Visual Studio Test Professional vs Wikidi Testomato comparison

Microsoft and Wikidi are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Microsoft is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3, while Wikidi is ranked #43. Microsoft holds a 1.6% mindshare in FT, compared to Wikidi’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution.

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Read 53 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews

1,835 Views
936 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Wikidi Testomato

171 Views
150 Comparison Views

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Wikidi Testomato

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Visual Studio Test Professional and Wikidi Testomato based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, BrowserStack, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (6th)

Wikidi Testomato

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

43rd

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 1.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wikidi Testomato is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Visual Studio Test Professional	1.6%
Wikidi Testomato	0.4%
Other	98.0%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting

Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Read full review

Use Wikidi Testomato?

Leave a review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Marketing Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Performing Arts

11%

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	24

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional?

We are using Microsoft Visual Studio for automation testing, specifically using C# Selenium.Visual Studio Test Case Management, which is embedded in Azure DevOps itself, is part of our process. We ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 5% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 3% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Wikidi Testomato

Compared 66% of the time

More Wikidi Testomato Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Visual Studio Test Professional

February 2026

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

March 2026

Download Wikidi Testomato product report

Also Known As

No data available

Testomato

Overview

Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.

Microsoft

Wikidi Testomato monitors your website for problems that make your business vulnerable. It has Easy-to-read reports that tracks site performance to identify error patterns and prevent future issues, Instant Alerts that runs website checks every 5 minutes and monitors uptime performance every 15 seconds reducing time-to-resolution and Quick Setup that starts running checks in seconds to verify your website is working.

Wikidi

Sample Customers

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

Jollibee, Wingmen Online Marketing GmbH, Kaymu, Dixi, Toi Toi

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, BrowserStack, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.