Telerik Test Studio and Galen Framework are key players in automated testing tools. While each offers unique advantages, Galen Framework shows a strength in responsive design testing, and Telerik Test Studio provides a more extensive suite of testing functionalities.
Features: Telerik Test Studio offers cross-browser testing, integration with other Telerik tools, and a codeless automation interface. Galen Framework focuses on layout and visual testing, ensuring consistent UI designs across devices. The contrast is in Galen's niche in layout testing, while Telerik covers a broad spectrum of automation needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Galen Framework, being open-source, is flexible for web developers, though it might require more technical expertise. Telerik Test Studio, a commercial product, ensures smoother deployment with dedicated customer support, catering well to enterprise environments.
Pricing and ROI: Galen Framework's open-source nature allows for a low initial setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious small to medium enterprises. Telerik Test Studio comes with a higher initial cost but offers extensive features and expert support, which may deliver higher ROI for companies seeking comprehensive testing solutions.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Telerik Test Studio | 1.4% |
| Galen Framework | 0.8% |
| Other | 97.8% |
Layout testing seemed always a complex task. Galen Framework offers a simple solution: test location of objects relatively to each other on page. Using a special syntax and comprehensive rules you can describe any layout you can imagine.
Galen Framework runs well in Selenium Grid. You can set up your tests to run in a cloud like Sauce Labs or BrowserStack so that you can even test your responsive websites on different mobile devices. Galen can run multiple tests in parallel which is also a nice time saver.
Galen Framework is designed with responsivness in mind. It is easy to set up a test for different browser sizes. Galen just opens a browser, resizes it to a defined size and then tests the page according to specifications.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
