OpenText Functional Testing and Telerik Test Studio compete in the automated testing tools category. While OpenText Functional Testing offers lower initial costs, Telerik Test Studio holds the upper hand due to its versatile features and comprehensive testing capabilities.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing integrates well with enterprise environments, has strong test management capabilities, and supports a wide range of software, including web, desktop, and mobile apps. Telerik Test Studio features intuitive scripting options, extensive web application support, and advanced analytics for deeper insights.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing could enhance its user interface and expand its analytics capabilities. It also faces challenges with cloud-based environments. Telerik Test Studio could improve its cost structure for better accessibility, enhance its load-testing capabilities, and broaden its enterprise integrations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing offers a traditional deployment model that integrates well with enterprise systems and provides reliable customer support. Telerik Test Studio is praised for its user-friendly deployment in both cloud and on-premise environments and offers fast setup, benefiting teams needing quick implementation.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing has a lower entry cost, making it suitable for organizations seeking cost-effective solutions with predictable ROI. Telerik Test Studio involves higher initial investment but promises substantial long-term ROI due to its extensive features, which are great for organizations needing robust testing capabilities.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 7.1% |
| Telerik Test Studio | 1.4% |
| Other | 91.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
