Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Debian Logo

Top 10 Debian Alternatives

Vendor: Debian
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Debian Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Debian based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Rocky Linux, Ubuntu Linux, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Debian surpasses its competitors by offering robust stability, security, and a vast software repository, making it the preferred choice for developers and users seeking a reliable and versatile operating system with extensive community support and continuous software updates.

Debian Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Debian, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Debian Logo
Rocky Linux
4.3 out of 5
Debian Logo
Rocky Linux
4.3 out of 5
Rocky Linux targets enterprise compatibility, offering stability for CentOS users with security and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Debian's extensive package repository, flexibility, and strong community support make it adaptable, enhancing deployment ease and long-term ROI for diverse environments.
Download Debian vs. Rocky Linux Report
Rocky Linux setup costs are significantly lower than Debian, offering a budget-friendly installation option; Debian, however, provides a more stable long-term investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Rocky Linux setup costs are significantly lower than Debian, offering a budget-friendly installation option; Debian, however, provides a more stable long-term investment.
Debian Logo
Ubuntu Linux
4.3 out of 5
Debian Logo
Ubuntu Linux
4.3 out of 5
Ubuntu Linux offers user-friendly features and robust support, appealing to businesses and beginners. In comparison, Debian provides extensive customization and stability, attracting skilled developers and enterprises needing reliable systems. Ubuntu is ideal for easy setups, while Debian suits those valuing deep system control.
Download Debian vs. Ubuntu Linux Report
Ubuntu Linux setup costs are slightly higher than Debian, reflecting its focus on user-friendly features and support options. Debian, known for its minimalistic approach, offers lower setup costs appealing to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Ubuntu Linux setup costs are slightly higher than Debian, reflecting its focus on user-friendly features and support options. Debian, known for its minimalistic approach, offers lower setup costs appealing to budget-conscious users.
Debian Logo
Debian Logo
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
4.4 out of 5
Red Hat Enterprise Linux emphasizes enterprise support and stability, ideal for critical compliance needs. In comparison, Debian's open-source adaptability and cost-effectiveness appeal to those seeking flexibility and community-driven solutions. Both offer distinct advantages based on enterprise requirements and budget considerations.
Download Debian vs. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Report
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) generally involves higher setup costs compared to Debian, reflecting its enterprise-grade support and features, whereas Debian offers a more budget-friendly alternative for users prioritizing cost over premium services.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) generally involves higher setup costs compared to Debian, reflecting its enterprise-grade support and features, whereas Debian offers a more budget-friendly alternative for users prioritizing cost over premium services.
Debian Logo
Windows Server
4.1 out of 5
Debian Logo
Windows Server
4.1 out of 5
Windows Server offers strong Microsoft integration and Active Directory services, appealing to enterprises favoring vendor-backed solutions. In comparison, Debian's open-source flexibility and cost-effectiveness attract those seeking control and customization without high licensing fees.
Download Debian vs. Windows Server Report
Windows Server has a higher setup cost compared to Debian, which offers a more economical solution with lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Windows Server has a higher setup cost compared to Debian, which offers a more economical solution with lower initial expenses.
Debian Logo
Oracle Linux
4.2 out of 5
Debian Logo
Oracle Linux
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Linux provides enhanced security and integration with Oracle software, advantageous for enterprises needing robust support. In comparison, Debian offers flexibility with a wide software repository, appealing to organizations seeking cost efficiency and customization through community-driven resources.
Download Debian vs. Oracle Linux Report
Oracle Linux requires higher initial setup costs compared to Debian, making it a less budget-friendly option for deployment. Debian offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to users seeking economical solutions without compromising on capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Linux requires higher initial setup costs compared to Debian, making it a less budget-friendly option for deployment. Debian offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to users seeking economical solutions without compromising on capabilities.
