Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PeerSpot user
IT Administrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
Top 20
My experiences using UCMDB with Configuration Manager

With HP UCMDB we bring clarity and order to the surrounding jungle of IT infrastructure components and the myriad ways in which they're interrelated. HP UCMDB brings us a standardized data model and CMDB, which serves as a single source of truth and as a foundation for integrations with other tools in the ITSM sphere, like Service Manager and BSM.

HP UCMDB (Universal Configuration Management Database) usually comes packaged with two other products, the UCMDB Browser and Configuration Manager.

The UCMDB Browser enables us to quickly give access to the CMDB contents for large numbers of users, whereas the Java GUI allows UCMDB admins and analysts to develop Views and Reports which serve to satisfy the organization's CI information needs.

With Configuration Manager, or CM for short, it becomes possible to quickly use the discovered data in UCMDB for comparative purposes, like policy checking. The idea is that you create model, or views, in UCMDB and then use those as a basis in CM. The TQLs created in UCMDB produce CI’s, which are then used in CM to compare with each other (environment segmentation analysis), or with standards (policy checking, state comparison over time). CM can then produce lists/reports alerting you to changes, which you can then authorize. Or not.

Another approach is to quickly select a number of CI’s, like computers, compare them with one another to produce a view on the segmentation, or fragmentation, of hardware standards in IT. Any which way you use CM, it gives a configuration manager a tool to very quickly turn his new CMDB into hard currency.

If the Configuration Manager is the only one working with CM, it requires him (or her) to have an understanding of modeling in UCMDB, since models form the basis of CI checking in CM. So there’s a little ramping of knowledge, but once done, results are produced very quickly. The whole mess of CI’s suddenly comes alive and kicking.

With UCMDB version 10, HP has introduced a large number of improvements and changes. One of the main ones is the addition of inventory based discovery. It is now possible to deploy inventory scanners to target hosts, which inventory installed software using a technique called DDMi, previously found in HP Asset Manager. Now application signature based inventory and license information gathering comes into the domain of UCMDB without the need for integration.

A clear Business Case for UCMDB can be the migration of a Data Center, or the need to increase Configuration Management process credibility by improving IT infrastructure data quality.

ROI may take a little bit, because there's an investment, and it depends on the way the solution is introduced in the organization, it needs leverage by proper upper echelons sponsorship and lower echelon product evangelisation (using demos and bootcamps) how long it will take for the solution to "take", but as soon as it does, information requests will roll in from all corners and the product will prove its worth.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Senior Technical Pre-Sales Consultant / Project Manager (BSM) at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
It is built for stability and is the only solution which can support up to 60 million CIs

What is our primary use case?

Central CMDB as a single source of information for processes like Asset & Service Management (incident, problem, change, release, etc.) in keeping total cost of ownership, SLA tracking, and impact analysis.

Business service mapping (application and IT infrastructure) from an event management perspective, giving visibility into the health and performance of the CI supporting a given business.

How has it helped my organization?

Any organization can take advantage of the Automated Service Modelling (ASM) feature to discovery the dynamic changing environment and keep the business service view (dependency mapping) up-to-date, hence missing out the newly added CI for a given business service.

What is most valuable?

Discovery is possible for Workstation connecting over public IP.

Micro Focus UCMDB has an auto learning capability and groups all unidentified software, which the administrator can check and decide if it needs to be added to the repository for future discovery.

One of the unique feature is the Automated Service Modeling (ASM), which allows for modeling a business service starting from any Running Software CI and does not necessarily require having a URL.

It is AI inbuilt into the solution, by which the tools identifies non-standard software with the CI. Enable identified the same can be added in the DB.

It can also detects the software usage & metering then helps organization to comply with licensing removing unused software

What needs improvement?

Mobile/iPad Apps version of the UCMDB Browser would be a step ahead, which should have features, like viewing CI information, ownership, etc.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No. Micro Focus UCMDB is built for stability and is the only solution which can support up to 60 million CIs.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues. Micro Focus UCMDB is highly scalable. It supports horizontal and vertical scaling.

How are customer service and technical support?

Good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Not applicable.

How was the initial setup?

Installation is straightforward. It seamlessly integrates to other vendor solutions to pull the CI into Micro focus UCMDB.

What about the implementation team?

I have implemented the solution with the help of my team members.

What was our ROI?

It can save a lot of effort in capturing unplanned changes.

UCMDB can detect changes and auto open an unplanned change request in Service Manager, hence controlling unauthorized changes. At the same time, it can be complaint from licensing perspective, which can save up to 50% of the cost which arises from non-compliance due to vendor licensing.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Setting up the framework with integration can take from one week to one month and will depend on the requirements and the integration.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Not applicable.

What other advice do I have?

Before implementing, you must finalize the output requirement, i.e., CI grouping/category, attribute, relationship types, etc. This will help in defining the information collection process.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB
May 2025
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Service Management Consultant with 10,001+ employees
Real User
It can feed in from multiple sources and upload into various Service Management toolsets

What is our primary use case?

Mainly, it is used as a central repository to store our CMS data from various sources. We use it to store data from collection points as well as upload them into tools, such as Service Manager.

What is most valuable?

The ability to use it as our single source of truth. It can feed in from multiple sources and upload into various Service Management toolsets, not just Micro Focus ones.

How has it helped my organization?

It has allowed us to centralise the feeds and sources. Previously, like many companies, we stored CMS data in various places and various systems, and they did not always match.

What needs improvement?

Some of the UI could always be improved, but that is personal taste. I am a big fan of removing thick clients and thick servers and making everything Web UI.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Perhaps, we used various Service Management toolsets to store data.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user