Telerik Test Studio vs Worksoft Certify comparison

Progress Software and Worksoft are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Progress Software is ranked #25, while Worksoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5. Progress Software holds a 1.3% mindshare in TAt, compared to Worksoft’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Worksoft users who would recommend it.

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,330 Views
678 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Worksoft Certify

Read 77 Worksoft Certify reviews

3,862 Views
2,897 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Worksoft Certify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Worksoft Certify and Telerik Test Studio are competing automation testing tools in the business process testing category. Telerik Test Studio appears to have the upper hand due to its feature-rich environment and user-friendly approach despite its pricing.

Features: Worksoft Certify offers capabilities in testing SAP ERP, a no-code solution for automation, and comprehensive SAP integration. Telerik Test Studio provides extensive test automation features with web, desktop, and mobile testing, and generates scripts with ease. Its versatility and user-friendly design make it a favored option for many users.

Room for Improvement: Worksoft Certify can improve by enhancing cross-platform support, reducing complexity in integration with non-SAP applications, and offering more flexible licensing options. Telerik Test Studio could benefit from reducing initial setup costs, enhancing integration with third-party tools, and expanding the scope of automated testing beyond current limits.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Worksoft Certify enables rapid deployment in SAP environments with strong customer support for pre-sales and implementation. Telerik Test Studio is recognized for its simplicity in setup and its intuitive interface combined with comprehensive customer support. Telerik's model stands out in terms of ease and user accessibility.

Pricing and ROI: Worksoft Certify typically incurs higher setup costs but provides a strong ROI, particularly for large enterprises. Telerik Test Studio offers a more cost-effective initial setup, promising solid ROI through scalable features. Its lower entry cost and flexible pricing are appealing for businesses seeking immediate return on investment benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Telerik Test Studio vs. Worksoft Certify Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. Worksoft Certify

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (14th), Regression Testing Tools (11th)

Worksoft Certify

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 3.3%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Worksoft Certify	3.3%
Telerik Test Studio	1.3%
Other	95.4%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Chirag N M

Senior Quality Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Supports multiple platforms and identifies elements in a good way

Instead of Telerik Test Studio, I'd recommend writing test cases in .Net so that in the future, if you move away from Telerik Test Studio to another tool, it would be easier for you. Your current code would be reusable. You won't have to change your test cases much. We wrote our code in a separate IDE, which was Visual Studio, and internally, we had the infrastructure to interact with Telerik Test Studio. All the internal logic that we needed for our purpose was implemented in .NET, and we used Telerik Test Studio for tests. I'd rate Telerik Test Studio an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Muddisetty Arun Kumar

WorkSoft Certified Automation Engineer at Qualesce

Automation has delivered strong ROI with AI-driven test prioritization and parallel reporting

The best feature of Worksoft Certify is the automatic report generation. Unlike traditional tools like Selenium or Java-based frameworks where reporting often requires custom coding, Certify handles this natively. We are currently utilizing the 14.5 version, which has modernized these capabilities, though we frequently manage backward compatibility for clients still running on the 12.x version series.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"I have not seen any stability issues."

"I would say Worksoft Certify is good and the best one to date when automating an SAP platform."

"I will always recommend Worksoft Certify to others if they are working on enterprise applications because it is easy to use and time-saving."

"What I like about Worksoft Certify is that end-to-end testing becomes faster."

"I can confirm that Worksoft Certify brings measurable benefits in terms of cost saving, time saving, resource saving, and efficiency improvements in my projects."

"It is very easy to maintain. With scripts, I can change one line and in one step. Whatever I want, I can do. I don't need to be an expert to use it."

"Certify's web UI testing abilities for testing of modern applications like SAP Fiori was good when we started and they developed it to be even better. We all know that web applications can change objects in DOM quite fast and it breaks tests. To counter it Certify has made object recognition more flexible and generic, so we don't have any troubles."

"The tool itself is highly effective, especially when it comes to comprehensibility for newcomers."

More Worksoft Certify pros

Cons

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"Technical support's first response to us is usually late."

"Capture 2.0 is not as useful when you get into more mature automation."