Debian Logo
Debian Logo
SUSE Linux Enterprise
4.3 out of 5
SUSE Linux Enterprise offers enterprise-grade features with strong support, ideal for businesses needing structured deployment and commercial features. In comparison, Debian's cost-effectiveness and flexibility appeal to those who prioritize extensive capabilities and adaptability over corporate support and structured processes.
Download Debian vs. SUSE Linux Enterprise Report
SUSE Linux Enterprise typically involves an initial setup cost while Debian often does not incur setup charges, highlighting a cost advantage for Debian.
View comparison
Pricing
SUSE Linux Enterprise typically involves an initial setup cost while Debian often does not incur setup charges, highlighting a cost advantage for Debian.
Debian Logo
Windows 11
4.3 out of 5
Debian Logo
Windows 11
4.3 out of 5
Windows 11 is ideal for those prioritizing seamlessness and commercial support. In comparison, Debian appeals to users seeking customization and open-source benefits. Windows 11's polished experience contrasts with Debian’s flexibility, suiting different deployment needs and technical expertise levels.
Download Debian vs. Windows 11 Report
Windows 11 requires a one-time setup cost, whereas Debian offers a free setup, highlighting a significant initial cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Windows 11 requires a one-time setup cost, whereas Debian offers a free setup, highlighting a significant initial cost difference.
Debian Logo
openSUSE Leap
4.6 out of 5
Debian Logo
openSUSE Leap
4.6 out of 5
openSUSE Leap offers enterprise-oriented features and professional-level support, appealing to businesses needing comprehensive solutions. In comparison, Debian's robust stability and extensive package repository cater to those prioritizing open-source freedom and long-term reliability, making it ideal for tech-savvy users seeking dependable performance.
Download Debian vs. openSUSE Leap Report
openSUSE Leap offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Debian requires more initial investment. Their setup cost differences reflect their distinct target users.
View comparison
Pricing
openSUSE Leap offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Debian requires more initial investment. Their setup cost differences reflect their distinct target users.
Debian Logo
CentOS
4.2 out of 5
Debian Logo
CentOS
4.2 out of 5
CentOS excels in enterprise environments due to its stability and robust support. In comparison, Debian appeals to those seeking adaptability with its large package repository and community support. CentOS ensures straightforward deployment, while Debian's cost-effectiveness and flexibility attract developers.
Download CentOS vs. Debian Report
CentOS offers a lower setup cost compared to Debian, making it more attractive for budget-conscious users, while Debian provides additional features justifying its higher setup price.
View comparison
Pricing
CentOS offers a lower setup cost compared to Debian, making it more attractive for budget-conscious users, while Debian provides additional features justifying its higher setup price.
Debian Logo
Fedora Linux
4.5 out of 5
Debian Logo
Fedora Linux
4.5 out of 5
Fedora Linux attracts with innovative features and quick deployment, ideal for fast implementation. In comparison, Debian's stability and vast software repository appeal to enterprises needing robust reliability. Fedora's streamlined process contrasts with Debian's requirement for technical expertise, catering to experienced administrators.
Fedora Linux offers a straightforward setup with minimal cost, while Debian is known for its complex setup process, often requiring more manual configuration effort.
View comparison
Pricing
Fedora Linux offers a straightforward setup with minimal cost, while Debian is known for its complex setup process, often requiring more manual configuration effort.
Debian Logo
Windows 10
4.1 out of 5
Debian Logo
Windows 10
4.1 out of 5
Windows 10 offers superior customer support appealing to commercial buyers with its integration and ease of use. In comparison, Debian provides flexibility and robust features, favoring technical users interested in cost efficiency, control, and extensive community support for server environments.
Download Debian vs. Windows 10 Report
Windows 10 has a higher setup cost compared to Debian, which offers a free installation option.
View comparison
Pricing
Windows 10 has a higher setup cost compared to Debian, which offers a free installation option.
Debian Logo
Kali Linux
4.3 out of 5
Debian Logo
Kali Linux
4.3 out of 5
Kali Linux targets cybersecurity professionals with pre-installed security tools. In comparison, Debian provides a stable platform and extensive repositories, appealing to organizations needing development and production environments. Kali Linux offers niche specialization, while Debian supports diverse applications with robust community support.
Download Debian vs. Kali Linux Report
Kali Linux has a higher setup cost compared to Debian, offering advanced penetration testing tools, whereas Debian, with its lower setup costs, provides a stable and general-purpose platform ideal for servers and desktops.
