Windows Server and Google Chrome Enterprise compete in the high-performance server solutions category. Users indicate that Google Chrome Enterprise offers superior features, while Windows Server excels in support and pricing but lacks some advanced functionalities.
Features: Windows Server is recognized for its extensive integration with other Microsoft products, strong security features, and robust virtualization capabilities. Google Chrome Enterprise is notable for its seamless compatibility with cloud services, faster updates, and enhanced remote management features.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest that Windows Server could improve user-friendliness, resource efficiency, and compatibility with third-party applications. Google Chrome Enterprise users note the need for broader application support, better stability during updates, and enhanced offline functionality.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Windows Server deployment is often considered complex, requiring substantial IT expertise. Google Chrome Enterprise is praised for its smoother, streamlined deployment with minimal technical requirements. In terms of customer service, Windows Server provides comprehensive support that users find highly reliable, while Google Chrome Enterprise support is satisfactory but could benefit from faster response times.
Pricing and ROI: Windows Server generally has lower upfront costs and is perceived as offering good ROI through its robust feature set and reliable support. Google Chrome Enterprise, despite its higher initial setup cost, is considered worthwhile due to its advanced features and efficiency in cloud-based environments, leading to long-term ROI through operational savings and productivity boosts.
We're very competitive commercially and technically because of it.
We've seen value in Windows Server because the systems work smoothly without any problems.
Windows Server offers excellent value for money, particularly when compared to alternatives.
The online support often redirects us to FAQs instead of connecting to a real person.
There could be more detailed guidance on new installations like Google Authenticator, as the process is often vague and lacks fine-tuned information.
Our in-house team can also solve most issues.
If you go through a partner who sells or supports Windows, the support could be around seven out of ten, because Windows relies on these partners for assistance.
Microsoft's technical support for Windows Server has been lacking, with rare responses even with premium support.
Firefox is slightly more efficient as it uses less memory.
I've worked in companies with 20,000 to 100,000 users, and it scales beautifully without issues.
I rate its scalability a ten out of ten.
It's definitely scalable.
Google Chrome Enterprise is stable, and I haven't faced any stability problems.
We have experienced no blue screens or crashes and often achieved an uptime of 2,000 to 3,000 days without any issues whatsoever.
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
The tool is stable.
If we have a laptop with basic configuration, it eats up a lot of RAM and slows down the system.
This causes hesitation in installing them due to concerns about hidden costs and inadequate information.
The solution should improve its stability.
From a security perspective, sometimes, malware attacks and hackers take advantage of the tool's vulnerabilities.
Deploying antivirus and firewall software on the server is advisable, but having an external firewall adds an extra layer of security.
It's a bit on the higher side, but we prefer to stick with it because of the security, ease of maintenance, and the company's reputation.
It is quite expensive.
Previously, a Windows Server with two processors cost around two 154 euros annually, but now it is estimated to be around 3,000 to 4,000 euros for the same configuration.
On a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I rate it ten out of ten.
The security it offers is an advantage, which is crucial for us due to HIPAA compliance concerns.
Google Chrome Enterprise is my preferred browser over Firefox and Microsoft Edge.
I enjoy using features that are more sophisticated in terms of centralized management to maintain consistent security.
Windows Server is a stable and scalable solution.
The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that every Microsoft product is scalable, flexible, secure, and available on a certain budget.
The IP directory is the most valuable feature.
Google Chrome Enterprise combines Chrome OS and Chrome Browser to enable work in the cloud. Manage users’ access to data, applications, and extensions without breaking a sweat. Work securely from anywhere, on any device. Your data is kept safe in the cloud.
Windows Server is primarily used by organizations for hosting applications, deploying virtual machines, managing user accounts, and supporting enterprise infrastructures. It also assists in virtualization, remote access, web servers, and integrating with cloud environments.
As a key component in enterprise environments, Windows Server supports backend applications and operating systems. It's valued for its robust virtualization capabilities through Hyper-V, enabling organizations to efficiently manage resources and reduce costs. Active Directory facilitates management of user accounts and security policies. Additionally, it excels in hosting SQL databases, file-sharing, and executing communication tasks. The system's integration with Microsoft services enhances its adaptability in cloud deployments and network management. Performance and security features contribute to a reliable platform for managing diverse business operations.
What are the key features of Windows Server?Windows Server is widely adopted in industries requiring stable, secure infrastructure solutions. Enterprises leverage its capabilities for managing databases, hosting business applications, and optimizing virtualization strategies. In sectors like finance and healthcare, enhanced security features and integration with cloud environments prove essential for meeting regulatory requirements and supporting data-intensive processes.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
