Google Chrome Enterprise vs Windows Server comparison

Google and Microsoft are both solutions in the Operating Systems (OS) for Business category. Google is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. Google holds a 0.6% mindshare in OSB, compared to Microsoft’s 9.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Google Chrome Enterprise

Read 23 Google Chrome Enterprise reviews

2,517 Views
503 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Windows Server

Read 195 Windows Server reviews

10,306 Views
10,306 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Google Chrome Enterprise

Windows Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 7, 2024

Windows Server and Google Chrome Enterprise compete in the high-performance server solutions category. Users indicate that Google Chrome Enterprise offers superior features, while Windows Server excels in support and pricing but lacks some advanced functionalities.

Features: Windows Server is recognized for its extensive integration with other Microsoft products, strong security features, and robust virtualization capabilities. Google Chrome Enterprise is notable for its seamless compatibility with cloud services, faster updates, and enhanced remote management features.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest that Windows Server could improve user-friendliness, resource efficiency, and compatibility with third-party applications. Google Chrome Enterprise users note the need for broader application support, better stability during updates, and enhanced offline functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Windows Server deployment is often considered complex, requiring substantial IT expertise. Google Chrome Enterprise is praised for its smoother, streamlined deployment with minimal technical requirements. In terms of customer service, Windows Server provides comprehensive support that users find highly reliable, while Google Chrome Enterprise support is satisfactory but could benefit from faster response times.

Pricing and ROI: Windows Server generally has lower upfront costs and is perceived as offering good ROI through its robust feature set and reliable support. Google Chrome Enterprise, despite its higher initial setup cost, is considered worthwhile due to its advanced features and efficiency in cloud-based environments, leading to long-term ROI through operational savings and productivity boosts.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Chrome Enterprise vs. Windows Server Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Chrome Enterprise vs. Windows Server

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

3.3

Google Chrome Enterprise saved businesses time and lowered costs by repurposing old devices without needing new purchases.

Sentiment score

5.5

Windows Server boosts efficiency and resource management, with users reporting significant cost reductions and improved virtualization and Azure services.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Chrome Enterprise report

Windows Server offers excellent value for money, particularly when compared to alternatives.

Dan Campeanu

Security Engineer at ProVision

The tool supports many applications.

Neill-Walker

Agile Consultant at MSOLdigi

You get a standard platform that is very secure and stable.

Gustavo Schleider

Manager, Information & Cloud Systems at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Windows Server report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

3.1

Google Chrome Enterprise support is generally well-regarded but varies, with online resources being widely utilized by users.

Sentiment score

6.2

Customer service is generally effective, but technical support quality varies, and experiences with Microsoft are mixed.

The online support often redirects us to FAQs instead of connecting to a real person.

Pranay Suyash

Chief Technology Officer at MedPiper Technologies Inc

There could be more detailed guidance on new installations like Google Authenticator, as the process is often vague and lacks fine-tuned information.

SUSHEELJALALI

Operational Analyst and Architect at Hobu Online

There are features regarding QR code setup, compatibility, and security.

Sheharyar Akhtar

Data Scientist at Turing

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Chrome Enterprise report

If you go through a partner who sells or supports Windows, the support could be around seven out of ten, because Windows relies on these partners for assistance.

WilyonTjahyadi

Head of Major Account Sales Operation 1 at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Microsoft's technical support for Windows Server has been lacking, with rare responses even with premium support.

Dan Campeanu

Security Engineer at ProVision

They resolved our problems within the defined SLA.

NirajSingh

Relationship Manager at Cognizant

For more quotes and insights, download the Windows Server report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

5.9

Google Chrome Enterprise is praised for seamless scalability and efficiency, supporting organizations of any size with minimal resources.

Sentiment score

7.6

Windows Server is flexible and scalable, efficiently adapting to varying organizational sizes despite some management complexity.

Firefox is slightly more efficient as it uses less memory.

SUSHEELJALALI

Operational Analyst and Architect at Hobu Online

I would just need to move the container I have set up on Cloud Run to a VM or cluster, which could be straightforward.

Sheharyar Akhtar

Data Scientist at Turing

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Chrome Enterprise report

I've worked in companies with 20,000 to 100,000 users, and it scales beautifully without issues.

Gustavo Schleider

Manager, Information & Cloud Systems at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

The solution is used extensively in our organization, and we have plans to increase the usage.

SHUBHAM BHINGARDE

Project Engineer at CDAC

We use it everywhere, and it serves approximately two thousand users in our company as a backend service.

Khalid Mgahed

System Engineer at Alnajat charity

For more quotes and insights, download the Windows Server report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

5.6

Google Chrome Enterprise is highly stable and reliable, with minor instability on i3 processors under heavy tab usage.

Sentiment score

7.5

Windows Server is highly stable and reliable, with improvements since 2012, often rated 8-10 out of 10 by users.

I consider Google Chrome Enterprise to be both stable and scalable.

Alber Wadea

Information Security Architecture Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Google Chrome Enterprise is stable, and I haven't faced any stability problems.

