Top 10 Windows Server Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

191 reviews
94% willing to recommend

1,119 followers

Top Windows Server Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Windows Server based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Ubuntu Linux, Oracle Linux, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Windows Server surpasses its competitors by offering robust security, seamless integration with Microsoft services, and comprehensive virtualization features that enhance scalability and performance, solidifying its position as a leading choice for businesses seeking reliable server solutions.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Ubuntu Linux

4.3 out of 5

Ubuntu Linux

4.3 out of 5

Both Ubuntu Linux and Windows Server offer distinct advantages. Ubuntu Linux appeals for its cost-effectiveness and open-source model. In comparison, Windows Server attracts tech buyers with its enterprise-ready features and robust integration capabilities. Ubuntu's flexibility contrasts with Windows Server's advanced security and compatibility.

Download Ubuntu Linux vs. Windows Server Report

Pricing

Ubuntu Linux has a lower initial setup cost, making it an economical choice, whereas Windows Server tends to have a higher setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.

View comparison

Pricing

Ubuntu Linux has a lower initial setup cost, making it an economical choice, whereas Windows Server tends to have a higher setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.

Oracle Linux

4.2 out of 5

Oracle Linux

4.2 out of 5

Oracle Linux stands out for its flexibility, integration with Oracle products, and lower costs making it a cost-effective solution. In comparison, Windows Server offers a robust set of features and integrated tools, appealing to those willing to invest in comprehensive functionality.

Download Oracle Linux vs. Windows Server Report

Pricing

Oracle Linux has a lower setup cost compared to Windows Server, which tends to be more expensive in the initial setup phase.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Linux has a lower setup cost compared to Windows Server, which tends to be more expensive in the initial setup phase.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

4.4 out of 5

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

4.4 out of 5

Red Hat Enterprise Linux is valued for its security and customization. In comparison, Windows Server excels in integration with Microsoft products. RHEL's open-source model appeals for cost-effectiveness, while Windows Server's extensive features justify its higher price for many enterprises.

Download Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Windows Server Report

Pricing

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) has a higher setup cost, while Windows Server offers a lower initial setup expense. Users note that RHEL's cost reflects its robust support and features, contrasting with Windows Server's more budget-friendly setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Rocky Linux

4.2 out of 5

Rocky Linux

4.2 out of 5

Windows Server is known for its robust integration with Active Directory and seamless support for Microsoft's ecosystem. In comparison, Rocky Linux offers a cost-effective, open-source solution praised for its security and resource efficiency. A tech buyer might choose Windows Server for enterprise support or Rocky Linux for budget-friendly deployment.

Download Rocky Linux vs. Windows Server Report

Pricing

Windows Server's setup costs are significantly higher compared to Rocky Linux, making the latter a more cost-effective option for budget-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

Windows Server's setup costs are significantly higher compared to Rocky Linux, making the latter a more cost-effective option for budget-conscious users.

SUSE Linux Enterprise

4.3 out of 5

SUSE Linux Enterprise

4.3 out of 5

SUSE Linux Enterprise is praised for its scalability and robust command line, offering lower initial setup costs and fast ROI. In comparison, Windows Server excels in integration with Microsoft products and comprehensive administrative tools, attracting users needing extensive features and high integration ability.

Download SUSE Linux Enterprise vs. Windows Server Report

Pricing

SUSE Linux Enterprise offers a cost-effective setup, whereas Windows Server has a higher initial setup cost. SUSE Linux Enterprise is preferred by users for its lower expenditures, while Windows Server's setup cost can be a limiting factor for some businesses.

View comparison

Pricing

CentOS

4.2 out of 5

CentOS

4.2 out of 5

CentOS, known for its open-source nature and cost-effectiveness, is favored for stability and security, supported by a strong community. In comparison, Windows Server is chosen for advanced features and integration capabilities, despite higher costs and complexity, making it ideal for comprehensive enterprise environments.

Download CentOS vs. Windows Server Report

Pricing

CentOS has a lower setup cost compared to Windows Server, highlighting CentOS's cost-effectiveness advantage. However, Windows Server offers more extensive support, justifying its higher setup cost.

View comparison

Pricing

CentOS has a lower setup cost compared to Windows Server, highlighting CentOS's cost-effectiveness advantage. However, Windows Server offers more extensive support, justifying its higher setup cost.

openSUSE Leap

4.6 out of 5

openSUSE Leap

4.6 out of 5

Windows Server excels in integration with Microsoft products and comprehensive security, while openSUSE Leap offers stability and a strong Linux performance. In comparison, openSUSE Leap provides cost-effectiveness and competitive pricing. Both platforms address different business needs, making them viable for various enterprise requirements.

Download Windows Server vs. openSUSE Leap Report

Pricing

Windows Server has higher setup costs compared to the more affordable openSUSE Leap.

View comparison

Pricing

Windows Server has higher setup costs compared to the more affordable openSUSE Leap.

Oracle Solaris

4.3 out of 5

Oracle Solaris

4.3 out of 5

Oracle Solaris is recognized for advanced security, reliability, scalability, and performance. In comparison, Windows Server excels in user-friendly management tools, integration capabilities, ease of deployment, extensive documentation, and support resources. Oracle Solaris offers strong long-term ROI, while Windows Server provides good value for investment.

Download Oracle Solaris vs. Windows Server Report

Pricing

Oracle Solaris has a higher initial setup cost compared to Windows Server, but it offers more robust security features and scalability. Windows Server, while more economical, may require additional investments for advanced configurations and security enhancements.

View comparison

Pricing

Google Chrome Enterprise

4.2 out of 5

Google Chrome Enterprise

4.2 out of 5

Windows Server offers robust security and extensive software support, making it ideal for enterprises with complex needs. In comparison, Google Chrome Enterprise excels in streamlined management and user-friendly features, particularly beneficial for organizations prioritizing cloud services. Each caters to different enterprise requirements effectively.

Download Google Chrome Enterprise vs. Windows Server Report

Pricing

Windows Server has a lower setup cost compared to Google Chrome Enterprise. Google Chrome Enterprise, however, offers a more streamlined setup process.

View comparison

Pricing

Windows Server has a lower setup cost compared to Google Chrome Enterprise. Google Chrome Enterprise, however, offers a more streamlined setup process.

Related categories

Operating Systems (OS) for Business

OpenStack

Enterprise Browsers