

4.0 out of 5

Selenium HQ

4.0 out of 5

Selenium HQ appeals to tech buyers appreciating open-source flexibility, allowing versatile integrations. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio offers ease with built-in features like record and playback. Selenium HQ requires more technical expertise, while Telerik Test Studio provides faster deployment with robust customer support.

Download Selenium HQ vs. Telerik Test Studio Report

Pricing

Selenium HQ offers no setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice, while Telerik Test Studio has an initial setup cost, suggesting a more structured investment upfront.

View comparison

Pricing

Selenium HQ offers no setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice, while Telerik Test Studio has an initial setup cost, suggesting a more structured investment upfront.

Ranorex Studio

4.0 out of 5

Ranorex Studio

4.0 out of 5

Ranorex Studio stands out for its competitive pricing and simplified deployment, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio offers extensive integration capabilities and superior customer service, attracting those valuing advanced features despite higher initial costs for comprehensive development tools.

Download Ranorex Studio vs. Telerik Test Studio Report

Pricing

Ranorex Studio has a higher setup cost, while Telerik Test Studio offers a more cost-effective initial setup, making the latter a more budget-friendly option in terms of setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Ranorex Studio has a higher setup cost, while Telerik Test Studio offers a more cost-effective initial setup, making the latter a more budget-friendly option in terms of setup expenses.

Testim

4.6 out of 5

Testim

4.6 out of 5

Telerik Test Studio offers strong integration and reporting, suitable for enterprises seeking detailed solutions. In comparison, Testim focuses on AI-driven adaptability and speed, ideal for agile teams. Users choose based on their need for comprehensive analytics or fast, flexible automation.

Download Telerik Test Studio vs. Testim Report

Pricing

Telerik Test Studio offers a competitive setup cost, allowing for efficient test automation deployment. Testim provides a scalable pricing model with various options, highlighting flexibility for diverse testing needs.

View comparison

Pricing

Qt Squish

4.4 out of 5

Qt Squish

4.4 out of 5

Qt Squish is preferred for its cross-platform flexibility and scripting language support. In comparison, Telerik Test Studio offers advanced test management and integration capabilities. Qt Squish suits technical teams, while Telerik Test Studio appeals to organizations valuing ease of deployment and comprehensive features.

Download Qt Squish vs. Telerik Test Studio Report

Pricing

Qt Squish's setup cost is lower, focusing on powerful scripting and automation capabilities, whereas Telerik Test Studio offers a straightforward setup with comprehensive test management features.

View comparison

Pricing

Qt Squish's setup cost is lower, focusing on powerful scripting and automation capabilities, whereas Telerik Test Studio offers a straightforward setup with comprehensive test management features.

UiPath Test Cloud

4.0 out of 5

UiPath Test Cloud

4.0 out of 5

Telerik Test Studio offers cost-effective solutions with excellent support, making it ideal for budget-conscious projects. In comparison, UiPath Test Cloud's advanced AI capabilities and cloud integration appeal to tech buyers seeking innovative test automation and scalability despite higher initial costs.

Download Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report

Pricing

Telerik Test Studio offers competitive setup costs, while UiPath Test Cloud presents a more streamlined and potentially less expensive initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Telerik Test Studio offers competitive setup costs, while UiPath Test Cloud presents a more streamlined and potentially less expensive initial setup.

Show 2 more products

Related categories

Functional Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

Regression Testing Tools