Telerik Test Studio vs Worksoft Certify comparison

Progress Software and Worksoft are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Progress Software is ranked #25, while Worksoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5. Progress Software holds a 1.3% mindshare in TAt, compared to Worksoft’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Worksoft users who would recommend it.

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,330 Views
678 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Worksoft Certify

Read 77 Worksoft Certify reviews

3,862 Views
2,897 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Worksoft Certify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Worksoft Certify and Telerik Test Studio are competing automation testing tools in the business process testing category. Telerik Test Studio appears to have the upper hand due to its feature-rich environment and user-friendly approach despite its pricing.

Features: Worksoft Certify offers capabilities in testing SAP ERP, a no-code solution for automation, and comprehensive SAP integration. Telerik Test Studio provides extensive test automation features with web, desktop, and mobile testing, and generates scripts with ease. Its versatility and user-friendly design make it a favored option for many users.

Room for Improvement: Worksoft Certify can improve by enhancing cross-platform support, reducing complexity in integration with non-SAP applications, and offering more flexible licensing options. Telerik Test Studio could benefit from reducing initial setup costs, enhancing integration with third-party tools, and expanding the scope of automated testing beyond current limits.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Worksoft Certify enables rapid deployment in SAP environments with strong customer support for pre-sales and implementation. Telerik Test Studio is recognized for its simplicity in setup and its intuitive interface combined with comprehensive customer support. Telerik's model stands out in terms of ease and user accessibility.

Pricing and ROI: Worksoft Certify typically incurs higher setup costs but provides a strong ROI, particularly for large enterprises. Telerik Test Studio offers a more cost-effective initial setup, promising solid ROI through scalable features. Its lower entry cost and flexible pricing are appealing for businesses seeking immediate return on investment benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Telerik Test Studio vs. Worksoft Certify Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. Worksoft Certify

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (14th), Regression Testing Tools (11th)

Worksoft Certify

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 3.3%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Worksoft Certify	3.3%
Telerik Test Studio	1.3%
Other	95.4%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Chirag N M

Senior Quality Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Supports multiple platforms and identifies elements in a good way

Instead of Telerik Test Studio, I'd recommend writing test cases in .Net so that in the future, if you move away from Telerik Test Studio to another tool, it would be easier for you. Your current code would be reusable. You won't have to change your test cases much. We wrote our code in a separate IDE, which was Visual Studio, and internally, we had the infrastructure to interact with Telerik Test Studio. All the internal logic that we needed for our purpose was implemented in .NET, and we used Telerik Test Studio for tests. I'd rate Telerik Test Studio an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Muddisetty Arun Kumar

WorkSoft Certified Automation Engineer at Qualesce

Automation has delivered strong ROI with AI-driven test prioritization and parallel reporting

The best feature of Worksoft Certify is the automatic report generation. Unlike traditional tools like Selenium or Java-based frameworks where reporting often requires custom coding, Certify handles this natively. We are currently utilizing the 14.5 version, which has modernized these capabilities, though we frequently manage backward compatibility for clients still running on the 12.x version series.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"It is a pretty easy tool to use as far as automated testing tools go."

"The tool is easy to use. It is a drag and drop Microsoft type of solution."

"What I like about Worksoft Certify is that end-to-end testing becomes faster."

"The biggest feature is the fact that it's codeless. It takes away the problem of finding people with the correct programming language, since there are multiple such languages. It saves time in introducing people to the solution because they don't need programming knowledge, they just need to be able to think logically. This makes it vastly usable by more people who are not even acquainted with IT at all."

"Provides all the in-built functionalities and is a wonderful tool."

"Worksoft Certify has improved my organization by initially enabling us to transition from manual testers to automation, enhancing productivity by 50%."

"We were able to use Worksoft to automate all of the actions that we would have to take after an SAP refresh. This way we do the refresh, then that night or right afterwards, we run the Worksoft script and it resets all of our testing users. This sets them up with the right access, the right approvals, and just sets up everything on the back-end so we can do our scripts the next night."

"It helps us to implement automation testing as part of most projects, so the need for manual testing can be reduced. This really accelerates the testing process as a whole. Before, where it could take ten days to test a project, now it takes only one or two days to do the complete testing."

More Worksoft Certify pros

Cons

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"I would like to know which version of Worksoft Certify is being used and how the tools are going to work."

"The product had some UI issues."

"From the features perspective, I find that there are functionalities missing in Worksoft Certify at the moment that I would like to see included in the future."

