

Red Hat Enterprise Linux and CentOS both serve the enterprise Linux space. RHEL appears to have the upper hand for businesses needing reliable vendor support and a subscription model offering comprehensive service, while CentOS is favored by those prioritizing cost-efficiency and flexibility.
Features: RHEL provides a comprehensive support framework with tools like Satellite for easy deployment and management, advanced security measures with consistent updates, and a robust package manager that allows for easy software handling. CentOS, on the other hand, offers an open-source platform with stability and minimal resource usage, cost-free access to the features of RHEL, and similar package management capabilities without the need for a subscription.
Room for Improvement: RHEL could work on enhancing in-place upgrade paths to further simplify migrations and reduce downtime. Users also noted the complexity involved in security features such as SELinux, indicating potential for more intuitive management tools. CentOS, while generally stable, lacks the direct vendor support and timely updates available to RHEL users, which might be improved with additional community support mechanisms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RHEL provides structured deployment options backed by extensive documentation and vendor-supported customer service, making it ideal for enterprises needing reliable integration with their existing systems. CentOS benefits from a vast community but relies heavily on internal expertise for deployment and support, indicating a steeper learning curve for less experienced users.
Pricing and ROI: RHEL operates on a subscription model that includes access to exclusive support and updates, which can lead to a higher ROI for organizations that value vendor-backed stability as part of their business-critical applications. CentOS offers zero-cost access, making it an attractive option for businesses looking to minimize initial expenses, especially those with the internal technical capabilities to manage and support their systems independently.
The money saved was significant, approximately fifteen percent of our IT budget.
I have seen a return on investment, particularly in terms of money saved because I do not pay for the servers.
I have seen a return on investment using CentOS. I can share that mainly time is saved because of the interfaces I have used.
A long lifecycle is key to having a good return on investment.
Being able to transform common manual tasks that previously took all day into processes that take an hour, half an hour, or even less, demonstrates clear value.
I invest effort and money in RHEL 8, expecting the system to be secure and reliable when serving my clients.
I would rate the customer support for CentOS a 10 on a scale of 1 to 10.
I've seen many people across the globe interacting, and when users encounter issues, the community provides solutions.
I would rate the documentation about eight in terms of usefulness.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) support is great, as they go beyond their duty to help resolve issues and provide solutions even for third-party software such as XRDP.
When we do contact customer service, they are generally very knowledgeable and well-versed in our size.
Usually, I send the information, and they have something for me within hours, sometimes even minutes.
It allows users to scale resources vertically for upgrading hardware and horizontally by adding more servers, making it suitable for modern web hosting and containerized applications.
CentOS is scalable and user-friendly without requiring complex configurations.
CentOS's scalability for my organization has handled growth and changing needs smoothly.
Many of our applications scale really well, with some having several hundreds of VMs, which we couldn't accomplish on Windows.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) scales very well with the growing needs of our company.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) handles increases in users, applications, or data smoothly, which is why we use it for all our projects, as it provides us with confidence.
CentOS is stable, reliable, flexible, and very useful.
CentOS's simplicity and stability make it easy to use.
I believe CentOS is stable, but we are gradually moving away from it.
It works consistently with minimal downtime and very few bugs or glitches.
It just works, and that's really the key factor; I can't remember the last time we had a system go down and had to restore it due to a bad patch.
We've not had a service outage with Red Hat in six years.
The documentation and support could be improved, along with compatibility with newer hardware as hardware continually evolves over time.
Kernel parameters, sysctl config details, tuned profiles, process prioritization, optimized disk, and input scheduler choice are all points for performance optimization.
FreeRADIUS security improvements and security patches are needed.
Addressing these limitations would significantly enhance the operating system's flexibility and efficiency.
The built-in security features of Red Hat Enterprise Linux were insufficient for our needs, necessitating the implementation of supplementary security measures.
By providing pre-installed, native automation tools within the operating system, Red Hat would streamline processes and improve user efficiency.
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing for CentOS, there is no cost for licensing or setup pricing.
There was no cost in terms of deploying it or getting the license for it.
CentOS is a free product with free updates.
It may be considered expensive compared to other solutions like CentOS or Ubuntu, which offer some of the same features without additional costs.
Windows Servers base their cost on the number of users and have high licensing fees, while Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers free versions alongside its paid, supported versions.
Compared to cloud-based platforms like AWS or Azure, which offer flexible pay-as-you-go options, RHEL's subscription-based model can become cost-prohibitive for those with limited budgets or smaller-scale projects.
CentOS has helped me most through its enterprise-level stability.
I have found CentOS servers to run very long without any issues, as well as clean updates that do not cause any downtimes.
The best features CentOS offers in my experience are that it is reliable, cost-effective, and easy to scale.
It also has strong security features, is OIS and FIPS certified, and has built-in Linux security configurations.
There is also no downtime.
The operating system allows for the simple addition of kernels, modules, and other applications, making it highly adaptable to various needs.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) | 6.7% |
| CentOS | 4.7% |
| Other | 88.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 31 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 100 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 52 |
| Large Enterprise | 320 |
CentOS is a robust enterprise-grade operating system known for its stability and broad compatibility with a range of applications. It offers scalability and seamless integration, making it a preferred choice for many server and enterprise environments.
CentOS delivers high performance with low memory consumption while offering customization capabilities for user access. It is an economical option that provides a secure environment with clean updates. The widespread community support and open-source nature provide it with flexibility and reliable long-term support. However, some areas for improvement identified by users include the package manager, security features, GUI intuitiveness, and hardware support. Concerns have arisen due to licensing changes and a move to a less stable branch.
What are the key features?CentOS is frequently deployed in web and application servers, virtualization, and development settings. It serves roles like web hosting, DNS management, and is favorable for Docker applications. Employed in testing environments and on-premises server management, many industries utilize CentOS for telecommunications, SIEM, and data transaction processing.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is known for its strong security, stability, automation, and support, making it a choice for entities aiming to improve operational efficiency and integration with cloud services.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers robust tools like Ansible for automation and SELinux for security, with efficient package management using YUM and DNF. It is preferred for critical applications, databases, cloud infrastructure, and virtualization due to its minimized downtime and performance enhancements. Despite its advantages, improvements are needed in pricing, documentation, and the complexity of licensing. Challenges in integrating third-party tools, Kubernetes, and cloud environments are present. Enhancement in live patching, backward compatibility, virtualization, monitoring, and storage is also necessary.
What are RHEL's key features?Red Hat Enterprise Linux is implemented across sectors like telecommunications, finance, health care, and education, often supporting critical environments with rigorous security and management needs. Its compatibility with automation and management tools like OpenShift allows for efficient handling of enterprise demands.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.