XM Cyber vs Zafran Security comparison

XM Cyber and Zafran Security are both solutions in the Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) category. XM Cyber is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Zafran Security is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.5. XM Cyber holds a 11.6% mindshare in CTEM, compared to Zafran Security’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of XM Cyber users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zafran Security users who would recommend it.

XM Cyber

Read 6 XM Cyber reviews

3,320 Views
1,262 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zafran Security

Read 6 Zafran Security reviews

3,798 Views
1,557 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

XM Cyber

Zafran Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

XM Cyber and Zafran Security are competing in the cybersecurity domain, focusing on vulnerability management and protection. XM Cyber takes the lead in automated continuous security testing, while Zafran Security excels in real-time threat intelligence.

Features: XM Cyber offers automated attack simulations, vulnerability assessment, and risk quantification, enabling businesses to prioritize remediation efficiently. Zafran Security provides real-time threat detection, comprehensive threat intelligence tools, and a mitigation module for impactful risk reduction, which streamline risk management processes.

Room for Improvement: XM Cyber could enhance its real-time threat intelligence to match competitors. Integration with existing security tools can be expanded for greater efficiency. Better handling of non-standard setups could also improve its adoption. Zafran Security might consider simplifying its deployment process for smaller entities. The complexity of its integration procedures could be reduced. Automating certain threat intelligence tasks would further enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: XM Cyber offers a straightforward deployment process and comprehensive support, making it easy to integrate into existing systems. Zafran Security, while offering intricate deployment, provides extensive guidance beneficial for large enterprises with complex infrastructures. XM Cyber scores high on ease of use, whereas Zafran Security stands out for its depth of support in complex scenarios.

Pricing and ROI: XM Cyber presents competitive setup costs and aims for swift ROI by targeting major vulnerabilities. Zafran Security, although potentially more costly initially, offers significant ROI through enhanced detection and intelligence updates. XM Cyber is noted for its immediate cost benefits, whereas Zafran Security's pricing is justified by its advanced security features.

To learn more, read our detailed XM Cyber vs. Zafran Security Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

XM Cyber vs. Zafran Security

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

XM Cyber

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

34th

Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Continuous Controls Monitoring (3rd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (26th)

Zafran Security

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

18th

Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

2nd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) category, the mindshare of XM Cyber is 11.6%, down from 14.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zafran Security is 7.7%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zafran Security	7.7%
XM Cyber	11.6%
Other	80.7%

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

Featured Reviews

Stephen Owen

Group CISO at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

Has significantly improved risk visibility and optimized remediation efforts across dynamic environments

We tightly integrate with APIs, consuming feeds and open source data. We have integrated with XM Cyber, and we are elevating ourselves with AI and MCP tools as we view this as a forerunner to reducing the workload for our agents and IT staff. We're pushing all our security partners to provide AI and MCP tools. Our vision is for them to offer a chat interface where a junior IT or an experienced infrastructure engineer can ask for what needs to be patched next without using an interface. Their current interface is very usable and professional, ranking in the top tier of applications. Their reporting is good, offering custom reports, and their API integration is a new capability that serves us well. We have high expectations for the next generation, such as a chat interface to ask questions. However, everything has been very good. We push the boundaries with digital twins; I understand XM Cyber uses a similar concept of graph databases to map environments. I would like access to that and querying languages, enabling more informed business decisions. XM Cyber sees much of our estate, which is beneficial for making informed decisions, and we can harness those insights and data for business analytics. For instance, it could help us gain insights into change management—if a particular server impacts another and that server is supported by yet another server, we could glean significant insights for change management meetings.

Read full review

Reviewer6233

Information Security Vulnerability Management Executive Advisor at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal

While Zafran Security is already a powerful tool, there are areas where it could be further improved to provide even greater value. One key area for enhancement is the searching capabilities within its vulnerabilities module. By incorporating the ability to create Boolean searches, users would gain the ability to apply more complex filters and customize their search criteria. This would greatly enhance the precision and efficiency with which security teams can identify and prioritize vulnerabilities. Having such tailored search capabilities would save time and resources by narrowing down vast lists of vulnerabilities to those that meet specific parameters relevant to our unique risk environment. Additionally, integrating more robust reporting and visualization tools would be advantageous. Enhanced dashboards that offer customizable visual representations of risk configurations and threat landscapes would facilitate better communication with stakeholders, making it easier to explain vulnerabilities and the rationale behind certain security measures. This would also aid in demonstrating the improvements and value derived from existing security investments to leadership and non-technical team members.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable."

"XM Cyber made it clear that browser vulnerabilities were the top priority because the platform was able to examine how vulnerabilities within our estate could be exploited and what the path would be from some bad actor in order to exploit those vulnerabilities."

"XM Cyber permits us to identify if a zero-day vulnerability can affect our infrastructure; it helps me understand the company's total risk that we have in our infrastructure and workstation vulnerability, and it permits us to identify the real impact when we have a vulnerability."

"Six weeks into using XM Cyber, we saw a compelling return on investment—primarily in risk reduction, with a specific issue our other security tooling did not pick up but XM Cyber did, reducing IT remediation time and saving over 60,000 US dollars per year while significantly lowering our loss exposure amount."

