Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Terracotta vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Terracotta
Ranking in Database Development and Management
22nd
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions
Ranking in Database Development and Management
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
84
Ranking in other categories
Relational Databases Tools (14th), Data Warehouse (9th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of Terracotta is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 2.7%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database Development and Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions2.7%
Terracotta0.8%
Other96.5%
Database Development and Management
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2727468 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Application Engineer at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Enhancing User Experience with Clustering While Potential Exists for Better Customization
My total experience with Terracotta is installing it in the architecture to do the clustering in WebMethods Integration Server. This provided to tackle the memory and the processes of those servers in the same pool. Terracotta, as per my understanding, is used for caching. The first function is used for clustering the requests. Regarding improvements, I cannot imagine what could be improved because my actual work in Integration Server is not totally restricted to Terracotta. The main function was restricted to developing services using integration servers in Software AG. The use of Terracotta is just for implementing caching. In this part, I create a cache manager for this response, and from a UI perspective, I am unable to suggest improvements.
Moisés Guillén - PeerSpot reviewer
VMware vSphere | Horizon View | Citrix Virtual Apps | Microsoft Intune | Azure | SCCM | Windows 365 at Adecco
Has improved server deployment speed and simplified Kubernetes cluster administration
My main use case for VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is Tanzu Basic TKB version 2.4 I focus on the creation of Kubernetes clusters with VMware Tanzu Data Solutions. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions has positively impacted my organization because it is efficient, easy, fast, and aids in the creation and…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The impact of Terracotta's high availability and failover capabilities on the organization's data consistency and reliability is significant."
"Reliability for the messages is key. RabbitMQ ensures your messages are safe. They are not deleted and stuff."
"We chose Greenplum because of the architecture in terms of clustering databases and being able to have, or at least utilize the resources that are sitting on a database."
"Helps us to achieve large-scale analytics."
"The solution is stable."
"It's super easy to deploy and it also supports different languages and analytics."
"VMware Tanzu Data Solutions has positively impacted my organization because it is efficient, easy, fast, and aids in the creation and administration of web servers."
"The parallel load features mean that Greenplum is capable of high-volume data loading in parallel to all of the cluster segments, which is really valuable."
"The message routing is the most valuable feature. It is effective and flexible."
 

Cons

"I know that we have many other solutions that do the same functionality as Terracotta. I don't recall the names of the products now, but I believe there are many products that may be better than Terracotta."
"It doesn't have any GUI-based monitoring tools."
"VMware RabbitMQ's configuration process could be easier to understand."
"Implementation takes a long time."
"They should add more analytics. Their documentation could also be improved so that I don't have to bother my co-workers and tech support so often."
"The product has to improve the crisis management, especially in memory issues."
"The initial deployment was a little difficult."
"I would like to see the performance of the administration portal improved and additional messaging protocols."
"Initial setup is a little complex. It took around two weeks to deploy."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."
"It’s an open-source solution."
"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."
"We are using the open-source version of this solution."
"The pricing is okay."
"Since the tool is an open-source product, there is no need to pay anything."
"are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."
"This is an open source solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business30
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise49
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Terracotta?
My total experience with Terracotta is installing it in the architecture to do the clustering in WebMethods Integration Server. This provided to tackle the memory and the processes of those servers...
What is your primary use case for Terracotta?
Terracotta is actually a product used for clustering. It is not used standalone in architecture but is used in the Software AG architecture to cluster the request or state the request data between ...
What advice do you have for others considering Terracotta?
I may not be the best one to provide advice, but during my experience with Terracotta, I didn't face major issues with this product. I recommend this product to be used in any architecture. On a sc...
How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?
IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...
What do you like most about VMware RabbitMQ?
RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the pro...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Kiabi, Wipro Technologies, CERN, Essent, Nielsen
General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Quest Software, Oracle and others in Database Development and Management. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.