Tyk vs WSO2 API Manager comparison

Tyk and WSO2 are both solutions in the API Management category. Tyk is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0, while WSO2 is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Tyk holds a 2.0% mindshare in APIM, compared to WSO2’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Tyk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Tyk

Read 7 Tyk reviews

1,980 Views
1,980 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

WSO2 API Manager

Read 42 WSO2 API Manager reviews

4,974 Views
4,875 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Tyk

WSO2 API Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Tyk and WSO2 API Manager are competing products in the API management space. Tyk leads in pricing and support, while WSO2 API Manager is superior in features, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Tyk provides lightweight API management with an open-source gateway, real-time analytics, and a developer portal. WSO2 API Manager includes identity and access management, in-depth analytics, and integration capabilities, offering a more comprehensive feature set for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Tyk could improve its cloud version limitations, maturity, and expandability. WSO2 API Manager may enhance newer API security features, initial setup complexity, and offer more intuitive orchestration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tyk is known for quick installation and straightforward configuration, benefiting from responsive support. WSO2 API Manager presents an enterprise-grade setup with extensive documentation and a comprehensive knowledge base, although deployment is more scalable, it may take longer.

Pricing and ROI: Tyk is cost-effective with a swift time to value, offering lower setup costs and immediate financial benefits. WSO2 API Manager requires a higher initial investment but delivers significant long-term value through its extensive features, supporting strategic growth despite higher expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Tyk vs. WSO2 API Manager Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Tyk vs. WSO2 API Manager

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Tyk

Ranking in API Management

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 API Manager

Ranking in API Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Tyk is 2.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 API Manager is 4.3%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WSO2 API Manager	4.3%
Tyk	2.0%
Other	93.7%

API Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2113719

Technical Support Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Internal API gateway has improved security frameworks and now provides unified API visibility

The best features Tyk offers are highly customizable options, effective traffic management, and security, making it easy to configure and use. The customizability of Tyk is evident in our validation of the token—specifically with our internal identity and access management. There were challenges on the network side and in managing token validity and the public key, but Tyk allowed us to configure these aspects effectively. I believe those are the standard out-of-the-box capabilities provided by Tyk that we are using, particularly regarding traffic management and security. Tyk has positively impacted my organization by providing standard API management capabilities, such as a single view for all APIs, discoverability, and role-based access control for overseeing who can see which APIs.

Read full review

Merna Muawad

Manager, Integration Technical Delivery at United Delta

Middleware integration has become smoother and manages API lifecycles and scopes effectively

Regarding WSO2 API Manager, I have no drawbacks or areas for improvement. However, regarding the Micro Integrator, I had some issues while developing complex services because it was mainly designed to be used for simple services, not complex ones. While using complex services, I encountered some issues. I communicated this with WSO2, and they released other products that solved everything related to my concern. These products were released before my concern was raised. When I explored them, they were pretty good, and I did not see the same issues I had experienced. WSO2 is enhancing themselves, and their products are fine. The previous concern was about the previous product, so it is resolved now since there are new products available. I would like WSO2 to improve quality or response time in support, or both.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Customer support is excellent, and their support personnel, along with professional services, know the product really well, resulting in a good experience dealing with them."

"You can set up workflows and write limited pieces of logic."

"The portal for developers that this solution provides has great functionality."

"The feature I find most valuable is that this solution allows us to manage our security."

"It is a good product for API management."

"The most valuable feature is the load balancing with the circuit-breaker function."

"The scalability is very good. That was a key factor in the selection, like how it could be pushed to high volume and scalability, which seemed to be very good."

"WSO2 API Manager's most valuable features are the simple interface that is easy to use and the APIs lifecycle."

"Helped us to quickly publish our Microservice APIs and enforcing different policies against them, it comes up with features like Security, Throttling policy and it provides complete access to customize API's which actually saves development effort and time."

"This solution is a little bit faster, easier to use, and has better integration than the other solutions I have experienced."

"The scalability is fine for our purposes."

"The main feature — the publication of the API, the management section — is great in general."

"WSO2 API Manager is easy to use."

"We could easily deploy APIs on WSO2 API Manager, and CORS configuration was easy to manage."

"It's very scalable, which is one of the best features."

More WSO2 API Manager pros

Cons

"We would like a better tool for generating documentation for the APIs to be developed."

"We ran it for a while, but then we decided to move away from Tyk, because Tyk's cloud version, the SaaS version, has a significant limitation of limited flexibility, so you can't program very much."

"I would like to see some additional features like having some extensions for .NET core because we use it for our back-end language."

"Sometimes when new features are released, they are not immediately stable."

"In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly better communication with the customer base that would be my main issue with them."

"Compared to Apigee or Kong, I find they excel beyond Tyk, which is the reason for my score."

"It is a young product and does not have the kind of brand recognition that would make it a more popular solution with our clients."

"API Manager is not easy to scale because some of its components lack scalability. It's a difficult point. Especially because companies are so cloud-based these days, microservice scalability is a major thing."

"The user interface needs to improve, it is a bit outdated."

"The initial setup can be difficult."

"They don't have different URLs for administrators."

"The product hasn’t been updated for some time."