"Since implementing XM Cyber, we have improved the way we are doing patching, focusing on the choke points in our patching cycle, and it improves the way we assess the risk."

"The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"With Zafran Security, it integrates with your security controls, allowing you to take that risk score and reduce it based on the controls in place or increase the risk based on different factors, such as if the issue is internet reachable or if there's an exploit in the wild."

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

Cons

"They could improve support because when we need to create a super case and escalate to resolve with technical support, they resolve our ticket in approximately two weeks."

"We'd like to see a cheaper price."

"We have high expectations for the next generation, such as a chat interface to ask questions."

"We have not saved any time or effort, but we can prove that the effort involved around vulnerability management has been better spent to greater effect, and we've been able to demonstrate that vulnerabilities that do represent a high risk have been remediated more rapidly and more effectively."

"There are many interesting things about XM Cyber, but the part that can be improved is the mobile exposure and the IBM i specific equipment."

"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas."

"They could improve support because when we need to create a super case and escalate to resolve with technical support, they resolve our ticket in approximately two weeks."

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have to pay standard licensing fees."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for XM Cyber?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was that we have a large, complicated estate, and in the licensing discussions, we were keen not to have the cost balloon because of the compli...

See all answers

What needs improvement with XM Cyber?

The roadmap is a disadvantage because this kind of technology should incorporate AI. At the moment, we don't have any modules with AI. They could improve support because when we need to create a su...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for XM Cyber?

My major use case for XM Cyber is managing the services in our company, Prosegur Iberia, for Spain and Portugal. We develop and work together with XM Cyber technicians to develop use cases and anal...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

Since we stood Zafran Security up in our private cloud, we handle the maintenance on our side. As we opted not to use their public offering, we took responsibility for everything within that bounda...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

In terms of areas for improvement, Zafran Security is doing a really great job as a new and emerging company. Oftentimes, new companies try to be everything to everyone or overload the system with ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

My use cases for Zafran Security revolve around two primary areas. One is around vulnerability management and prioritization of vulnerabilities and risks because we're a really large company with a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pentera vs XM Cyber

Compared 10% of the time

Cymulate vs XM Cyber

Compared 10% of the time

Wiz vs XM Cyber

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Security Exposure Management vs XM Cyber

Compared 6% of the time

AttackIQ vs XM Cyber

Compared 5% of the time

More XM Cyber Competitors

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 20% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Zafran Security

Compared 10% of the time

Nucleus Security vs Zafran Security

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs Zafran Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

XM Cyber

February 2026

Download XM Cyber product report

Buyer's Guide

Zafran Security

February 2026

Download Zafran Security product report

Overview

XM Cyber is a leading hybrid cloud security company that’s changing the way innovative organizations approach cyber risk. Our attack path management platform continuously uncovers hidden attack paths to your critical assets across cloud and on-prem environments, so you can cut them off at key junctures and eradicate risk with a fraction of the effort. This overcomes the big disconnect that security teams experience when they’re presented with endless alerts, yet can’t see which exposures impact risk the most, how they come together to be exploited by an attacker, or how to efficiently eliminate them. This approach is a complete game-changer, which is why some of the world’s largest, most complex organizations choose XM Cyber to help eradicate risk. Founded by top executives from the Israeli cyber intelligence community, XM Cyber has offices in North America, Europe, and Israel.

XM Cyber

Zafran Security revolutionizes threat management by leveraging existing tools to distinguish between non-exploitable and critical vulnerabilities, ensuring swift action on potential risks.

Zafran Security offers a groundbreaking approach to vulnerability management through its Zafran Threat Exposure Management Platform. This unified platform utilizes existing security tools to filter out non-exploitable vulnerabilities while prioritizing actionable threats. By integrating vulnerability signals from hybrid cloud environments and factoring in IT-specific contexts, such as CVE presence and asset reachability, Zafran sharpens focus on the most critical exposures. Their solution empowers users to manage risks efficiently, cutting remediation time and restoring risk control to security teams. Recognized as the top CTEM solution by Cyber Defense Magazine in 2024, Zafran provides unmatched capability in threat mitigation and risk reduction.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Mitigations Module: Identifies effective measures, boosting efficiency with minimal disruption.
Exposure Tracker: Delivers insights into vulnerability trends to enhance strategic planning.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with tools to analyze risks accurately and adjust risk levels.
Weekly Insights: Offers regular updates and scoring to assist leadership in risk evaluation.

What benefits should users expect from Zafran Security?

Prominent Adaptability: The private SaaS setup offers flexible and prompt benefits.
Effective Vulnerability Management: Focuses resources on pressing threats, reducing remediation time.
Streamlined Communication: Customizable dashboards improve reporting and communication.

Zafran Security finds utility in multiple industries needing robust risk management. It enhances vulnerability scoring and prioritization, supporting the assessment and management of exposure. This is particularly valuable in sectors with significant cyber risks, emphasizing identification and swift response to immediate threats, thus reinforcing cybersecurity infrastructures.

Zafran Security

Sample Customers

Hamburg Port Authority, Plymouth Rock Corporation

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

XM Cyber vs. Zafran Security

March 2026

Free Report: XM Cyber vs. Zafran Security

Find out what your peers are saying about XM Cyber vs. Zafran Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our XM Cyber vs. Zafran Security report.

See our list of best Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) vendors and best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.