SUSHEELJALALI

Operational Analyst and Architect at Hobu Online

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Chrome Enterprise report

We have experienced no blue screens or crashes and often achieved an uptime of 2,000 to 3,000 days without any issues whatsoever.

Dan Campeanu

Security Engineer at ProVision

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

GurpreetSingh4

Manager at Accenture company

I rate the stability a 9 out of 10.

Kepa-Ayerbe

Connectivity Platform Cyber Security Specialist at BASF Business Services GmbH

For more quotes and insights, download the Windows Server report

Room For Improvement

Chrome Enterprise users seek improved performance, efficient features, clearer plugin costs, better integration, and enhanced security with availability concerns.

Windows Server users seek improved security, better integration, usability, optimization, pricing, automation, documentation, patching, and technical support.

If we have a laptop with basic configuration, it eats up a lot of RAM and slows down the system.

Pranay Suyash

Chief Technology Officer at MedPiper Technologies Inc

This causes hesitation in installing them due to concerns about hidden costs and inadequate information.

SUSHEELJALALI

Operational Analyst and Architect at Hobu Online

Regarding Google Chrome Enterprise improvements, they need to declare some security details; they are applying security but not publishing the details about the security applied.

Alber Wadea

Information Security Architecture Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Chrome Enterprise report

From a security perspective, sometimes, malware attacks and hackers take advantage of the tool's vulnerabilities.

Deepak Nagar

Manager, Strategic Alliances at Softcell Technologies Limited

Deploying antivirus and firewall software on the server is advisable, but having an external firewall adds an extra layer of security.

Abey Varghese

Project and Service Delivery Manager Cloud at MANAPPURAM COMPTECH AND CONSULTANTS LIMITED

Windows Server needs to improve its speed and stability.

Daniel Hermink

Oracle business analyst at Sensience

For more quotes and insights, download the Windows Server report

Setup Cost

Google Chrome Enterprise offers competitive pricing with flexible options, appreciated for its security, maintenance ease, and reputable support.

Enterprise buyers struggle with Windows Server licensing due to its complexity, varied pricing, and high costs compared to Linux.

It's a bit on the higher side, but we prefer to stick with it because of the security, ease of maintenance, and the company's reputation.

Pranay Suyash

Chief Technology Officer at MedPiper Technologies Inc

The interface is optimized in terms of the UI and user experience.

Sheharyar Akhtar

Data Scientist at Turing

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Chrome Enterprise report

It is quite expensive.

WilyonTjahyadi

Head of Major Account Sales Operation 1 at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Previously, a Windows Server with two processors cost around two 154 euros annually, but now it is estimated to be around 3,000 to 4,000 euros for the same configuration.

Dan Campeanu

Security Engineer at ProVision

On a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I rate it ten out of ten.

Harry Murdani

Manager, IT Security at Averis Sdn Bhd

For more quotes and insights, download the Windows Server report

Valuable Features

Google Chrome Enterprise offers robust security, centralized management, and seamless integration, prioritizing speed and scalability for efficient organizational use.

Windows Server excels in scalability, security, and integration, offering features like Active Directory and seamless Microsoft tool compatibility.

The best aspects of Google Chrome Enterprise are its compatibility with everything, smooth management, and frequent security patching, which I find nice to use.

Alber Wadea

Information Security Architecture Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The security it offers is an advantage, which is crucial for us due to HIPAA compliance concerns.

Pranay Suyash

Chief Technology Officer at MedPiper Technologies Inc

Google Chrome Enterprise is my preferred browser over Firefox and Microsoft Edge.

SUSHEELJALALI

Operational Analyst and Architect at Hobu Online

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Chrome Enterprise report

The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that every Microsoft product is scalable, flexible, secure, and available on a certain budget.

Deepak Nagar

Manager, Strategic Alliances at Softcell Technologies Limited

The IP directory is the most valuable feature.

Kepa-Ayerbe

Connectivity Platform Cyber Security Specialist at BASF Business Services GmbH

I can manage the firewalls on the server easily, open or close ports to manage security traffic, and use encryption on the hard disk to keep data secure.

Mustafa Farhat

Systems technician. IT Office at LNU

For more quotes and insights, download the Windows Server report

Categories and Ranking

Google Chrome Enterprise

Ranking in Operating Systems (OS) for Business

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Browsers (1st)

Windows Server

Ranking in Operating Systems (OS) for Business

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

195

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Operating Systems (OS) for Business category, the mindshare of Google Chrome Enterprise is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windows Server is 9.3%, up from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Operating Systems (OS) for Business Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Windows Server	9.3%
Google Chrome Enterprise	0.6%
Other	90.1%

Operating Systems (OS) for Business

Featured Reviews

Sheharyar Akhtar

Data Scientist at Turing

User interface has improved navigation but demands clearer organization for consistent workflows

There is one product for operating system called Google Chrome OS Flex. Google Chrome Enterprise generally updates in the background with a button that appears for relaunching to update. The updates are frequent, occurring every two or three days. While tab history is saved, it can be inconvenient to close and reopen all tabs. When an update occurs, a button appears on Google Chrome Enterprise indicating the need to relaunch. This requires closing all Chrome windows before updating. Google Chrome Enterprise is simple to install. For Google Cloud services, installation is not necessary as services are created directly on the cloud. It is currently running on public cloud. I don't have anything deployed on other clouds, only GCP. I have rated this solution 6 out of 10.

