

Windward Core and Zendesk serve different business purposes, with Windward Core excelling in document generation and Zendesk leading in customer support solutions. Overall, users tend to prefer Zendesk due to its comprehensive feature set.
Features: Windward Core offers advanced document automation with dynamic template design, integration with Microsoft Office, and seamless XML and SQL data incorporation. In contrast, Zendesk provides an extensive ticketing system, insightful analytics, and AI-driven automation for customer interaction enhancements.
Room for Improvement: Windward Core could enhance its cloud deployment features, broaden its integration capabilities with other platforms, and offer more user training resources. Zendesk could improve by offering more affordable pricing plans, enhancing its mobile app functionality, and simplifying initial setup processes further.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Windward Core boasts an easy deployment with responsive, integration-focused support, whereas Zendesk uses a cloud-based deployment model supported by a vast knowledge base and community, showcasing a more robust support network overall.
Pricing and ROI: Windward Core offers competitive pricing with notable ROI through documentation efficiency. Zendesk, while it involves higher initial costs due to its broad functionalities, justifies this with substantial ROI in customer service enhancement and efficiency, which appeals to those needing extensive support tools.
I can tell you that we probably saved at least three employees full-time with the ticket management and the automation and the macros and the user follow-up being built in.
Time saved is definitely a benefit because it puts all of our tickets in one spot.
I feel that Zendesk helped us set up our platform for providing support way faster than other platforms due to its easy configuration.
There appears to be a lack of connection between the bot and the agents, making it feel scripted rather than helpful.
The technical support provided by Zendesk has been very satisfactory.
Their support team from Zendesk is excellent, similar to what you have in Freshdesk.
We have not hit a peak or a turn yet that Zendesk has not been able to go with us or been able to grow with us in the process, change or pivot that the company is making.
Zendesk can scale from very small companies to very large ones.
Zendesk's scalability is excellent.
They are always informing us with a status update and an ETA, and the turnaround time is usually within the same day with no extended downtime that would cause a detriment to our company.
Zendesk is quite stable; we experience major outages only once or twice a year, making it very reliable.
The stability has been quite reliable.
Zendesk could actually support HTML on the tickets so we could format our text better than the current options such as size, bold, italic, or underscored, because the text processing is too simple.
Zendesk is missing an AI aspect that could help provide quick answers based on the knowledge housed within the platform.
Zendesk is amazing, and because they are always working on a new upgrade or a new integration, they are very forward-thinking from an engineering perspective.
It is not the cheapest solution nor the most expensive, but it provides value for money.
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Zendesk was quite expensive.
It allows us to handle more support cases with fewer people due to its advanced artificial intelligence capabilities.
Zendesk is way cheaper than other ITSM platforms such as ServiceNow, providing a good platform at a lower price so we could offer good support with a low budget for the license.
Being able to put response counters on certain tickets and have certain ones that are high priority and have a tighter SLA than lower priority items, being able to categorize them as a question versus an urgent request, and being able to bucket them as feature requests or product enhancements.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Zendesk | 1.2% |
| Windward Core | 1.2% |
| Other | 97.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 36 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
What is Windward Studios?
For over a decade, Windward has been a leader in the software development industry by creating the most innovative and advanced document automation and reporting software on the planet.
Data-Driven Document Automation
Generate stunning documents that incorporate relevant data easily and seamlessly.
Visually Striking Designs
Our software provides innovative tools and features to build beautiful designs and stunning layouts, all within the familiar Microsoft Office Suite. Your imagination is the only limitation.
Agile Document Logic
We offer the best document automation software for the new millennium. With our conditional logic functionality, you can swiftly personalize the document content to gratify your end users.
Huge Time Saver
Looking for faster template creation that enables you to keep pace with your business? With our software, template creation takes minutes and you do not need any programming experience to get it done.
Exceptionally Intuitive Interface
Our program's design offers documents that can be edited, customized and designed using MS Office. Enjoy a stress-free document automation experience in programs you already know.
Efficient Savings
Significantly reduce the resources and time required for template development by using our streamlined template design and document automation tools.
Zendesk Support is intuitive, and it's built with support agents in mind. Everything they need lives in a single, dynamic help desk interface so it's easy to be productive and manage customer interactions.
We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.