Top 10 Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Alternatives

Name: Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Brand: Red Hat
Rating: 4.4 (388 reviews)

Vendor: Red Hat

4.4 out of 5

388 reviews
97% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Rocky Linux, Ubuntu Linux, and Windows Server. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) surpasses its competitors by offering exceptional security features, robust performance, and reliable support, making it a top choice for enterprises seeking a stable and scalable operating system to power their critical applications.

Red Hat Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Red Hat, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Rocky Linux

4.3 out of 5

Rocky Linux

4.3 out of 5

RHEL offers stability, comprehensive security, and a robust ecosystem support, ideal for enterprises prioritizing these features despite a higher cost. In comparison, Rocky Linux provides RHEL's functionality without licensing fees, appealing to organizations valuing budget-friendly options and community support.

Download Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Rocky Linux Report

Pricing

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) setup costs are higher due to its premium support offerings, while Rocky Linux provides a more budget-friendly option with no setup fees, appealing to users seeking cost-effective solutions without compromising on essential functionalities.

View comparison

Pricing

Ubuntu Linux

4.3 out of 5

Ubuntu Linux

4.3 out of 5

Ubuntu Linux offers open-source flexibility ideal for customizable environments while being cost-effective. In comparison, RHEL provides enterprise-level support and robust security, justifying its subscription cost. Ubuntu suits budget-conscious users, whereas RHEL appeals to those needing extensive support and stability.

Download Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Ubuntu Linux Report

Pricing

Ubuntu Linux offers low setup costs appealing to budget-conscious users, while Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) typically commands higher initial expenses reflecting its extensive enterprise features.

View comparison

Pricing

Ubuntu Linux offers low setup costs appealing to budget-conscious users, while Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) typically commands higher initial expenses reflecting its extensive enterprise features.

Windows Server

4.1 out of 5

Windows Server

4.1 out of 5

Red Hat Enterprise Linux appeals to tech-savvy organizations with its stability and security features offering cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Windows Server delivers integrated solutions and seamless compatibility with Microsoft applications, making it ideal for enterprises focused on long-term Microsoft ecosystem benefits.

Download Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Windows Server Report

Pricing

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) has a lower setup cost, making it economically advantageous, whereas Windows Server often involves higher initial costs due to licensing fees. This distinction in cost highlights RHEL's affordability compared to Windows Server's higher pricing.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Linux

4.2 out of 5

Oracle Linux

4.2 out of 5

RHEL excels in security and certified applications while providing strong performance, ideal for businesses prioritizing stability. In comparison, Oracle Linux offers superior virtualization and cloud integration, appealing to companies seeking flexibility and cost savings, especially in Oracle-driven environments.

Download Oracle Linux vs. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Report

Pricing

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) has a higher setup cost compared to Oracle Linux, which offers a more budget-friendly option. The differences in setup costs highlight Red Hat’s extensive support and certified hardware compatibility versus Oracle’s competitive entry-level pricing.

View comparison

Pricing

SUSE Linux Enterprise

4.3 out of 5

SUSE Linux Enterprise

4.3 out of 5

Red Hat Enterprise Linux leads in support and integration for extensive vendor-backed solutions. In comparison, SUSE Linux Enterprise excels in flexible deployment and ease of use, appealing to those needing customizable setups with competitive pricing and adaptable options.

Download Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. SUSE Linux Enterprise Report

Pricing

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) has a straightforward initial setup with predictable costs, whereas SUSE Linux Enterprise incurs higher initial setup expenses, highlighting cost differences between the two solutions. Consider these differences when evaluating options.

View comparison

Pricing

Windows 11

4.3 out of 5

Windows 11

4.3 out of 5

RHEL offers robust security and open-source compatibility, appealing to enterprises prioritizing customization and stability. In comparison, Windows 11 integrates seamlessly with Microsoft's office ecosystem, attracting users seeking enhanced desktop functionalities and productivity. Both provide distinct advantages based on specific business needs.

Download Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Windows 11 Report

Pricing

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) typically incurs a lower setup cost compared to Windows 11, which may result in higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) typically incurs a lower setup cost compared to Windows 11, which may result in higher initial expenses.

openSUSE Leap

4.6 out of 5

openSUSE Leap

4.6 out of 5

RHEL excels in enterprise support and stability, appealing to businesses needing structured customer service and comprehensive security features. In comparison, openSUSE Leap attracts cost-conscious users with its flexibility and community-driven support, offering robust customization and package management options.

Download Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. openSUSE Leap Report

Pricing

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) incurs a setup cost, while openSUSE Leap offers a no-cost setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) incurs a setup cost, while openSUSE Leap offers a no-cost setup.

CentOS

4.2 out of 5

CentOS

4.2 out of 5

RHEL offers premium support and advanced security, ideal for enterprises needing extensive assistance. In comparison, CentOS appeals to budget-conscious users prioritizing cost-effective solutions, providing a similar codebase for compatibility and stability without the expense of dedicated support.

Download CentOS vs. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Report

Pricing

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) involves a significant setup cost due to its comprehensive support and robust features, whereas CentOS offers a minimal setup cost, making it a cost-effective alternative with fewer integrated support services.

View comparison

Pricing

Fedora Linux

4.5 out of 5

Fedora Linux

4.5 out of 5

RHEL delivers robust security and long-term support favored by enterprise environments. In comparison, Fedora provides the latest software and innovation, appealing to tech enthusiasts. RHEL's structured deployment benefits businesses, while Fedora offers flexibility for those with technical expertise.

Pricing

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) involves setup costs typically associated with premium enterprise support, while Fedora Linux offers a no-cost setup due to its community-driven model, highlighting a significant cost difference for users with varying resource availability.

View comparison

Pricing

Windows 10

4.1 out of 5

Windows 10

4.1 out of 5

RHEL targets businesses needing advanced security and customization. In comparison, Windows 10 highlights broad software compatibility and intuitive use. RHEL suits environments focused on stability, while Windows 10 benefits enterprises prioritizing a user-friendly setup and familiar integrations.

Download Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Windows 10 Report

Pricing

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) typically involves higher initial setup costs making it preferable for enterprises needing extensive support, while Windows 10 usually offers a more budget-friendly setup appealing to individual users or smaller businesses.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 9 more products

Related categories

Operating Systems (OS) for Business

OpenStack