"The technical support of the product is an area of concern where certain improvements are required."

"Worksoft Certify's support team should respond more promptly when we are stuck with certain issues and looking for a solution."

"We ran into some issues with the version that we were on during the initial setup. We ran into a bug on one version, then they upgraded us to a new version, and we got hit with another bug. So, they had to put us in a beta. That was a little frustrating. However, besides the bugs that we ran into, the install was pretty straightforward."

"Technical support's first response to us is usually late."

"Based on my colleagues' feedback, there are still some minor issues concerning continuous testing, particularly related to the timeout feature."

More Worksoft Certify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"Automating our manual processes has saved us 70 to 80 percent in time."

"Purchasing and licensing are okay. Go for the perpetual licenses. In that way, you own a license, then you can purchase maintenance and support on top of that, so you don't have to pay every year for it. Even if you don't want it a contract with Worksoft Certify in the future, you will have your own license of it. Then, if your usage is not that much, you can have one or two perpetual licenses. However, if you want to run your processes, you will need more licenses, e.g., using the run-only licenses. They are really cheap compared to the full licensing."

"I can only judge based on the situation that we had around six years ago when we did the tool evaluation. Worksoft was not the cheapest, but it provided the value. For 25 concurrent licenses, we paid more than €400,000, so it was not cheap. In the end, if you see how much time you are saving and compare it with others, its price is okay. We had also compared its cost with the licensing costs for HP and Tricentis, and they were at another level. Now, as we have already booked the licenses, we only have to pay an annual maintenance fee, which is 70%, and that is okay."

"This solution has enabled us to automate in order to tremendously save time. Only first time when you are recording and creating the script will you spend some time with it, the rest of the time, you are just executing."

"The initial investment is probably a little high. It was a little hard for me to sell, but it was a one-shot deal and that's why it's so high. All we are doing now is paying annual maintenance, which we don't have to do if we don't want upgrades, but we do."

"Worksoft Certify is priced higher than most tools."

"Our ROI is primarily a reduction in testing time. The testing, when we were doing it manually, was 30 to 40 percent of the project's cost."

"Cost-wise, compared with other tools, it is a great product."

More Worksoft Certify pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

15%

Retailer

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	65

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Worksoft Certify?

A specific feature that I found to be the most valuable in the solution for our company's work processes stems from the fact that it is useful as a low-code automation tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify?

I find the pricing not expensive at all as it depends on how many users will be required.

See all answers

Comparisons

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 11% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 6% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 6% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 43% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 7% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 6% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 3% of the time

More Worksoft Certify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

January 2026

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

Worksoft Certify

January 2026

Download Worksoft Certify product report

Overview

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation for efficient test scripting by non-programmers. It integrates with SAP, supports multiple interfaces, and ensures seamless end-to-end testing, facilitating time savings and streamlined operations.

Worksoft Certify stands out for its unique codeless automation capabilities, enabling users without programming skills to easily create automated test scripts. Its Capture feature effortlessly records user actions, accelerating test development. Integration with SAP systems and support across various interfaces make it highly versatile. The tool's architecture allows for easy script maintenance and decouples scripts from data, speeding up testing processes while minimizing manual effort. Although it's known for excellence in automating SAP applications, there is room for improvement in areas like web and mobile integration, UI enhancements, and support responsiveness.

What are the key features of Worksoft Certify?

Codeless Automation: Enables easy script creation without coding skills.
Capture Feature: Records actions for rapid test development.
SAP Integration: Ensures seamless operation within SAP environments.
Interface Support: Enhances versatility across multiple platforms.
End-to-End Testing: Facilitates comprehensive testing cycles.

What are the benefits and ROI to consider?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces testing time.
Reduced Manual Intervention: Minimizes errors and enhances efficiency.
Supporting Transformations: Aids large-scale SAP and cloud transformations.
Scalability: Handles large datasets with stability and reliability.
Maintenance: Decoupled scripts ensure easy updates and management.

In industries relying on SAP and ERP systems, Worksoft Certify serves as a valuable tool for automating regression and integration testing. Organizations benefit from reduced manual testing effort and faster project delivery times. It's extensively utilized in sectors requiring large-scale SAP deployment and cloud application integration, making it integral in streamlining business operations.

Worksoft

Sample Customers

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. Worksoft Certify

January 2026

Free Report: Telerik Test Studio vs. Worksoft Certify

Find out what your peers are saying about Telerik Test Studio vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Telerik Test Studio vs. Worksoft Certify report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.