

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and Debian compete in the field of operating systems, each offering unique benefits. RHEL holds a slight advantage due to its comprehensive support, enterprise-ready features, and strong vendor support, making it ideal for large enterprises requiring robust assistance and security.
Features: RHEL offers reliable security features, extensive management tools, and enterprise-grade support. It's known for its reliable patch management and built-in security measures such as SELinux and Ansible automation. Debian excels in customizability and flexibility with a vast repository of packages, seamless updates, and strong community support, providing an ideal environment for those seeking cost-effective solutions.
Room for Improvement: RHEL could improve in reducing setup complexities and increasing documentation accessibility for less technical users. It may also benefit from enhanced user interface features for Linux beginners. Debian could work on enhancing its professional support services, offering more intuitive tools for system management, and providing faster responses to security vulnerabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RHEL's deployment is streamlined with robust customer service, offering dedicated training and support programs. Its comprehensive documentation aids in quick deployment. Debian focuses on community-driven support that is extensive but may require more technical skills. Its deployment is more suited for those familiar with Linux systems and community forums.
Pricing and ROI: RHEL involves higher initial setup costs with ongoing subscription fees, providing a strong ROI for enterprises prioritizing reliability and support. Debian, being free, incurs minimal to no setup costs, offering high ROI for those prioritizing cost savings and open-source flexibility. RHEL suits organizations investing in enterprise support, while Debian benefits those looking for cost-effective solutions.
There were direct cost savings since Debian has no licensing fees, and we did not require paid support, so it saved us considerable money.
We were able to save a substantial amount by using Linux instead of Windows and spending a lot of money on Windows licenses.
I have seen a return on investment; specifically, the cost is around zero because there is no need for a license, and since my whole team uses Debian, we are fine with the number of employees needed.
A long lifecycle is key to having a good return on investment.
Being able to transform common manual tasks that previously took all day into processes that take an hour, half an hour, or even less, demonstrates clear value.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux has saved us time and increased productivity.
We rely on community resources for support, such as documentation, forums, and asking questions online.
Whenever I had a query, I used Google to search for it and found very helpful information from public platforms.
While it does not have traditional paid customer support like some commercial distributions, the Debian community and documentation are very strong.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) support is great, as they go beyond their duty to help resolve issues and provide solutions even for third-party software such as XRDP.
When we do contact customer service, they are generally very knowledgeable and well-versed in our size.
Usually, I send the information, and they have something for me within hours, sometimes even minutes.
We don't spin up new Debian instances arbitrarily.
As the growth of our infrastructure is required, we can host many Debian servers.
We decided to use Debian because we needed a more stable and predictable base, especially for long-running systems where frequent changes or upgrades could cause issues.
Many of our applications scale really well, with some having several hundreds of VMs, which we couldn't accomplish on Windows.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) scales very well with the growing needs of our company.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) handles increases in users, applications, or data smoothly, which is why we use it for all our projects, as it provides us with confidence.
I rate Debian an eight out of ten because it excels in stability, reliability, and package management, which are very important for long-running production systems.
That long-term support has helped me and my customers by being stable and running well.
In my experience, Debian is very stable.
It works consistently with minimal downtime and very few bugs or glitches.
It just works, and that's really the key factor; I can't remember the last time we had a system go down and had to restore it due to a bad patch.
We've not had a service outage with Red Hat in six years.
I believe security on Debian is top-notch due to its long history and the many individuals and organizations that rely on it, meaning there are many eyes on it.
If Debian had a memory-based distribution, similar to Alpine, that would be great, as we could get benefits in terms of memory or embedded systems.
Debian was easy to set up.
Addressing these limitations would significantly enhance the operating system's flexibility and efficiency.
The built-in security features of Red Hat Enterprise Linux were insufficient for our needs, necessitating the implementation of supplementary security measures.
By providing pre-installed, native automation tools within the operating system, Red Hat would streamline processes and improve user efficiency.
My experience with Debian's pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that it is all free.
As long as I remain within the limit of that credit, I can create machines as much as I want without exceeding the monthly limit.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is quite favorable; since Debian is totally free, it is one of my first options.
It may be considered expensive compared to other solutions like CentOS or Ubuntu, which offer some of the same features without additional costs.
Its pricing has room for improvement because it's more expensive in the local market due to purchasing power parity in India.
Windows Servers base their cost on the number of users and have high licensing fees, while Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers free versions alongside its paid, supported versions.
Debian's stability helps me in my daily work because my work relies on stability; I'm trying to deploy production workloads, and Debian offers that stability for me.
Debian has kept my workflow secure by maintaining system stability with day-to-day or monthly updates with security patches, securing the system from external attacks.
Debian has positively impacted my organization primarily in cost-efficiency, with on-premises hardware running faster and cheaper.
It also has strong security features, is OIS and FIPS certified, and has built-in Linux security configurations.
There is also no downtime.
The operating system allows for the simple addition of kernels, modules, and other applications, making it highly adaptable to various needs.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) | 7.6% |
| Debian | 5.5% |
| Other | 86.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 87 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 49 |
| Large Enterprise | 266 |
Debian is a reliable open-source operating system ideal for servers and desktops. With its wide array of packages and stable releases, it suits developers and organizations seeking dependable performance and security.
Debian stands out for its stability and extensive package repository, making it a go-to choice for developers. Its open-source nature ensures transparency and flexibility. Debian's package management system, APT, simplifies software installation and updates. Its security updates are regular and prompt, ensuring systems are protected. With support for multiple architectures, Debian caters to various environments from desktops to large-scale servers.
What are the key features of Debian?Debian is widely used in industries such as web hosting, scientific research, and education, where reliability and long-term support are priorities. Its flexibility allows it to be adapted for specialized applications in scientific computing or educational environments, ensuring it meets industry-specific technical requirements.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers stability, security, and support for mission-critical applications with robust tools and scalable architecture, ideal for diverse environments and hybrid cloud compatibility.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux provides organizations with a reliable platform ideal for high-performance computing and virtualization. Known for its robust security and seamless network administration, it integrates well with OpenShift and Ansible, ensuring adaptability and scalability. Despite challenges with documentation, upgrade complexity, and cost, RHEL remains a formidable choice thanks to its comprehensive documentation and extensive community support.
What are the key features of Red Hat Enterprise Linux?
What benefits should users look for when evaluating Red Hat Enterprise Linux?
Organizations across industries like financial services, telecommunications, and application hosting implement Red Hat Enterprise Linux for server and application management. Its compatibility with technologies such as SAP, Oracle, and Ansible supports functions including web, database, and enterprise solutions, ensuring stable and secure performance in high-pressure environments.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.