JIRA Service Management Reviews

We are using JIRA Service Management for change of management.

JIRA Service Management is a very user-friendly solution.

JIRA Service Management could include more AI features.

I have been using JIRA Service Management for one year.

JIRA Service Management is a very stable solution.

I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten for stability.

Around 50 users are using JIRA Service Management in our organization on a daily basis.

I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten for scalability.

I would recommend JIRA Service Management to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten.

I implement JIRA Service Management for customers. The solution is used for IT Service Management.

The most valuable features of JIRA Service Management are the service level agreement or management, and the ticketing system. Additionally, there are frequent updates that provide improvements.

I have been using JIRA Service Management for approximately four years.

JIRA Service Management is scalable.

As a consultant, I have used the support. Some of the support I have received has been good and other times it could improve.

I rate the support from JIRA Service Management a seven out of ten.

Neutral

The solution is the cloud which does not need any installation. However, we are doing implementations, and it is easy to use. For a data center, it needs installations. Data centers have a special set of load balancers, nodes, databases, et cetera. Cloud implementation is simpler than database implementation.

The price of the solution is becoming expensive and it should be reduced.

Most of the clients need to implement ITSM, which makes JIRA Service Management a crucial tool, especially if they are using JIRA software for the development team. There is integration between the two products, it's better to use JIRA Service Management when having to combine the two solutions.

The administration maintenance and daily tasks are easy but need special skills and training.

My advice to others is they need to be an expert to be able to administer it.

I rate JIRA Service Management a ten out of ten.

Our primary use case for the solution is the management of backlog and prioritizing tasks for the team. We deploy the solution on cloud.

The performance in cloud service management could be improved. For example, sometimes queries get stuck, and when you search for a specific thing, it freezes until you refresh the page. There is room for improvement.

We have been using the solution for a year and a half.

The solution is stable. Approximately 500 users utilize it in our organization.

We have not had experience with customer service and support.

We previously used Teamwork.

The initial setup is straightforward.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten. The solution is good, but the performance in cloud service management could be improved.

The most valuable features are the flexibility of defining your own workflows and automation around the workflows, and the integration with the gate or any repository.

The main issue with this solution is there's no limited subscription available for plugins we only use for a few people. If we only have a team of twenty using a plugin, we still have to purchase a subscription for the whole 200 users.

I've been using this solution for a year and a half.

We're using the cloud version, which I think is more stable than the on-prem.

JIRA Service Management is scalable, but there are some issues that cloud instances can't be linked with server-based instances.

JIRA's technical support is good and responsive.

The initial setup for the cloud instance was very straightforward.

If you're not bound to the Microsoft platform, I would say you must go for JIRA as it's more flexible than the Microsoft equivalent. I'd give JIRA a rating of seven out of ten.

ITIL Service Management - Multi National Service environment 

Interoperability of all the modules;

A unified view of work

Dev and Ops that flow

JIRA Service Management feature request List.

The products functionally is expanding rapidly, hence there is a huge backlog of Jira product feature requests that are focused on the detail functionality.

There is not enough effort focused on solving the detail functionality of Jira.

I have used JIRA Service Management for approximately three years.

I have found JIRA Service Management to be stable.

JIRA Service Management is scalable.

The technical support from JIRA Service Management has been responsive.

I've previously worked with a couple of similar solutions, such as ServiceDesk, HP OpenView, and Zendesk.

We have a complex environment, but the JIRA Service Management was quite simple to implement.

I price of JIRA Service Management is reasonable.

I would advise others that this solution is similar to any other service management solution. There's nothing out of the box, there is always a level of development that has to happen for it to work well.

I rate JIRA Service Management an eight out of ten.

We implement this solution for service management, e.g. for internal requests. If a user has a new hardware or a new internal requirement, that user will create a ticket that will be assigned to a department and correspond to our people, and then they try to swap support.

I find the user interface and support for JIRA Service Management good.

This solution also improved our IT request requirements, compared to when we were using email, e.g. it's difficult to track requests via email. With JIRA Service Management, tracking requests is better, because users contact us through tickets, and we are also able to ask for feedback from the users more easily, e.g. if our service was good, or if they have any issues with the solution.

What could be improved in this solution is its reporting function, particularly the filters. There are reports we can implement on the JIRA Service Management portal for the client we create the service for, but the report is not very good for the client. The client wants more filters on the portal, but in this case, we need to go to the portfolio to get the custom report for the client.

I've used JIRA Service Management for one year.

The support for this solution is good.

We're using the latest version of JIRA Service Management.

My rating for JIRA Service Management is eight out of ten.

We are using Service Management for the ticketing for our IT Help Desk. We are a government organization and I'm a senior manager.

We went with this product because the customer portal allows users to register tickets themselves.

Since we've moved to the cloud we've seen some improvement in foreign languages. What is lacking is the communication around these changes because we come across them almost by chance, and not because of any notification we've received. 

We've been using this solution for six months. 

The solution is very stable. 

The solution is scalable. We have currently deployed it to about 35 agents and it will be deployed to around 1200 customers. All of them deal with creating and resolving tickets.

I have no complaints with customer support. We contacted them a couple of times and even though the problem was at our end, they helped to resolve it satisfactorily. 

The initial setup was quite straightforward. We used two in-house people and one very helpful external consultant. We had about 15 half-day workshops with the consultant over a six-month period. We took our time and didn't work continuously on the implementation. 

Licensing costs are standard and can be seen on the Atlassian website. It's not an expensive solution. 

I would recommend that when deploying use an external consultant who has already used the product before. It makes things easier because they'll know what to do and, more importantly, what not to do. 

It's an ideal solution and I rate it 10 out of 10. 

We are end-users of this product.

We use JIRA Service Management as a ticket logging tool for our service desk.

The most valuable features of this solution are Incident and Request Management.

It's probably not fair of me to say because we weren't allowed to customize or configure anything. If I bought JIRA as a product, I could have it customized and configured, whereas I'm currently using a version of it provided by a much larger organization that is in line with the rest of the organization. As a result, it is not constructed in the manner that I would prefer. 

I would like to see the user interface changed, it is not very user-friendly, and it transitions workflows.

JIRA Service Management is very stable.

It's very scalable. It is constantly being scaled as our company grows and they take over other companies. JIRA Service Management is very scalable.

I can only speak for the Irish arm of the organization, which has about 80 members, but it's part of a much larger organization, and I'm not sure how many people use it in other countries.

It is the primary tool for the service desk and other IT workers. It will most likely be used more widely for other teams in the future.

Because we are part of a global organization, any issues are routed to our internal staff. I am not sure how frequently they would contact Atlassian technical support.

The initial setup was straightforward. We added it as a tenant to an existing JIRA solution.

The deployment process took a month.

The installation was all completed in-house, and we had JIRA experts on hand.

The experts were very good and efficient. They did what they had promised to do.

The main organization, the international organization, would be in charge of that. I can't say for certain, but I believe they have seen a return on investment.

We looked into ServiceNow a while ago, but we no longer have that requirement.

We use a product, but it is not ServiceNow. It's a centralized item. We were bought out by a European company. We are on their service.

Allow customization and configuration to suit your needs.

I would rate JIRA Service Management a seven out of ten.