

JIRA Service Management and Atera compete in the IT and service management category. JIRA's strength is in enterprise-level workflow customization and tool integration, giving it an edge in project management, while Atera's real-time monitoring and automation stand out for IT management efficiency, particularly for MSPs.
Features: JIRA Service Management offers detailed workflow customization, multi-role management, and robust tool integration, making it ideal for enterprises needing tailored processes. Atera excels with remote monitoring, extensive scripting capabilities, and cross-platform compatibility, catering to MSPs requiring efficient client management.
Room for Improvement: JIRA could enhance integration with non-Atlassian products, improve administration features, and offer more affordable plugin pricing, better serving smaller companies. Atera needs to develop its mobile features, expand device monitoring, and refine automation controls for greater flexibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JIRA supports various deployment models including on-premises and cloud options, though some users note slow support. Atera prioritizes cloud deployment, offering straightforward service with minimal direct support needs, making it appealing for simpler client onboarding.
Pricing and ROI: JIRA Service Management's costs can rise with plugin use and large teams, though its ROI is demonstrated in workflow efficiency. Atera's per technician pricing with unlimited device management offers cost-effectiveness for startups and growing MSPs, providing a return linked to IT management improvements.
I have reached out to customer support whenever I face an issue in JIRA, especially when creating any automation.
It supports introducing new features or levels efficiently across our global locations, helping everyone stay informed.
JIRA Service Management scales effectively as the number of users, projects, and work items increases.
JIRA Service Management's scalability is excellent; I just need to submit an email to indicate how many licenses I want.
There should be more governance for permissions and more options for customized access without frequently involving the admin.
In terms of stability, JIRA Service Management is reliable day-to-day as long as the data is fed in correctly.
JIRA Service Management is stable for my needs; I have not encountered any issues with reliability.
JIRA's user interface needs training to understand and utilize.
It remains one of the main barriers to using JIRA Service Management across our entire company.
We need to consider which AI tool would be most suitable for our project.
We used Jira's free version for some time.
While licensing is costly, setting up JIRA Service Management is overall good because the vendor helped me, and I also received support from JIRA support, making it a positive experience.
We can run commands such as PowerShell, batch scripts, and implement automation.
For every task we are working on, the project manager can see the status once we update the stories mentioned.
JIRA itself is valuable for managing tickets, user stories, and pipeline.
JIRA Service Management offers many valuable features, including automations for tickets such as automated responses and automatic workflow changes.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| JIRA Service Management | 6.9% |
| Atera | 2.2% |
| Other | 90.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
Atera provides advanced tools for remote monitoring, automation, and ticketing, offering an intuitive design and competitive pricing that supports managed service providers with monitoring, alerts, and system management.
Atera stands out with its automation, remote access, and smooth integration capabilities like PowerShell commands, TeamViewer, and Splashtop. Its monitoring and alert systems allow IT professionals to preemptively address issues, enhancing productivity with features such as a robust ticketing system, patch management, and scripting tools. Cross-platform compatibility and collaboration tools streamline IT operations. Despite its strengths, Atera requires enhancements in identity access management, chat features, mobile device management, third-party integrations, customizable reports, and more detailed role management for technicians. A renewed interface and improved network and cloud service monitoring are desired. Users also look for seamless management across diverse platforms, particularly under connectivity issues.
What are Atera's key features?Atera is widely used by managed service providers and IT support companies to enhance efficiency in industries such as manufacturing and construction. It provides remote monitoring, automation, and comprehensive IT management, ensuring seamless integration with different products and systems for broad site coverage. Businesses leverage Atera's RMM, PSA, ticketing, and IT automation features to improve operational efficiency and responsiveness.
JIRA Service Management is recognized for customization, ease of use, and integration capabilities, offering flexible workflows and dashboards that enhance ticket management in organizations.
This platform contributes to streamlining business operations with features like automation and real-time updates. Businesses implement JIRA Service Management to manage ITIL processes, support tickets, and issue tracking both internally and externally. It is utilized for project management and lifecycle tracking, with Kanban boards and Confluence integration supporting change, incident, and problem management.
What are the key features of JIRA Service Management?Service management platforms like JIRA Service Management are integral to industries focusing on managing IT services, such as tech firms and support-focused sectors. Organizations frequently utilize its capabilities to enhance their customer service operations, supporting optimal SLA adherence and efficient query management across departments. By tailoring its application to unique operational workflows, companies achieve improved service delivery and responsive issue resolution.
We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.