"Some features are missing from a testing perspective. You need to know how to connect everything to create requirements and stability metrics for the routine."

"The technical support comes on, and says, "Oh, so-and-so link is here, go through that link, and make the modifications." I'm not comfortable in making those changes. I want to schedule a call, share my screen, and have them fix it for me."

"Our interactions with technical support has not been the best always and there is room for improvement especially with respect to the time taken to respond to cases. However, with the right contacts and reasonable escalations we have always managed to get quick attention on our cases."

"The definitions for the objects need to be automated. They need to be recognized automatically by Worksoft Certify instead of changing them back and forth manually. This is also something that Worksoft is currently working on."

"The problem with Worksoft Certify is that it's not always stable. It runs on a live platform that's constantly changing, so the test script needs to be adjusted every time, which is very painful."

"It is poor for a web based application."

More Worksoft Certify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"We've saved over 80 percent in time savings."

"We saved $1.3 million using Worksoft Certify in 2017."

"The initial upfront cost in terms of licenses, plus all the money that we spent developing tests, has proven it's worth. Now, we can do a regression test suite in ten days as opposed to sixteen weeks."

"Worksoft Capture 2.0 can help our customers to accelerate their automation development at least 40 percent faster than any other commercial tools available in the market."

"I don't have much idea about the pricing, but it is a licensed tool, and it is somewhat costly."

"Saving money and better quality, these are the benefits of Certify."

"This solution has enabled us to automate in order to tremendously save time. Only first time when you are recording and creating the script will you spend some time with it, the rest of the time, you are just executing."

"We ended up buying too many licenses. They were very good at selling it to us, and probably oversold it a little. We bought 45 licenses and have never used more than twenty. However, they gave us a pretty significant discount on the bigger license, so it made sense for us to buy enough that we wouldn't have to go back and ask for more."

More Worksoft Certify pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

15%

Retailer

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	65

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Worksoft Certify?

A specific feature that I found to be the most valuable in the solution for our company's work processes stems from the fact that it is useful as a low-code automation tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify?

I find the pricing not expensive at all as it depends on how many users will be required.

See all answers

Comparisons

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 11% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 6% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 6% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 43% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 7% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 6% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 3% of the time

More Worksoft Certify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

January 2026

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

Worksoft Certify

January 2026

Download Worksoft Certify product report

Overview

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation for efficient test scripting by non-programmers. It integrates with SAP, supports multiple interfaces, and ensures seamless end-to-end testing, facilitating time savings and streamlined operations.

Worksoft Certify stands out for its unique codeless automation capabilities, enabling users without programming skills to easily create automated test scripts. Its Capture feature effortlessly records user actions, accelerating test development. Integration with SAP systems and support across various interfaces make it highly versatile. The tool's architecture allows for easy script maintenance and decouples scripts from data, speeding up testing processes while minimizing manual effort. Although it's known for excellence in automating SAP applications, there is room for improvement in areas like web and mobile integration, UI enhancements, and support responsiveness.

What are the key features of Worksoft Certify?

Codeless Automation: Enables easy script creation without coding skills.
Capture Feature: Records actions for rapid test development.
SAP Integration: Ensures seamless operation within SAP environments.
Interface Support: Enhances versatility across multiple platforms.
End-to-End Testing: Facilitates comprehensive testing cycles.

What are the benefits and ROI to consider?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces testing time.
Reduced Manual Intervention: Minimizes errors and enhances efficiency.
Supporting Transformations: Aids large-scale SAP and cloud transformations.
Scalability: Handles large datasets with stability and reliability.
Maintenance: Decoupled scripts ensure easy updates and management.

In industries relying on SAP and ERP systems, Worksoft Certify serves as a valuable tool for automating regression and integration testing. Organizations benefit from reduced manual testing effort and faster project delivery times. It's extensively utilized in sectors requiring large-scale SAP deployment and cloud application integration, making it integral in streamlining business operations.

Worksoft

Sample Customers

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. Worksoft Certify

January 2026

Free Report: Telerik Test Studio vs. Worksoft Certify

Find out what your peers are saying about Telerik Test Studio vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Telerik Test Studio vs. Worksoft Certify report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.