Read full review

Gustavo Schleider

Manager, Information & Cloud Systems at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

Long-standing experience improves reliability and security, making it a trusted platform

It's difficult to see improvements when using it daily. They improved compatibility with other platforms, such as Linux. One improvement I was thinking about some years ago was the ability to manage an on-premises server from Azure. Now, they have created Azure Arc, and we are using it as a very good way of managing on-premises servers. What can be improved is on the Azure side. With Active Directory on the server side and Entra ID on the Azure side in our hybrid environment, we find issues with data syncing to Entra ID. In Entra ID, Microsoft omitted some parameters. In Active Directory, you can put an expiring date to an account, but you cannot do that in Entra ID. We have other means of doing that, but it's common to have consultants working for six months, requiring account expiration or renewal processes. The Entra ID Connect syncing tool could be improved. Though they moved the service to Azure and use an agent instead of having a dedicated server, it remains cumbersome to set up due to the differences between Entra ID and Active Directory.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	78
Midsize Enterprise	41
Large Enterprise	88

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Chrome Enterprise?

The solution's most valuable feature is its browser, which offers good performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Chrome Enterprise?

Regarding pricing, I am not aware of the prices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Chrome Enterprise?

In terms of areas for improvement, Google is improving; they are enhancing the updates and security, so they have a vision about the browser itself. Regarding Google Chrome Enterprise improvements,...

See all answers

What do you like most about Windows Server?

The tool supports many applications.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Windows Server?

The user interface of Windows Server needs improvement, especially when working with users, user accounts, and groups. There are multiple ways to accomplish tasks that do not align completely, so t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Windows Server?

I integrated Windows Server in my infrastructure. We use Hyper-V technology extensively, as it is very important for us, and it functions quite well.

See all answers

Comparisons

Island vs Google Chrome Enterprise

Compared 33% of the time

Prisma Access Browser vs Google Chrome Enterprise

Compared 17% of the time

LayerX vs Google Chrome Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

Avira Secure Browser vs Google Chrome Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

Windows 10 vs Google Chrome Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

More Google Chrome Enterprise Competitors

Windows 11 vs Windows Server

Compared 62% of the time

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs Windows Server

Compared 10% of the time

Ubuntu Linux vs Windows Server

Compared 9% of the time

Windows 10 vs Windows Server

Compared 5% of the time

Rocky Linux vs Windows Server

Compared 1% of the time

More Windows Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Chrome Enterprise

January 2026

Download Google Chrome Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Windows Server

January 2026

Download Windows Server product report

Also Known As

Chrome Enterprise

No data available

Overview

Google Chrome Enterprise combines Chrome OS and Chrome Browser to enable work in the cloud. Manage users’ access to data, applications, and extensions without breaking a sweat. Work securely from anywhere, on any device. Your data is kept safe in the cloud.

Google

Windows Server offers enterprise-grade solutions with Active Directory, Hyper-V, and Azure integration. Known for its user-friendliness and stability, it is ideal for hosting applications and managing domains, promising scalability and seamless network management across environments.

Windows Server is integral for businesses needing reliable infrastructure for server virtualization and enterprise application deployment. It excels in integrating with Microsoft applications, providing robust support for database hosting, Active Directory management, and remote access. Users benefit from its comprehensive features supporting intense workloads, virtual setups, and efficient domain management. However, it could improve its port security, vulnerability monitoring, and interface intuitiveness. Pricing models also require adjustments to be competitive, and better integration with Linux would enhance system compatibility. Regular updates can impact stability, and the command-line interface could be more efficient compared to Linux.

What are Windows Server's key features?

Active Directory: Facilitates user and resource management.
Hyper-V: Enables server virtualization for enhanced efficiency.
Azure Integration: Connects with cloud services for scalability.
Work Folder Synchronization: Supports seamless data access across devices.
Security: Offers robust measures for protecting enterprise data.

What benefits should users look for?

Ease of Use: Intuitive design simplifies administration.
Stability: Reliable performance across demanding environments.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with Microsoft services.
Scalability: Grows alongside business needs.

Windows Server is implemented across industries for virtual server hosting, enterprise application deployment, and managing complex IT infrastructures. Organizations use it for database hosting, Active Directory management, and leveraging Microsoft's ecosystem, supporting backend operations and enhancing communication security.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Netflix, Coca Cola, Pinterest, Toyota, Vertex, LafargeHolcim, MedXM, DOT Comm, Whirlpool

Rakuten, Rackspace, Tyco

Buyer's Guide

Google Chrome Enterprise vs. Windows Server

December 2025

Free Report: Google Chrome Enterprise vs. Windows Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Chrome Enterprise vs. Windows Server and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Chrome Enterprise vs. Windows Server report.

See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.

We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.