Top 10 CentOS Alternatives

Name: CentOS
Brand: CentOS
Rating: 4.2 (77 reviews)

Vendor: CentOS

4.2 out of 5

77 reviews
94% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top CentOS Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to CentOS based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Rocky Linux, Ubuntu Linux, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. CentOS surpasses its competitors by delivering a stable, robust platform with extensive community support, enterprise-level security features, and consistent updates, making it ideal for developers seeking reliability and performance for web hosting and software development environments.

CentOS Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with CentOS, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Rocky Linux

4.3 out of 5

Rocky Linux

4.3 out of 5

CentOS is valued for stability, compatibility with Red Hat packages, and cost savings, appealing to diverse deployments. In comparison, Rocky Linux offers extended maintenance, seamless migration, and improved security, attracting those seeking modern alternatives post-CentOS changes and community-driven development.

Download CentOS vs. Rocky Linux Report

Pricing

CentOS setup cost is higher with tailored enterprise support, whereas Rocky Linux offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to those seeking cost efficiency.

View comparison

Pricing

CentOS setup cost is higher with tailored enterprise support, whereas Rocky Linux offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to those seeking cost efficiency.

Ubuntu Linux

4.3 out of 5

Ubuntu Linux

4.3 out of 5

Ubuntu Linux provides robust security features, flexibility, and extensive community support, appealing to developers. In comparison, CentOS offers strong enterprise management tools aligned with Linux standards, and Red Hat's ecosystem, attracting organizations seeking budget efficiency and system reliability.

Download CentOS vs. Ubuntu Linux Report

Pricing

Ubuntu Linux features a lower setup cost compared to CentOS, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment. This cost efficiency may appeal to businesses prioritizing budget-friendly solutions without compromising on essential functionality.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

4.4 out of 5

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

4.4 out of 5

RHEL offers premium support and advanced security, ideal for enterprises needing extensive assistance. In comparison, CentOS appeals to budget-conscious users prioritizing cost-effective solutions, providing a similar codebase for compatibility and stability without the expense of dedicated support.

Download CentOS vs. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Report

Pricing

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) involves a significant setup cost due to its comprehensive support and robust features, whereas CentOS offers a minimal setup cost, making it a cost-effective alternative with fewer integrated support services.

View comparison

Pricing

Windows Server

4.1 out of 5

Windows Server

4.1 out of 5

CentOS offers free, open-source solutions with flexibility, attracting budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Windows Server, while expensive, provides robust support and integration, appealing to enterprises prioritizing seamless collaboration within Microsoft ecosystems. Both suit different needs based on budget and required support levels.

Download CentOS vs. Windows Server Report

Pricing

CentOS offers a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Windows Server incurs higher setup expenses, reflecting its premium features.

View comparison

Pricing

CentOS offers a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Windows Server incurs higher setup expenses, reflecting its premium features.

Oracle Linux

4.2 out of 5

Oracle Linux

4.2 out of 5

Oracle Linux offers features optimized for Oracle workloads, enhancing its compatibility with RHEL and providing seamless Oracle integration. In comparison, CentOS focuses on stability and extensive hardware support, providing a cost-effective solution for those prioritizing open-source standards without Oracle-specific needs.

Download CentOS vs. Oracle Linux Report

Pricing

Oracle Linux has a higher setup cost compared to CentOS, which offers a more budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Linux has a higher setup cost compared to CentOS, which offers a more budget-friendly option.

SUSE Linux Enterprise

4.3 out of 5

SUSE Linux Enterprise

4.3 out of 5

SUSE Linux Enterprise offers strong Oracle support, integrated security, and scalability, ideal for SAP HANA. In comparison, CentOS emphasizes simplicity and cost-effectiveness with strong hardware compatibility. SUSE's paid support contrasts with CentOS's community-based support, appealing to different enterprise needs.

Download CentOS vs. SUSE Linux Enterprise Report

Pricing

SUSE Linux Enterprise has higher setup costs compared to the more budget-friendly CentOS.

View comparison

Pricing

SUSE Linux Enterprise has higher setup costs compared to the more budget-friendly CentOS.

openSUSE Leap

4.6 out of 5

openSUSE Leap

4.6 out of 5

CentOS offers strong stability and compatibility with Red Hat packages, making it ideal for extensive hardware support. In comparison, openSUSE Leap attracts users with its virtualization capabilities and innovative BTRFS file system, enhancing performance and scalability. Both provide free access with no licensing fees.

Download CentOS vs. openSUSE Leap Report

Pricing

CentOS offers a minimal setup cost, making it appealing for cost-conscious users, whereas openSUSE Leap presents a higher initial investment, which might include additional features and support.

View comparison

Pricing

CentOS offers a minimal setup cost, making it appealing for cost-conscious users, whereas openSUSE Leap presents a higher initial investment, which might include additional features and support.

Fedora Linux

4.5 out of 5

Fedora Linux

4.5 out of 5

CentOS appeals to enterprises prioritizing stability and long-term support. In comparison, Fedora attracts innovators seeking the latest features with rapid updates. CentOS is cost-efficient for budget-conscious organizations, while Fedora requires frequent updates, impacting maintenance resources.

Pricing

CentOS has a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly option, while Fedora Linux involves a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

CentOS has a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly option, while Fedora Linux involves a higher initial investment.

Windows 10

4.1 out of 5

Windows 10

4.1 out of 5

CentOS offers strong stability and cost-effectiveness, appealing to enterprises with its open-source model. In comparison, Windows 10 provides ease of use and built-in security, appealing to personal users and organizations needing seamless integration with Microsoft services despite higher licensing costs.

Download CentOS vs. Windows 10 Report

Pricing

CentOS offers a significantly lower setup cost compared to Windows 10, which tends to attract users looking for budget-friendly options, while Windows 10 provides a more extensive setup that reflects its subscription and licensing approach.

View comparison

Pricing

Kali Linux

4.3 out of 5

Kali Linux

4.3 out of 5

CentOS offers stability and compliance for server environments, appealing to enterprises prioritizing performance and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Kali Linux attracts cybersecurity professionals with its pre-installed suite of penetration testing tools, making it ideal for security-focused applications and environments requiring flexibility and adaptability.

Download CentOS vs. Kali Linux Report

Pricing

CentOS presents a minimal setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious administrators, whereas Kali Linux involves a slightly higher initial cost, justified by its robust security tools.

View comparison

Pricing

CentOS presents a minimal setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious administrators, whereas Kali Linux involves a slightly higher initial cost, justified by its robust security tools.

Show 6 more products

Related categories

Operating Systems (OS) for Business

OpenStack