Testim vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

Testim and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Testim is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.7, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Testim holds a 5.2% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Testim users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Testim

Read 10 Testim reviews

3,038 Views
2,151 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 24 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

2,626 Views
1,579 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Testim

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 19, 2025

Testim and UiPath Test Cloud are prominent players in the test automation domain. Testim is noted for its pricing model and customer support, while UiPath Test Cloud is praised for its comprehensive features, making it a more extensive testing solution.

Features: Testim is known for AI-driven test automation that simplifies scalability and implements self-healing tests, which reduces maintenance efforts. Additionally, its smart locator feature effectively manages dynamic elements in UI, ensuring reliable test scripts. The ease of recording and playback minimizes the need for extensive coding. UiPath Test Cloud, conversely, offers significant integration capabilities and a broad range of test execution options. Its ability to automate diverse scenarios and integrate with existing systems provides an advantage for complex enterprise environments. UiPath's low-code platform also supports both desktop and web applications.

Room for Improvement: Testim could enhance its offering by expanding integration capabilities with third-party applications for more extensive testing strategies. More built-in support for non-standard testing environments might attract users who require custom setups. Improving report customization could help users better analyze test outcomes. UiPath Test Cloud can streamline its setup process to encourage faster deployment, and reducing the initial learning curve can attract users new to automation. It could also benefit from enhancing support resources to simplify complex integration scenarios. Expanding detailed logging and documentation could further aid in troubleshooting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Testim is favored for its straightforward, cloud-based deployment that eases onboarding, supported by commendable customer service. This ensures a seamless transition to automation. In contrast, UiPath Test Cloud involves a more intricate setup but compensates with extensive resource access to navigate deployment challenges. Its emphasis on support infrastructure helps manage these complexities effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Testim's competitive pricing makes it an attractive option, particularly for those looking for cost-efficient solutions, contributing to a significant ROI with minimal upfront investment. On the other hand, UiPath Test Cloud requires a larger financial commitment initially but offers substantial ROI through its robust feature set, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive testing capabilities. This investment is justified by its potential to save on long-term costs, making it viable for businesses seeking deep integration and expansive functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Testim vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Testim vs. UiPath Test Cloud

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (7th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Testim is 5.2%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 5.0%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

PiyushSingh

Director at Xceedance

A stable tool to help users take care of the implementation phases in their environment

There are a few minor areas where improvements are required, but they are not something that I can discuss at a high level. I will have to ask the team that uses Testim since they can give a better response to what requires improvement in the product. I only manage the team that uses Testim. I cannot be exactly described as an end user of the tool. There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it. There were some trial and error methods our company had to deal with while using the product's documentation, after which we were able to get through the setup phase. I want the documentation to have more information to help users with the setup process. I want the product to be more scalable in the future.

Read full review

Deborah Yarosh

VP Technology Automation at Finance Of America Mortgage LLC

Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement

UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment. The QA Manager needs to track which tests have been completed, the success rate, and other relevant information. The ability to have manual tests show up in multiple projects is a requirement that is not easily done in Test Suite. We have submitted the following enhancements request to UiPath and are waiting for them to address these issues before migrating our manual testing to the UiPath Test Suite platform. * Ability to import manual test cases from an Excel Spreadsheet. * Ability to create release folders and have manual tests under the folders (sub-folders are also needed). * Ability to copy tests between projects (manual and automated). * Ability to execute manual test cases in any order and skip tests if needed. * Ability to assign and see who has been assigned to test cases – need to know who created the test case and who executed the test case as they could be different people. * Ability for the QA manager to see which test cases have been run and which haven’t as well as which ones were successful, and which weren’t. * Ability for the QA manager to track defect cycles for a particular release. * Improving Search functionality – must enter the exact test case name in current search functionality. * Ability to extract key data for artifacts for Release Management or Audit* Test Set or Individual Cases, * Include Test Results (passed / failed), * Include how many iterations a test case went through until it passed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a highly stable solution."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

"The product is easy to use."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."

"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."

More Testim pros

"The document understanding is good."

"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."

"It is feature-rich. It has more features than other RPA tools."

"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."

"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."

"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."

"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."

"UiPath Test Suite is user-friendly and operates as a low-code platform."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

More Testim cons

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath to test on it, which is inefficient."

"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."

"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."

"The pricing isn't as low as other options."

"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The solution is not expensive."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"It represents good value for the investment."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it. Although justified by the solution's capability, excessive costs should not be necessary...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 52% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 21% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 11% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Testim

Compared 1% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 44% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 20% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Testim

March 2025

Download Testim product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

March 2025

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Testim

UiPath Test Cloud revolutionizes testing through advanced AI agents, enhancing productivity in software assessment.

UiPath Test Cloud, with its AI-augmented automation, offers testers enterprise-grade capabilities for over 190 technologies. Featuring seamless integration with tools like Orchestrator and CI/CD pipelines, it streamlines testing processes and cuts maintenance costs. While users value its functionalities, the need for enhancements in mobile automation and third-party integration, particularly with Jira, is recognized. Efficient test organization through Test Manager and simplified process management via the cloud are noteworthy. Enhancements in reporting and file management are sought, highlighting areas for development.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Drag-and-Drop Programming: Enables easy test creation with minimal technical knowledge.
Robust Robotic Functionality: Offers reliable automation across a wide array of technologies.
API Integration: Ensures seamless connectivity with existing systems.
Detailed Logging: Provides comprehensive logs for better analysis and debugging.
Test Manager: Organizes tests efficiently and simplifies management.

What benefits should users evaluate in UiPath Test Cloud?

Enhanced Productivity: Accelerates test creation and execution.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces manual effort and maintenance expenses.
Cross-Platform Support: Offers flexibility in testing across different environments.
Improved Quality: Delivers high-quality software with speed and efficiency.

Organizations across industries utilize UiPath Test Cloud for testing types such as origination, smoke, and web application testing. Common implementations include testing in supply chain management, regression testing, and integrating workflows. Teams find it beneficial for ensuring functionality and efficiency in mobile app testing, enabling cross-platform support for RPA and applications like Oracle and SAP.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Testim vs. UiPath Test Cloud

March 2025

Free Report: Testim vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Testim vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Testim vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.