View comparison
Pricing
Kali Linux has a higher setup cost compared to Debian, offering advanced penetration testing tools, whereas Debian, with its lower setup costs, provides a stable and general-purpose platform ideal for servers and desktops.
Debian Logo
Alpine Linux
1 out of 5
Debian Logo
Alpine Linux
1 out of 5
Alpine Linux offers lightweight design and security, ideal for containers. In comparison, Debian provides a vast repository and strong compatibility, supporting diverse applications. Alpine appeals for minimal overhead, while Debian supports complex setups. Alpine is cost-effective, whereas Debian provides long-term value.
Alpine Linux generally incurs lower setup costs compared to Debian due to its streamlined nature, while Debian offers a more comprehensive setup that might involve higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Alpine Linux generally incurs lower setup costs compared to Debian due to its streamlined nature, while Debian offers a more comprehensive setup that might involve higher initial expenses.
Debian Logo
AlmaLinux
4.4 out of 5
Debian Logo
AlmaLinux
4.4 out of 5
Debian offers stability and extensive package management, appealing to users seeking versatility and community support. In comparison, AlmaLinux provides enterprise-level features and compatibility with Red Hat environments, attracting businesses interested in a smooth transition from CentOS with structured support and professional documentation.
Debian's setup cost is minimal, allowing for a cost-effective start, while AlmaLinux may require a higher initial investment. Key differences in pricing emphasize Debian's affordability over AlmaLinux's pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Debian's setup cost is minimal, allowing for a cost-effective start, while AlmaLinux may require a higher initial investment. Key differences in pricing emphasize Debian's affordability over AlmaLinux's pricing structure.
Debian Logo
Debian Logo
Google ChromeOS Flex
1 out of 5
Google ChromeOS Flex integrates smoothly with Google services, emphasizing affordability and ease, appealing to education and low-maintenance settings. In comparison, Debian offers extensive open-source customization, rewarding technical investment with flexibility, making it ideal for advanced users needing tailored systems and long-term adaptability.
Google ChromeOS Flex offers a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Debian provides a more versatile setup, suited for custom configurations with potential higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Google ChromeOS Flex offers a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Debian provides a more versatile setup, suited for custom configurations with potential higher expenses.
Debian Logo
Debian Logo
Flatcar Container Linux
4.0 out of 5
Flatcar Container Linux offers minimal setup costs and automated deployment, appealing to containerized environments. In comparison, Debian provides extensive customizability and strong community support, fitting versatile infrastructures. Tech buyers choose Flatcar for simplicity and speed, while Debian attracts those needing flexibility and extensive features.
Flatcar Container Linux offers a zero setup cost, while Debian involves an initial setup expense, highlighting its traditional setup model.
View comparison
Pricing
Flatcar Container Linux offers a zero setup cost, while Debian involves an initial setup expense, highlighting its traditional setup model.
Debian Logo
Amazon Linux
4.2 out of 5
Debian Logo
Amazon Linux
4.2 out of 5
Amazon Linux offers seamless AWS integration and cloud-optimized operations. In comparison, Debian provides extensive application support and long-term stability. Tech buyers might select Amazon Linux for AWS environments, while Debian suits those needing adaptable, free solutions with community backing.
Download Amazon Linux vs. Debian Report
Amazon Linux offers a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly option, while Debian's higher setup cost might suit more feature-demanding environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon Linux offers a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly option, while Debian's higher setup cost might suit more feature-demanding environments.
Debian Logo
Debian Logo
Amazon Linux AMI
1 out of 5
Amazon Linux AMI integrates smoothly with AWS services, optimizing cloud deployment. In comparison, Debian stands out for robust security and extensive software packages. Amazon Linux AMI attracts AWS-centric businesses, while Debian appeals to those needing stability and customization.
Amazon Linux AMI has a minimal setup cost, providing a cost-effective option for businesses, whereas Debian presents a similarly affordable setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon Linux AMI has a minimal setup cost, providing a cost-effective option for businesses, whereas Debian presents a similarly affordable setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users.

Related categories

Operating Systems (OS) for Business
OpenStack