Tyk vs WSO2 API Manager comparison

Tyk and WSO2 are both solutions in the API Management category. Tyk is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while WSO2 is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8. Tyk holds a 2.0% mindshare in APIM, compared to WSO2’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Tyk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Tyk

Read 6 Tyk reviews

2,317 Views
1,847 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

WSO2 API Manager

Read 41 WSO2 API Manager reviews

6,187 Views
4,467 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Tyk

WSO2 API Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Tyk and WSO2 API Manager are competing in the API management category. Tyk's affordable pricing attracts smaller businesses, whereas WSO2's advanced features capture the interest of larger enterprises.

Features: Tyk offers strong cloud-native capabilities, user-friendly API management, and extensive analytics, making it ideal for microservices and scalable deployments. WSO2 API Manager excels in API security, integration capabilities, and comprehensive lifecycle management, making it a strong contender in enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement: Tyk could enhance its cloud version to mature its offerings and handle more complex enterprise needs. It would also benefit from increased feature maturity and expanded cloud functionalities. WSO2 could improve its deployment process and reduce its configuration complexity. It also needs better support for emerging API security features and token acceleration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tyk is favored for its quick, seamless integration with easy deployment and straightforward support. It suits environments seeking immediate, uncomplicated solutions. WSO2 requires more extensive configuration but allows deep customization. It benefits from thorough customer service during deployment, aiding enterprises with complex needs.

Pricing and ROI: Tyk offers cost-efficient, transparent pricing and lower initial setup costs, providing a good return on investment for budget-conscious businesses. WSO2, while having higher initial costs, offers significant ROI through its functional flexibility, appealing to enterprises willing to invest in a feature-rich solution.

To learn more, read our detailed Tyk vs. WSO2 API Manager Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Tyk vs. WSO2 API Manager

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Tyk

Ranking in API Management

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 API Manager

Ranking in API Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Tyk is 2.0%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 API Manager is 4.9%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

MarkDoherty

Founding Director at Point Group

Fastest to get up and running and fewer idiosyncrasies than competitors

In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly better communication with the customer base that would be my main issue with them. But as a product, it's very difficult to find any major faults.

Read full review

VishalSingh14

IT Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Easy to deploy APIs and easy to manage CORS configuration

I have used WSO2 Store and WSO2 API Manager at the architecture level. I worked on two versions, namely WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0 and 5.7.0. I have also worked with WSO2 Identity Server versions 5.7 and 5.11. There are certain things that Apigee handles better than WSO2 API Manager. The user interface of WSO2 API Manager is much easier than that of Apigee. The scope of flexibility was much greater in Apigee. In WSO2 API Manager, we had little flexibility and were restricted to a specific software or tool. On the other hand, we had the scope of customization in Apigee.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The portal for developers that this solution provides has great functionality."

"It is a good product for API management."

"The most valuable feature is the load balancing with the circuit-breaker function."

"The scalability is very good. That was a key factor in the selection, like how it could be pushed to high volume and scalability, which seemed to be very good."

"The feature I find most valuable is that this solution allows us to manage our security."

"You can set up workflows and write limited pieces of logic."

"One of the great things about WSO2 API Manager is that it is so easy to adopt. And because it's an open source solution, we're able to extend the implementation any time to suit our company needs better."

"The most beneficial feature of WSO2 API Manager is its capability to use Swagger to define and then populate the API."

"The user interface is easy to navigate, and the documentation is extensive. It's open-source, so everything is available, and we can create what we need. That's not necessarily a feature, but it's an advantage."

"The product is easy to use."

"It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability."

"Based on the information I have, the solution's most valuable feature is its capability of implementing custom solutions."

"We could easily deploy APIs on WSO2 API Manager, and CORS configuration was easy to manage."

"Functionality-wise, I like WSO2 API Manager - Publisher API and WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus."

More WSO2 API Manager pros

Cons

"Sometimes when new features are released, they are not immediately stable."

"I would like to see some additional features like having some extensions for .NET core because we use it for our back-end language."

"We ran it for a while, but then we decided to move away from Tyk, because Tyk's cloud version, the SaaS version, has a significant limitation of limited flexibility, so you can't program very much."

"In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly better communication with the customer base that would be my main issue with them."

"It is a young product and does not have the kind of brand recognition that would make it a more popular solution with our clients."

"We would like a better tool for generating documentation for the APIs to be developed."

"The product hasn’t been updated for some time."

