Terracotta vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

Software AG and Broadcom are both solutions in the Database Development and Management category. Software AG is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.0, while Broadcom is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6. Software AG holds a 0.9% mindshare in DDM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Software AG users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Terracotta

Read 1 Terracotta review

308 Views
283 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 84 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

4,408 Views
970 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Terracotta

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Terracotta and VMware Tanzu Data Solutions based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Quest Software, Oracle and others in Database Development and Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Database Development and Management Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Terracotta

Ranking in Database Development and Management

21st

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Database Development and Management

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (13th), Data Warehouse (9th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of Terracotta is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 2.7%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database Development and Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	2.7%
Terracotta	0.9%
Other	96.4%

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2727468

Senior Application Engineer at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Enhancing User Experience with Clustering While Potential Exists for Better Customization

My total experience with Terracotta is installing it in the architecture to do the clustering in WebMethods Integration Server. This provided to tackle the memory and the processes of those servers in the same pool. Terracotta, as per my understanding, is used for caching. The first function is used for clustering the requests. Regarding improvements, I cannot imagine what could be improved because my actual work in Integration Server is not totally restricted to Terracotta. The main function was restricted to developing services using integration servers in Software AG. The use of Terracotta is just for implementing caching. In this part, I create a cache manager for this response, and from a UI perspective, I am unable to suggest improvements.

Read full review

Moisés Guillén

Has improved server deployment speed and simplified Kubernetes cluster administration

My main use case for VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is Tanzu Basic TKB version 2.4 I focus on the creation of Kubernetes clusters with VMware Tanzu Data Solutions. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions has positively impacted my organization because it is efficient, easy, fast, and aids in the creation and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The impact of Terracotta's high availability and failover capabilities on the organization's data consistency and reliability is significant."

"Simple and straightforward admin portals: Made it easy for users and worked out excellently for our requirements"

"We chose Greenplum because of the architecture in terms of clustering databases and being able to have, or at least utilize the resources that are sitting on a database."

"The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable."

"Scalability is simple because it's an MPP database. If you need more processing power or you need more storage, you just add a few more nodes in the cluster. It works on common commodity hardware. You can use any type of server. You don't need to have proprietary hardware. It's fairly flexible."

"Very sophisticated routing control and priority messaging capabilities"

"The product's reliability is the most valuable feature."

"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."

"Some of the most valuable features are publish and subscribe, fanout, and queues."

Cons

"I know that we have many other solutions that do the same functionality as Terracotta. I don't recall the names of the products now, but I believe there are many products that may be better than Terracotta."

"The solution needs improvement on performance."

"I was struggling with installing a few things. It would be good if was somewhat similar to RedHat. There should be more documentation regarding installation troubleshooting."

"It will be very useful if we could communicate with other database types from Greenplum (using a database link)."

"Lacks sufficient inbuilt machine-learning functions for complex use cases."

"I saw some limitation with respect to the column store, and removing this would be an improvement."

"I would like to see the performance of the administration portal improved and additional messaging protocols."

"Extra filters would be helpful."

"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It’s an open-source solution."

"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."

"This is an open source solution."

"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."

"It is an open-source product."

"The product is available for free use since it is an open-source technology."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Terracotta?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Terracotta?

Terracotta is actually a product used for clustering. It is not used standalone in architecture but is used in the Software AG architecture to cluster the request or state the request data between ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Terracotta?

I may not be the best one to provide advice, but during my experience with Terracotta, I didn't face major issues with this product. I recommend this product to be used in any architecture. On a sc...

See all answers

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware RabbitMQ?

RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the pro...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware RabbitMQ?

The product is free of cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Coherence vs Terracotta

Compared 53% of the time

Terracotta BigMemory vs Terracotta

Compared 20% of the time

More Terracotta Competitors

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 6% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

Snowflake vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

January 2026

Download Terracotta product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

January 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

No data available

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

Clock the fastest performance for operational and analytical workloads. Only with Software AG's Terracotta DB can you use one store for transactions and analytics - that's just smarter for real-time business. You no longer need to duplicate and move data for computations. And by moving data off the mainframe to in-memory, not only can you access data lightening-fast, you also can drastically reduce MIPS costs.

Software AG

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Kiabi, Wipro Technologies, CERN, Essent, Nielsen

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Quest Software, Oracle and others in Database Development and Management. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.