ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus Reviews

We primarily use the solution for asset and incident management. We can use it for monitoring as well.

The mother-child features in the ticketing tool are great. You can upgrade up and down in terms of the level of importance of tickets, et cetera. 

The automation around report generation is great. It's easy to create reports and to automate who it is sent to. 

It makes the monitoring of tickets very simple. 

It is more flexible than ServiceNow in terms of cost. Its pricing is good. 

There are a lot of great templates that you can take advantage of. 

It is scalable. 

We'd like to have more integration into other platforms. 

We've had trouble transforming that data in ServiceDesk Plus, for example. 

I've used the solution for about seven years. 

The solution is stable. I've never had to worry about our subscription when I was using it. The solution is very reliable. 

The solution scales well. Even on-premises, it can scale; however, the cost would be a bit higher. It's easier to scale on the cloud. 

Support is better on the cloud than when you have an on-premises deployment. 

The local support is very accommodating. They are well-versed in the product. 

Positive

I'm also familiar with ServiceNow. 

The initial setup is easy. Migration is also very simple. You must have to create an XML file and move everything over. 

The solution doesn't really require any specific maintenance. As long as you are working on the latest version, you don't need to update to any additional features. Maintenance will only be needed if you upgrade. 

The pricing of the product is okay. We find it to be less expensive than ServiceNow. 

I was an end-user.

I am not using the latest version of the solution. I moved to another company recently. The last engagement I had with the solution was to upgrade the ServiceDesk to the latest version. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

We generally use ManageEngine for incident and problem management as well as for project and contract management. This is not a product we sell but we've deployed it in our company to manage support requests for our customers. Our customers log their issues through the ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus portal and also review the status of the logged issues. We have around 25 customers using this solution. 

This product improves the support functions and provides visibility to the status of the request and to the service levels for management and customers.  

Incident management is a good feature. In general, this is a very good product that's easy to use. The customizations are very straightforward but with limitations. We're impressed with the solution. 

We have problems with the customization of dashboards; developing them is very cumbersome and requires some knowledge of programming. In general, there are significant customization limitations to this solution. Our customers regularly ask for a dashboard to show additional details when they log an issue. They want to know the status of a ticket and whether the SLA has been violated. There is no feature for customization on some of the templates (e.g. Worklog).

The reporting feature of ManageEngine is not sufficiently rich. The reports are very two-dimensional and lack analytics. Multiple data layers can't be put on a graph. You need to extract the data and use other apps to do analytics, and do what you need offline. It lacks analytics and the option for a single view. The support is not that great and there is no one for us to ask. 

We also have challenges when incidents go to an RCA or CR. It's unclear how the different modules work tandemly within the product. It is hard to find support to know how the product is designed.

ManageEngine has no integration with WhatsApp which is a big drawback and one of the main reasons we're looking at other solutions. Also, we are looking for a product that has call center capabilities or a similar option to log requests through a phone call or through social media.

I've been using this solution for about 18 months. 

The stability is good and I haven't seen any outages or performance issues. In Sri Lanka, we have some limitations with the internet, but even with that I haven't had any performance issues.

I haven't had any scalability issues.  

I was able to get some support from the community but as an end user, I'd like to be able to get support from the company. We try to customize certain things but there's nobody to help us on our journey of using the product.

We charge the end customer if there's a CR or change management required, but I don't know how these cases work together and nobody else seems to know, including the distributor, who has very limited knowledge about the product. I'd like to see some good documentation or videos that we can look at and learn from.

Neutral

We used a free tool with in-house customization. 

The initial setup is very easy even if you don't have much knowledge. The configuration took us about a month. We took our time with it. We are constantly improving and adding new features as needed. In that sense, the solution requires management but not maintenance. 

Licensing costs are on the expensive side. We use the enterprise solution and pay around $700 per account. We're trying to keep costs down by putting only the L1 people onto the portal. The same goes for project management where we have a lot of challenges with the number of accounts ranging between 100-150. We have 60 users who need to work on the product day in and day out and we try to manage costs by having a limited number of accounts. Perhaps they could consider a licensing model for limited feature IDs, for example, where users only have access to specific features. The enterprise license includes the whole stack but not everybody needs everything. 

We looked at Freshdesk, ServiceNow, and Jira. It was a challenge to get product details and to find partners in Sri Lanka.

If you're in a mid-range environment, this product is quite good despite its limitations. Because of the drawbacks, I rate this solution seven out of 10. 

I use the solution in my company mostly for ticketing and contract management.

The most valuable feature of the solution is the core service desk part, especially when a client needs something. The client raises a ticket, and we solve it, write down recommendations or the solution, and close the ticket. We have a log of all the tickets that we had in the past PeerSpot so we can analyze what happens and so on.

Mostly that we can track the incidents, requests, and so on, making it the main purpose why we use the tool. We also can track contracts, their expiration, and so on. It is a side tool that is very useful.

