Feb 03, 2020
Oracle Linux with little effort (adjustments) can enhance the Oracle DB Performance. And most of the Oracle Products are tested under it.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Oracle Linux are competing products in the enterprise-grade operating system sector. RHEL holds the upper hand with superior support and ecosystem integration, making it ideal for larger corporate environments.
Features:RHEL's valuable features include comprehensive support services, a robust security profile, and a range of certified applications and hardware compatibility. Oracle Linux's standout features are Ksplice for live kernel patching, enhancements for Oracle Database workloads, and seamless integration within Oracle's technology stack.
Room for Improvement:RHEL could benefit from reduced costs on its subscription model and minimizing the need for reboots after updates. Oracle Linux might improve by broadening its application support outside the Oracle ecosystem and enhancing customer service for non-Oracle environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:RHEL offers streamlined deployment with extensive documentation simplifying setup processes and well-regarded responsive customer service. Oracle Linux also provides efficient deployment, especially in Oracle environments, though customer service tends to focus more on Oracle-specific issues.
Pricing and ROI:RHEL's subscription model may entail higher initial costs, which can be justified by stability and high ROI in enterprise infrastructures. Oracle Linux offers a lower entry cost, particularly benefiting existing Oracle customers, providing maximum ROI when integrated with Oracle software solutions.
Our team is comfortable using Oracle Linux as it integrates well with Oracle tools, making everything work seamlessly.
In terms of outcomes or benefits I've seen over the last year, we have more than 30 servers, and we only need to reboot one server while all other servers continue working fine, resulting in very low downtime, which is very helpful.
We had in AWS around 415 per user, so that would be around 400 INR per user in AWS, and post using Oracle, we have reduced it to around 300 INR.
A long lifecycle is key to having a good return on investment.
Being able to transform common manual tasks that previously took all day into processes that take an hour, half an hour, or even less, demonstrates clear value.
I invest effort and money in RHEL 8, expecting the system to be secure and reliable when serving my clients.
The support engineers were knowledgeable and provided detailed guidance rather than generic troubleshooting steps, which is particularly valuable for production or database-heavy environments.
The customer support for Oracle Linux, coming from an AWS perspective, is absolute garbage.
Oracle Linux customer support is solid and enterprise-grade.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) support is great, as they go beyond their duty to help resolve issues and provide solutions even for third-party software such as XRDP.
When we do contact customer service, they are generally very knowledgeable and well-versed in our size.
Usually, I send the information, and they have something for me within hours, sometimes even minutes.
We run a thousand-node cluster with around 8,000 to 9,000 pods running in a cluster, and we have 10 to 15 clusters that we are already running.
It supports large, high-impact systems, scales cleanly across large server fleets and Kubernetes clusters.
Scalability is one of its stronger points, particularly in environments that need to grow from a few servers to large fleets of workloads.
Many of our applications scale really well, with some having several hundreds of VMs, which we couldn't accomplish on Windows.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) scales very well with the growing needs of our company.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) handles increases in users, applications, or data smoothly, which is why we use it for all our projects, as it provides us with confidence.
Avoids reboot-related instability through live kernel patching
Our environment is locally deployed, and there are no performance issues or latency problems.
We are using it in a production environment.
It works consistently with minimal downtime and very few bugs or glitches.
It just works, and that's really the key factor; I can't remember the last time we had a system go down and had to restore it due to a bad patch.
We've not had a service outage with Red Hat in six years.
There are significant limitations as we are not able to customize the system, and we are forced to use standard features which are not suitable for our business.
Oracle Linux has solid official documentation and enterprise backing, which is invaluable.
Onboarding itself could be smoother with more guided and opinionated setup paths, such as clearer best-practice reference architectures for common workloads like databases.
Addressing these limitations would significantly enhance the operating system's flexibility and efficiency.
The built-in security features of Red Hat Enterprise Linux were insufficient for our needs, necessitating the implementation of supplementary security measures.
By providing pre-installed, native automation tools within the operating system, Red Hat would streamline processes and improve user efficiency.
While ERP might be expensive, Oracle Linux and KVMs are not on the higher side.
Oracle is way too cheap compared to them.
Regarding pricing, it is cheaper than Windows.
It may be considered expensive compared to other solutions like CentOS or Ubuntu, which offer some of the same features without additional costs.
Windows Servers base their cost on the number of users and have high licensing fees, while Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers free versions alongside its paid, supported versions.
Compared to cloud-based platforms like AWS or Azure, which offer flexible pay-as-you-go options, RHEL's subscription-based model can become cost-prohibitive for those with limited budgets or smaller-scale projects.
Since it's from the same vendor as Oracle applications, it's easier to manage issues, making not just the solution cost-effective but also streamlined in management.
The updates are applied instantly once a CVE is identified, which makes it highly beneficial.
Oracle Linux provides fast updates, and the best aspect is that we can update our server without interrupting our service, which is very important for business continuity.
It also has strong security features, is OIS and FIPS certified, and has built-in Linux security configurations.
There is also no downtime.
The operating system allows for the simple addition of kernels, modules, and other applications, making it highly adaptable to various needs.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) | 6.7% |
| Oracle Linux | 5.8% |
| Other | 87.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 49 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 81 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 100 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 52 |
| Large Enterprise | 320 |
Oracle Linux offers scalability, security, and enterprise-grade reliability for efficient IT management. Known for its cost-effectiveness, it integrates smoothly with cloud infrastructures and Red Hat systems, supporting stable, high-performance environments.
Oracle Linux stands out with features like seamless kernel updates via Ksplice, enhancing stability without downtime. Its strong compatibility with cloud infrastructures and Docker orchestration facilities makes it a preferred choice. It is integrated with enterprise-level security through SELinux and maintains compliance through reliable support. Its cost-effectiveness paired with resource management efficiency positions it as a vital solution for backend infrastructure hosting, RDBMS workloads, and virtualized environments. Banks, security firms, and server management entities often rely on it for core banking systems, big packet inspection, and AI projects.
What key features do users value?Oracle Linux is integral in industries like finance and cybersecurity, where backend infrastructure hosting, server management, and security are paramount. Organizations deploying core banking systems, application servers, and enterprise applications find its stability, performance, and cost-efficiency crucial for operating under stringent compliance requirements. Its role in AI projects and clustering systems is also significant, demonstrating its adaptability to emerging technology needs while ensuring robust support for critical operations. Improvements in documentation, community support, AI/ML support, and pricing would enhance its market competitiveness.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is known for its strong security, stability, automation, and support, making it a choice for entities aiming to improve operational efficiency and integration with cloud services.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers robust tools like Ansible for automation and SELinux for security, with efficient package management using YUM and DNF. It is preferred for critical applications, databases, cloud infrastructure, and virtualization due to its minimized downtime and performance enhancements. Despite its advantages, improvements are needed in pricing, documentation, and the complexity of licensing. Challenges in integrating third-party tools, Kubernetes, and cloud environments are present. Enhancement in live patching, backward compatibility, virtualization, monitoring, and storage is also necessary.
What are RHEL's key features?Red Hat Enterprise Linux is implemented across sectors like telecommunications, finance, health care, and education, often supporting critical environments with rigorous security and management needs. Its compatibility with automation and management tools like OpenShift allows for efficient handling of enterprise demands.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