"I would like it to be a more convenient development platform with the ability to write orchestrations and so on. Our problem with this product is that in my country, we are the only enterprise that has been using this product. We're missing a lot of knowledge from colleagues to consult with, and we also aren't able to recruit people with relevant skills. It is a big problem. The small team that is maintaining this product is the only team that can actually relate to any technical issue. The support that we're getting from the company is not great. There is also a cultural gap there because they're from Sri Lanka, and it is not easy. They're putting in a lot of effort, but they are not meeting our expectations."

"WSO2 API Manager can be improved a lot relating to usability"

"The professional support and licensing aspects of WSO have been a challenge."

"WSO2 API Manager should improve its marketplace subscription model and documentation in order to reach a higher level in the market."

"Based on our recent large scaling project, the latency needs to be improved."

"Lacks some new features and updated functionalities."

"WSO2 API Manager could improve the API approval system."

More WSO2 API Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost curve is far smoother, both in terms of volume and the number of calls it's running on, compared to most competitors. So it's a tad more expensive at the very low end, but the curve is nothing like Apigee or some of the others."

"It had a free version, which suited many of our needs, but not all, but we were happy to go ahead with the licensed version as well, which is the paid version."

"We are using the open-source version of this product, so there are no licensing costs for its use."

"There are different versions and plans available depending on the requirements, so there is flexibility in terms of the pricing."

"The price is low compared to other products of a similar type."

"As far as I'm aware, the costs are not minimal but satisfactory."

"It is an open-source product."

"WSO2 API Manager is a low-cost solution. It is one of the most affordable solutions."

"The solution costs less than 20,000 euros a year. I'm not sure of the exact number."

"I am using the free version."

"We have not opted for the paid version of WSO2 but we have implemented the free and open source WSO2 software to a great extent and it is working as per our expectation."

"We use the open-source version of WSO2 API Manager, there is no cost."

"We use the open-source version — the free version."

More WSO2 API Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

14%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

18%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Tyk?

The scalability is very good. That was a key factor in the selection, like how it could be pushed to high volume and scalability, which seemed to be very good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tyk?

The pricing is actually quite competitive. In Azure environments, it gets beaten by Microsoft API Gateway, but on the other hand, it offers some features that Microsoft lacks. So it really comes do...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tyk?

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 API Manager?

It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 API Manager?

We have encountered some concerns with concurrency. Our integrations do not handle high-volume transactions, and when benchmarking, some issues arose with concurrent testing. It is uncertain whethe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WSO2 API Manager?

We use WSO2 API Manager ( /products/wso2-api-manager-reviews ) to integrate our telecom products with third-party REST APIs. We are orchestrating services where our business process defines the int...

See all answers

Comparisons

Traefik Enterprise vs Tyk

Compared 16% of the time

Apache APISIX vs Tyk

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Tyk

Compared 11% of the time

Apigee vs Tyk

Compared 9% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Tyk

Compared 4% of the time

More Tyk Competitors

Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 22% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 18% of the time

Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 12% of the time

webMethods.io vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 2% of the time

More WSO2 API Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Tyk

April 2025

Download Tyk product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 API Manager

April 2025

Download WSO2 API Manager product report

Overview

Tyk is an open source API Gateway that is fast and scalable, an API management platform featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. Available in three flavours to best suit your architecture and governance. We offer full cloud or on-premises options, and the best of both worlds with our unique hybrid model. www.tyk.io

Tyk

WSO2 API Manager is a comprehensive platform that allows organizations to design, publish, and manage APIs.

It provides a centralized interface for API governance, security, and analytics.

With features like API monetization and developer portal, it enables businesses to drive innovation and create new revenue streams.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Trip Advisor, Juniper Networks, AT&T

1. eBay 2. StubHub 3. Cisco 4. Verizon 5. T-Mobile 6. Vodafone 7. Orange 8. BT Group 9. Telstra 10. Deutsche Telekom 11. Swisscom 12. AT&T 13. Sprint 14. Telefonica 15. O2 16. British Airways 17. Lufthansa 18. Emirates 19. Qatar Airways 20. Etihad Airways 21. Air France 22. KLM 23. American Express 24. Visa 25. Mastercard 26. PayPal 27. Western Union 28. Citibank 29. HSBC 30. Barclays 31. Santander 32. Goldman Sachs

Buyer's Guide

Tyk vs. WSO2 API Manager

April 2025

Free Report: Tyk vs. WSO2 API Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Tyk vs. WSO2 API Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Tyk vs. WSO2 API Manager report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.