I think that the tool should try to streamline the user interface even more because there are a lot of options that can be offered to users. I think that we can expect some changes in the tool's UI, as maybe ManageEngine may add something to it, but for what we are using it, I would say that the tool is good. I don't have any specific ideas of what needs to be upgraded or changed.

I have been using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for around three years. I am a customer of the tool.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution.

We received satisfactory responses to a few questions my company raised with the solution's technical support. We also use our external partner to handle any big issues. When our company contacted the external partner, they solved the problem in a short period of time.

I have not worked with any tools similar to ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus.

I am not sure if I have seen an ROI. We don't analyze it like that. We are losing less time on some things we had to do manually before, but nothing specific.

The tool's price is okay and in line with other products, maybe even cheaper than some products. There have been some changes in the pricing models in the last few years, so it is bound to change, but right now, it is okay. My company is quite satisfied with the price.

My company is not planning to switch to another tool from ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus. We are sure that we will use it for a few years, then see what needs to be done.

The self-service portal enhances our company's user experience. I would say that the tool is comprehensive. It is quite easy to manage it or to tune it for specific users.

Integrating the tool with our existing systems wasn't a big problem. Our company got some outside help, but it was quite straightforward and not overly complicated.

My company is quite satisfied with the tool's options and features.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Right now, we use ServiceDesk for help desk and ticketing, but we plan to implement asset management. 

ServiceDesk makes us more time-efficient and improves our internal service. When a user who needs help tries to contact us and we don't answer, they aren't happy.

I can't think of any single feature that stands out, but it's an excellent product for a fair price. Nothing is missing. ServiceDesk has a lot of features, and we aren't using all of them. We have to implement the ones we already have before we move on to the others. 

ServiceDesk's reporting module could use an update. It looks outdated, and the interface could be more intuitive. 

I've been using ServiceDesk Plus for a little less than a year. 

ServiceDesk is stable. 

ServiceDesk is scalable. We have about 200 users. 

We rely on the integrator for support.

Setting up ServiceDesk is straightforward. I rate ServiceDesk 10 out of 10 for ease of setup. 

We used an integrator to deploy ServiceDesk, but it was fast and painless. 

We pay for an annual license charged per technician, not end-user. If I remember correctly, it's $1,000 or $2,000 a year for seven technicians. 

We looked at other solutions, but we didn't find another system with the same features that is suitable for a small organization. ServiceDesk's price is fair, and the functionality is robust. 

I rate ServiceDesk 10 out of 10. 

I particularly liked the dashboard features. It displays reports effectively and provides notifications for new tickets assigned to us. 

Additionally, the ticket automation is impressive. When a technician is assigned to a ticket, they automatically receive a notification. 

Overall, its ease of use is very good. 

We're comparing it to other ITSM systems. The main areas for improvement seem to be Active Directory integration and Single Sign-On (SSO) capabilities.

So, I would like to have SSO as well.

We have used it, or rather, I've used it on a trial version. It was the Standard Plus edition. We were in negotiations with ManageEngine and waiting for a demo before the company decided on implementation.

It is a stable solution. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. 

There were around 30 users using this solution in total. I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. It is a scalable product.

Support was good. Anytime we raised issues, we got instant feedback. We didn't have to wait too long.

Positive

I have experience with Jira.

I highly prefer ManageEngine. Faster and better interaction. Didn't need many integrations. With Jira, especially for support, raising issues sometimes takes a day. But in interface and user experience, ManageEngine is better than Jira.

It was easy to implement. I didn't have a hard time. It was very quick, around 10 to 20 minutes.

I would rate my experience with the initial setup an eight out of ten, with ten being easy. 

It was fully cloud-based. We didn't want an on-premises solution.

I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive. It is above average. But it is neither cheap nor expensive.

Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. I would like to see a clearer distinction between ManageEngine Cloud, ServiceDesk Plus, and ManageEngine Enterprise. That way, choosing the best one is better informed. Initially, I struggled to understand the difference, but I figured it out later.

I've been involved in implementation and configuration and all the fine-tuning stuff. It's easy. 

The product helps us a lot in many respects. We have ten branches, and each branch has an average of 300 users. We're talking about 5,000 to 6,000 users across the sites. It would be very difficult if the users had to call and the IT analysts had to receive the calls. That would be a long day and a headache. 

ManageEngine has made our job a lot easier. We can handle the tickets for the users and initiate incident management, problem management, et cetera. Without SDP, we wouldn't be able to do it.

The chat box between the requester and the IT analyst is good. This feature is amazing. It can easily be between the requester and the IT analyst. 

SDP offers good customization for all workflows, which is useful. This one is very helpful in general. 

It's stable. 

We have found the solution to be scalable. 

In terms of support, actually, they take a long time. They need to be faster. They have to work on technical support. This is number one.

