

Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Google Chrome Enterprise are solutions in the enterprise environment, each addressing different aspects of operational efficiency. Red Hat excels with its stability and security features, while Google Chrome fosters innovation with cloud integration and user collaboration.
Features: Red Hat offers strong scalability, robust security configurations, and a reliable environment for critical business applications. Its management tools are designed to fortify enterprise-level deployments. Google Chrome provides seamless integration with Google's cloud products, emphasizing user efficiency and cloud-native capabilities such as collaboration and security updates.
Room for Improvement: Red Hat could enhance its user interface for non-Linux users and streamline update processes to minimize reboots. Additionally, expanding cloud-native features would be beneficial. Google Chrome might work on improving offline functionality, and better support for legacy applications could be advantageous. It also lacks some of the advanced security features found in traditional operating systems.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat offers comprehensive documentation and strong customer support, making it ideal for complex on-premise deployments. Google's strength lies in its cloud-first, scalable deployment model, which pairs with straightforward administrative tools and a focus on rapid problem resolution within its ecosystem.
Pricing and ROI: Red Hat typically requires a higher initial investment due to its extensive support and customization opportunities, with potential for high ROI over time through enhanced performance and security. Google Chrome presents a cost-effective model with lower upfront costs, aiming for quick ROI by reducing infrastructure expenses and improving productivity through its streamlined cloud operations.
A long lifecycle is key to having a good return on investment.
Being able to transform common manual tasks that previously took all day into processes that take an hour, half an hour, or even less, demonstrates clear value.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux has saved us time and increased productivity.
The online support often redirects us to FAQs instead of connecting to a real person.
There could be more detailed guidance on new installations like Google Authenticator, as the process is often vague and lacks fine-tuned information.
There are features regarding QR code setup, compatibility, and security.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) support is great, as they go beyond their duty to help resolve issues and provide solutions even for third-party software such as XRDP.
When we do contact customer service, they are generally very knowledgeable and well-versed in our size.
Usually, I send the information, and they have something for me within hours, sometimes even minutes.
Firefox is slightly more efficient as it uses less memory.
I would just need to move the container I have set up on Cloud Run to a VM or cluster, which could be straightforward.
Many of our applications scale really well, with some having several hundreds of VMs, which we couldn't accomplish on Windows.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) scales very well with the growing needs of our company.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) handles increases in users, applications, or data smoothly, which is why we use it for all our projects, as it provides us with confidence.
I consider Google Chrome Enterprise to be both stable and scalable.
Google Chrome Enterprise is stable, and I haven't faced any stability problems.
It works consistently with minimal downtime and very few bugs or glitches.
It just works, and that's really the key factor; I can't remember the last time we had a system go down and had to restore it due to a bad patch.
We've not had a service outage with Red Hat in six years.
If we have a laptop with basic configuration, it eats up a lot of RAM and slows down the system.
This causes hesitation in installing them due to concerns about hidden costs and inadequate information.
Regarding Google Chrome Enterprise improvements, they need to declare some security details; they are applying security but not publishing the details about the security applied.
Addressing these limitations would significantly enhance the operating system's flexibility and efficiency.
The built-in security features of Red Hat Enterprise Linux were insufficient for our needs, necessitating the implementation of supplementary security measures.
By providing pre-installed, native automation tools within the operating system, Red Hat would streamline processes and improve user efficiency.
It's a bit on the higher side, but we prefer to stick with it because of the security, ease of maintenance, and the company's reputation.
The interface is optimized in terms of the UI and user experience.
It may be considered expensive compared to other solutions like CentOS or Ubuntu, which offer some of the same features without additional costs.
Its pricing has room for improvement because it's more expensive in the local market due to purchasing power parity in India.
Windows Servers base their cost on the number of users and have high licensing fees, while Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers free versions alongside its paid, supported versions.
The best aspects of Google Chrome Enterprise are its compatibility with everything, smooth management, and frequent security patching, which I find nice to use.
The security it offers is an advantage, which is crucial for us due to HIPAA compliance concerns.
Google Chrome Enterprise is my preferred browser over Firefox and Microsoft Edge.
It also has strong security features, is OIS and FIPS certified, and has built-in Linux security configurations.
There is also no downtime.
The operating system allows for the simple addition of kernels, modules, and other applications, making it highly adaptable to various needs.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) | 7.6% |
| Google Chrome Enterprise | 0.6% |
| Other | 91.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 87 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 49 |
| Large Enterprise | 266 |
Google Chrome Enterprise combines Chrome OS and Chrome Browser to enable work in the cloud. Manage users’ access to data, applications, and extensions without breaking a sweat. Work securely from anywhere, on any device. Your data is kept safe in the cloud.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers stability, security, and support for mission-critical applications with robust tools and scalable architecture, ideal for diverse environments and hybrid cloud compatibility.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux provides organizations with a reliable platform ideal for high-performance computing and virtualization. Known for its robust security and seamless network administration, it integrates well with OpenShift and Ansible, ensuring adaptability and scalability. Despite challenges with documentation, upgrade complexity, and cost, RHEL remains a formidable choice thanks to its comprehensive documentation and extensive community support.
What are the key features of Red Hat Enterprise Linux?
What benefits should users look for when evaluating Red Hat Enterprise Linux?
Organizations across industries like financial services, telecommunications, and application hosting implement Red Hat Enterprise Linux for server and application management. Its compatibility with technologies such as SAP, Oracle, and Ansible supports functions including web, database, and enterprise solutions, ensuring stable and secure performance in high-pressure environments.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.