Tintri Global Center [EOL] vs Zabbix comparison

"The Tintri product line as a whole has freed up a lot of resources from constant administration of legacy enterprise storage."

"The best feature is that Zabbix can report everything, and everything in Zabbix is free."

"Every new asset placed in the environment can be automatically detected, predicting human failures."

"If you are serious about your infrastructure then you have to know what is going on, and with Zabbix we know when servers are using too much CPU, memory, disk IO, etc., and besides getting notified when something goes wrong, we are also now aware of how well our infrastructure scales, something that can save us money and frustrations."

"During my testing, the features that I like the most are that it can be integrated with my system, and it provides me with reports of all of my servers."

"The basic setup is very easy."

"We value the auto-host discovery, template import, bulk import/export features. Newer versions also add nice features, such as multi-IP per host."

"Zabbix can use old data to current data to set the threshold. We can use previous data to set the threshold."

"Scalability, everything can be monitored."

"A better Tintri would be a "cheaper" one to get things started again."

"Overall, setting up Zabbix is a challenge."

"The APM monitoring has room for improvement, although I hear that the new 5.2 version has some improvements in that area, and I'd like to give that a go. I would like to see a few more templates out there for different styles of monitoring. I use the Grafana interface for reporting. I would also like it to have an out-of-the-box ability to email reports. You can create reports, but to be able to email those reports would be really helpful. I've got users who are not interested in logging in and generating a report. They want it all pre-canned and sent to an email address. It would also be really handy if we could pin certain reports up onto platforms such as Teams or SharePoint. A GUI for the proxy server would be cool to have for debugging purposes and for the support teams to have a look at, but I don't know whether that's really feasible to do. I get enough from the log files themselves."

"For our company, it is not scalable."

"I had problems using Zabbix when working with SUSE Enterprise; many companies use SUSE."

"To improve Zabbix, adding more features to support the monitoring of modern workloads like containers would be beneficial."

"The user interface could be better."

"The only improvement I would suggest, revolves around its AI and ML capabilities."

"I think ZABBIX needs improved report functions."

"This solution is completely open-source, so it is quite affordable."

"There is a license required for this solution and we pay annually for our license."

"The tool's licensing is good."

"Zabbix is free but if you use it in production then you have to pay for it."

"If you have 20,000 hosts, the support costs around €95,000 for a year."

"This is an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"The product is an open source and free solution."

"Zabbix is an open-source tool, and it's free to use."