The UI for the app needs improvement. ManageEngine SDP hasn't had any changes in three years. There are no major changes in the UI, and other platforms get updated rather often. 

I've been using the solution for almost four years.

The solution is stable. 

I strongly recommend, before migrating or updating to any version, to make sure that your SQL database has no alerts or warnings or any kind. That could be an issue. Also, the path for the program needs to be excluded from the antivirus.

The solution is scalable. It can adapt based on your business, on workflow.

In our company, across all the IT teams, and we're talking about a three-tier system with network and onsite support, we have almost 50 to 60 people.

We may scale another ManageEngine solution in the future.

Technical support needs to be faster and more responsive. 

Neutral

We have used AD Manager and the AD Audit as well.

We had three people managing the deployment and maintenance aspects of the solution. 

We have seen a return on investment. We have seen how the users have grown in their IT background and knowledge. There is a return on investment in many aspects.

I can't speak to the exact cost of the solution. 

I'm using the current version of the solution. 

I would recommend users design the product very well at the outset. They have to make sure that the database is installed correctly, and the Windows server and the Windows server for SQL both should be on the current version and matched to avoid any troubles. This is very important.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

This is a software-as-a-service platform and we're using it for IT incident and problem management, as well as for asset management and procurement requirements. I'm the global chief information officer of the company and we are customers of ManageEngine. 

The tool is easily configurable and we can make any changes ourselves whenever we want. ManageEngine has already provided additional modules that we can integrate in the future. 

We were unable to load tickets from the previous platform to the new platform, to transfer the database of tickets and that was a problem for us. I'd like to see more flexibility in the configuration of the workflows. We currently use layouts because we know that if we need something more complex, it will be difficult to map.

We completed implementation a few months ago and I've been using this solution every since.

The solution is stable. 

The solution is scalable, we have around 30 licensed users.

We're still receiving support from the implementer so haven't had to deal with technical support yet. 

I think the implementation was pretty simple and didn't take much time. 

The solution is reasonably priced. 

We looked at ServiceNow as an option but the cost would have been about 10 times more than we're paying for ServiceDesk Plus.

In the future, we're going to see some hybrid platforms in the cloud and also in the application. Because of that, I think the solution needs to be more integratable so customers can interact easily with other platforms. 

I rate this solution nine out of 10. 

We have two use cases for this solution. Some of them are out of the box, while the other is based on the clients' or our requirements. Those are the use cases, for example, DDoS attacks we build.

What I find the most valuable about ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is the dashboard. You can build your own dashboard and the reporting is compatible with Power BI. So we built a lot of your interface data and reports via Power BI. 

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is also very easy to use. The features are okay and we never had any problems. 

With ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, for example, the configuration is easier compared to other products like it. I use SolarWinds and also ServiceNow, but I found ManageEngine configuration easier.

There is room for improvement in automation. ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus should take note of repeated incidents and automatically offer solutions to them. We have had certain incidents come up as many as ten times. 

I would like to see a few more enhanced reporting features. Right now, we do not have an integration with other reporting tools. I would also like to see a SIEM, PAM, or team tool. 

I have been using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for about five years. 

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is quite stable. We have not had any issues; we mostly use the task model. We already have more than 16 customers on the SaaS model. We are managing four on-prem. These are all government clients in different countries like Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, and Malawi. 

Our entire SOC and NOC is using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus. That's 50 agent licenses; more than 25,000 devices and 50 agents. 

We have had to use ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus's tech support once or twice. A client of ours had all of their systems on a product called ConnectWise; they had their proprietary hardware, like their firewalls, switches, access points, and routers. So we needed some help with configuring. 

Neutral

Yes, previously we were using ServiceNow, but it was very expensive and we could not use it for our assembly clients because they could not afford it. 

We also found that ServiceNow was not the optimal solution for assembly clients with 300 to 500 devices. 

The ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus SaaS model helped us because it was easy on our pockets but also easy to use, configure, and manage. Currently, we are looking into moving our bigger clients to ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus. 

The initial setup was very easy. Even the dashboard was easy to setup. 

We deployed ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus in-house. 

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is definitely worth it. We have seen a return on our investment. 

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is much cheaper than many of its competitors. We pay about nine dollars per agent and one dollar per device. There are no hidden costs. 

My advice to somebody looking to implement this solution is to first figure out how large your organization is and whether you can dedicate a team to it or if you will need to outsource the deployment. If the latter is the case, you need to look into the cost of that. The best case scenario is dedicating an in-house team to the deployment because the training that ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus provides is very good. This means you will save money. 

Integrating with other products is simple. We recently integrated with Azure Sentinel and were able to quickly collect logs connected to use cases and analyze them. ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus offers lots of connectors, which means you do not have to build them. Also, the configuration is not very difficult. For example, if you are running it in your environment, it will automatically discover all your systems and you can pick and choose which ones you want to manage and drop the rest. Then, you can start emulating and putting up SLAs, configuring them, and consequently using them.