"We found WSO2 API Manager to be a bit complex."

"In WSO2 API Manager, we had little flexibility and were restricted to a specific software or tool."

"I would like it to be a more stable solution. Maybe in the last version that is approved. For me it would be good if they had a community established version."

More WSO2 API Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are different versions and plans available depending on the requirements, so there is flexibility in terms of the pricing."

"We are using the open-source version of this product, so there are no licensing costs for its use."

"It had a free version, which suited many of our needs, but not all, but we were happy to go ahead with the licensed version as well, which is the paid version."

"The cost curve is far smoother, both in terms of volume and the number of calls it's running on, compared to most competitors. So it's a tad more expensive at the very low end, but the curve is nothing like Apigee or some of the others."

"The price is low compared to other products of a similar type."

"I am using the free version."

"It is costly, around ten thousand per year, per instance"

"WSO2 API Manager is a low-cost solution. It is one of the most affordable solutions."

"We use the open-source version of WSO2 API Manager, there is no cost."

"WSO2 API Manager is quite an expensive tool. I rate the product's pricing a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high."

"WSO2 API Manager is a costly solution, and its pricing is not competitive enough compared to other products."

"We use the open-source version — the free version."

"It's not expensive, but it could be cheaper."

More WSO2 API Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Tyk?

Tyk can improve in terms of AI capabilities, and the developer portal could benefit from enhancements such as user onboarding workflows. The developer community could be better, especially compared...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tyk?

My main use case for Tyk is for internal API gateway. For a banking customer, I have internal APIs and external APIs, where internal APIs are mostly on Kubernetes. For internal API gateway, we have...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tyk?

While we could not quantify any commercial improvement, developer experience has definitely improved. I would rate Tyk around an eight on a scale of one to ten because I have worked with other API ...

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 API Manager?

It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 API Manager?

We have encountered some concerns with concurrency. Our integrations do not handle high-volume transactions, and when benchmarking, some issues arose with concurrent testing. It is uncertain whethe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WSO2 API Manager?

We use WSO2 API Manager ( /products/wso2-api-manager-reviews ) to integrate our telecom products with third-party REST APIs. We are orchestrating services where our business process defines the int...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs Tyk

Compared 14% of the time

Traefik Enterprise vs Tyk

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Tyk

Compared 8% of the time

Apache APISIX vs Tyk

Compared 8% of the time

3scale API Management vs Tyk

Compared 8% of the time

More Tyk Competitors

Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 17% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 16% of the time

Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Gravitee vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More WSO2 API Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Tyk

January 2026

Download Tyk product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 API Manager

January 2026

Download WSO2 API Manager product report

Overview

Tyk is an open source API Gateway that is fast and scalable, an API management platform featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. Available in three flavours to best suit your architecture and governance. We offer full cloud or on-premises options, and the best of both worlds with our unique hybrid model. www.tyk.io

Tyk

WSO2 API Manager provides a flexible, open-source platform for API management, focusing on scalability, containerization, and ease of use in API publication, management, and lifecycle processes.

With robust security and strong integration capabilities, WSO2 API Manager supports microservices and API orchestration. Its advanced features include OAuth2 and identity access management, enhancing deployment, development, and operational efficiency. While praised for adaptability, users suggest improvements in installation, user interface simplicity, third-party integration, and documentation. Enhanced support, security, and expanded monitoring are also recommended alongside better module coordination and navigation. Performance optimization and refined caching mechanisms are valuable areas for growth.

What are the key features of WSO2 API Manager?

Flexibility and Open-Source Customization: Tailored API management for diverse business needs.
Scalability: Efficiently handles growing API demand and workloads.
Containerization: Simplifies deployment in cloud environments.
Robust Security: Protects API calls and ensures safe data exchange.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides insights into API performance and usage.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Efficient API Management: Streamlines API lifecycle from publication to retirement.
Improved Integration: Works seamlessly with microservices and identity services.
Operational Efficiency: Enhances development and deployment processes.
Data Security: Secures sensitive information through advanced protocols.

Enterprises utilize WSO2 API Manager for managing APIs in sectors such as banking, telecom, and SmartCity projects. Serving as a digital hub, it enables efficient API publication for internal and external users, ensuring effective API documentation and version control. Its flexibility in API management supports digital integration and service orchestration.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Trip Advisor, Juniper Networks, AT&T

1. eBay 2. StubHub 3. Cisco 4. Verizon 5. T-Mobile 6. Vodafone 7. Orange 8. BT Group 9. Telstra 10. Deutsche Telekom 11. Swisscom 12. AT&T 13. Sprint 14. Telefonica 15. O2 16. British Airways 17. Lufthansa 18. Emirates 19. Qatar Airways 20. Etihad Airways 21. Air France 22. KLM 23. American Express 24. Visa 25. Mastercard 26. PayPal 27. Western Union 28. Citibank 29. HSBC 30. Barclays 31. Santander 32. Goldman Sachs

Buyer's Guide

Tyk vs. WSO2 API Manager

December 2025

Free Report: Tyk vs. WSO2 API Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Tyk vs. WSO2 API Manager and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Tyk vs. WSO2 API Manager report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.