Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo

Top 10 Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.2 out of 5
Start review

Top Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Recorded Future, and VirusTotal. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence surpasses its competitors by providing real-time threat analysis, comprehensive threat intelligence integration, and advanced machine learning capabilities, ensuring superior protection against complex cyber threats and enhancing overall security posture for enterprises.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in real-time threat response and endpoint visibility with minimal system impact, appealing to those needing advanced security features. In comparison, Microsoft Defender integrates seamlessly within Microsoft ecosystems, ideal for users seeking cost-effective security within Microsoft 365 environments.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost than Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, making CrowdStrike potentially more expensive upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost than Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, making CrowdStrike potentially more expensive upfront.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
Recorded Future
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
Recorded Future
4.2 out of 5
Recorded Future offers comprehensive data collection, actionable alerts, and flexible dashboards, proving valuable for threat analysts. In comparison, Microsoft Defender integrates seamlessly within the Microsoft ecosystem, providing robust threat detection and remediation, leveraging global telemetry data for addressing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Download Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs. Recorded Future Report
Recorded Future's setup cost is notably higher compared to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Recorded Future's setup cost is notably higher compared to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
VirusTotal
4.4 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
VirusTotal
4.4 out of 5
VirusTotal excels in user satisfaction for its pricing and customer support benefits due to its extensive database and rapid scanning. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence offers advanced threat detection and superior integration with Microsoft tools, though it is more costly yet considered a worthwhile investment.
Download Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs. VirusTotal Report
The setup cost for VirusTotal is minimal and straightforward, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence involves a more complex and higher initial cost. VirusTotal offers a quick, low-cost setup, contrasting with the higher investment required for Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for VirusTotal is minimal and straightforward, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence involves a more complex and higher initial cost. VirusTotal offers a quick, low-cost setup, contrasting with the higher investment required for Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series
4.3 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series offers robust threat management with advanced security features and cloud integration, ideal for data center security. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence integrates well within the Microsoft ecosystem, providing cost-effective solutions and valuable threat insights, especially for Microsoft-centric environments.
Download Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs. Palo Alto Networks VM-Series Report
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series has higher setup costs, offering advanced security features, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence provides a cost-effective setup with comprehensive threat detection capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series has higher setup costs, offering advanced security features, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence provides a cost-effective setup with comprehensive threat detection capabilities.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
4.2 out of 5
ThreatConnect's customizable workflows and integrations attract users, making it a flexible choice. In comparison, Microsoft Defender delivers comprehensive threat intelligence and automation capabilities, often deemed superior. ThreatConnect’s flexible deployment is valued, while Microsoft Defender is praised for ease of setup and extensive online resources.
Download Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) setup cost is higher compared to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) setup cost is higher compared to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
ZeroFOX
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
ZeroFOX
4.3 out of 5
ZeroFOX offers dynamic social media threat analytics and automated incident response, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence excels in broad threat detection and integration with other Microsoft services. In comparison, ZeroFOX needs improved reporting accuracy, whereas Microsoft Defender needs faster updates, making the latter more robust overall.
Download Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs. ZeroFOX Report
ZeroFOX has lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, which requires a higher initial investment. ZeroFOX appeals to budget-conscious users while Microsoft Defender delivers a more comprehensive threat intelligence solution for enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
ZeroFOX has lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, which requires a higher initial investment. ZeroFOX appeals to budget-conscious users while Microsoft Defender delivers a more comprehensive threat intelligence solution for enterprises.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
Anomali is attractive for cost-sensitive tech buyers with strong threat detection and easy deployment. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence appeals to those prioritizing comprehensive features and integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, justifying its higher initial costs with long-term value and functionality.
Download Anomali vs. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Report
Anomali's setup costs are typically higher compared to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, reflecting a more premium service. In contrast, Microsoft offers competitive pricing for its Threat Intelligence solutions, appealing to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Anomali's setup costs are typically higher compared to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, reflecting a more premium service. In contrast, Microsoft offers competitive pricing for its Threat Intelligence solutions, appealing to budget-conscious users.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
Cisco Threat Grid
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
Cisco Threat Grid
3.8 out of 5
Cisco Threat Grid excels in advanced analysis and seamless integration, valued for its competitive pricing. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence offers a vast threat database and automated response, worth the higher cost for its scalability and superior customer service.
Download Cisco Threat Grid vs. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Report
The setup cost for Cisco Threat Grid is higher compared to the more affordable Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Cisco Threat Grid is higher compared to the more affordable Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence
1 out of 5

Users utilize SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence for proactive threat detection, incident response, and dark web monitoring. It aids in identifying potential risks and provides real-time alerts. Users appreciate its comprehensive threat analysis, ease of integration, and efficient monitoring capabilities but note a need for better detection accuracy and integration with other security tools.

View comparison

Related categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
Threat Intelligence Platforms
Microsoft Security Suite