Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Terracotta vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Terracotta
Ranking in Database Development and Management
20th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions
Ranking in Database Development and Management
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
Relational Databases Tools (12th), Data Warehouse (7th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of Terracotta is 0.5%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 2.8%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database Development and Management
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2727468 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing User Experience with Clustering While Potential Exists for Better Customization
My total experience with Terracotta is installing it in the architecture to do the clustering in WebMethods Integration Server. This provided to tackle the memory and the processes of those servers in the same pool. Terracotta, as per my understanding, is used for caching. The first function is used for clustering the requests. Regarding improvements, I cannot imagine what could be improved because my actual work in Integration Server is not totally restricted to Terracotta. The main function was restricted to developing services using integration servers in Software AG. The use of Terracotta is just for implementing caching. In this part, I create a cache manager for this response, and from a UI perspective, I am unable to suggest improvements.
Sushma Polavarapu - PeerSpot reviewer
Create essential reporting scripts with simplicity but has some operational challenges
We mainly create functions and scripts required for reporting The product is not complex; I do not have to create stored procedures, functions, or views. It's just simple to use. There is general room for improvement. I have been using it for five years. I have faced stability issues, mainly…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The impact of Terracotta's high availability and failover capabilities on the organization's data consistency and reliability is significant."
"It works very well with large database queries."
"The security is great."
"The solution can scale."
"RabbitMQ will help to remove a lot of the complexities and create a loosely coupled codebase."
"The message routing is the most valuable feature. It is effective and flexible."
"The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network."
"Helps us to achieve large-scale analytics."
"The product has been stable and I have never faced any kind of problems with it."
 

Cons

"I know that we have many other solutions that do the same functionality as Terracotta. I don't recall the names of the products now, but I believe there are many products that may be better than Terracotta."
"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."
"Implementing a circuit breaker scenario using RabbitMQ is complicated. This complexity arises because manual intervention is required to manage worker details and handle operations based on worker IP addresses."
"The next release should include some of the flexibility and features that Kafka offers."
"They should add more analytics. Their documentation could also be improved so that I don't have to bother my co-workers and tech support so often."
"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."
"The product has to improve the crisis management, especially in memory issues."
"The installation is difficult and should be made easier."
"The initial deployment was a little difficult."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product is available for free use since it is an open-source technology."
"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."
"Tanzu Greenplum's pricing is really competitive and gives excellent value for money."
"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."
"It is an open-source platform. Although, we have to pay for additional features."
"It is an open-source product."
"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."
"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?
IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Greenplum?
It’s an open-source solution. There are no expenses for using it.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Kiabi, Wipro Technologies, CERN, Essent, Nielsen
General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, Nutanix and others in Database Development and Management. Updated: June 2025.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.