Kaspersky Next EDR Expert Reviews

We mainly use this solution for end user data protection, and cloud security.

We particularly appreciate how scalable this solution is, as we often need to increase our end-user numbers.

The license prices for this solution are quite high.

We have been using this solution for four years.

We have found this solution to be easily and quickly scalable.

The technical support for this solution are very quick to respond when we raise issues with them.

We were using a different product previously, but switched to this solution because it has all of the features that we require.

The initial setup for this product was very straightforward. However, deployment times will vary, depending on which client we are working with, and their particular requirements.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I'm the head of our IT department. 

I like that Kaspersky provides us with web and DNS protection over https.

Everything is automatic on Kaspersky but it would be great if they could add a feature for examining suspicious files. I'd like the solution to offer additional protection. 

I've been using this solution for one year. 

The solution is stable, we haven't had any problems. 

In our organization, each department has its own antivirus so scalability is not relevant to us. We only have four users in our department. 

I haven't needed to contact technical support. 

I previously used Avast. I switched to Kaspersky because it seemed to work more quickly detecting suspicious files without affecting our work. 

The initial setup is straightforward. We carried out the deployment in-house and it took about a week. We have a manager and a tech person dealing with the solution. We're in a small network environment and we don't need much. 

The solution is free for now. 

I rate this solution 10 out of 10. 

The most valuable feature of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is security. It has better security than other solutions, such as Symantec.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response could improve some issues and add new security files.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for approximately two years.

The stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is good.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is scalable.

We have approximately 220 people using this solution in my company.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response has good support.

I have used previously used Symantec. However, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response has better usability than Symantec. We choose  Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response because it fits the needs of our company more.

The implementation of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response was simple. It took approximately 15 days to complete across the company.

We have not seen a return on investment at this point.

The price of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is in the middle range compared to competitors. The pricing model is based on the users using the solutions. The cost for us is approximately 2200 Algerian dinars. The price of the solution could be reduced.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response an eight out of ten.

I mainly use Kaspersky EDR for BIOS protection.

EDR's most valuable feature is its basic protection from malware and viruses.

Kaspersky EDR lacks protection from recent ransomware. Because of this, we're looking into switching from EDR to another security solution.

I've been using Kaspersky EDR for two to three years.

EDR is stable.

EDR is scalable.

The initial setup was easy - I would rate the ease as four out of five.

The license for EDR costs about 1,000 pesos per user. I would rate the pricing as four out of five.

I would rate Kaspersky EDR as eight out of ten.

I primarily use Endpoint for protection against viruses.

The most valuable feature is Endpoint's management.

The main problem with Endpoint is that Kaspersky is a Russian company, and my clients prefer not to use it.

I've been using this solution for ten years.

Endpoint is stable.

Kaspersky's technical support is good.

The initial setup is easy, taking no more than a week.

Endpoint's pricing is good, especially compared to expensive solutions like Sophos.

Endpoint is a good technical solution because it provides granular control over devices. I would give it a rating of eight out of ten. 

The tool helps us to protect from hacking, malware, phishing, etc.

I like the tool’s response to malware and trojans.

The product should release more frequent updates. The tool needs to improve its scalability as well.

I have been using the solution for three to four years.

The solution is stable and I would rate it a nine out of ten.

The solution is scalable and I would rate it an eight out of ten. My company has around 500 users for the solution. We plan to increase the number of users. In the next two to three years, the number of users will be doubled.

I didn’t encounter any issues hence haven’t contacted tech support yet.

The tool’s setup is straightforward. The setup gets completed within a day.

We did the solution’s deployment in-house.

We have seen ROI with the solution’s use.

The solution’s pricing is okay.

I would rate the overall solution a nine out of ten. One IT administrator is enough to manage the solution. You need to regularly update the solution. If you don’t update regularly, then you will have more chances of encountering security threats. You need to also refrain from using unknown software.

We primarily use the solution for security.

Overall, the solution is okay.

We have a central console and from there you can monitor all workstations via an agent. The agent is installed on workstations and servers and after that, the agent can contact the central server from which we can see all of the information. We can see if the antivirus has been updated, if the solution has been detecting anything, or if there are any issues, for example. 

The pricing is very good. It's quite cheap. It might be one of the least expensive. 

It does not cover all of our security issues. It's not a complete security solution. We'd like something like CrowdStrike Falcon. We'd like the same features as CrowdStike. If they can have even better features than CrowdStrike in the future, it would be better.

The solution lacks EDR features.

The solution is cheaper than other products. However, it's not as complete. 

We are looking to evaluate CrowdStrike. We understand that that solution covers more features.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's a good product, however, it does not cover enough for us. We need something more expansive.

I mainly use EDR to scan publicly-hosted servers and ensure they get automatically segregated upon detection of any threat.

Version 14.0 comes with an SQL database, which gives great flexibility on control, reviewing logs, and viewing history.

There are some issues with EDR's web policy blocking sites that are marked as exceptions. Also, recently, some policies have been getting disabled automatically. In the next release, EDR should include a web plugin.

I've been using EDR for two years.

We haven't had any issues with EDR's stability and have had full uptime over the last two years.

EDR is scalable - we've used it for 500 workstations.

Kaspersky have stopped providing free support, and their default support is only available on weekdays.

If you have all the installers downloaded and prerequisites ready, EDR can be deployed within an hour or two.

EDR is priced on the cheaper side. Licensing for EDR is available on a yearly basis for around 80 SAR a year.

EDR is a very good tool that can be used for a large user base without lag. I would rate EDR eight out of ten.