Oracle VM VirtualBox is a cost-free, user-friendly virtual machine platform that supports multiple operating systems and offers features like snapshots and seamless file sharing while allowing the execution of diverse environments on one machine.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Oracle VM VirtualBox | 6.3% |
| Hyper-V | 19.8% |
| VMware vSphere | 19.1% |
| Other | 54.8% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Server Virtualization Software | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Oracle VM VirtualBox vs VMware vSphere | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Oracle VM VirtualBox vs Hyper-V | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Oracle VM VirtualBox vs Proxmox VE | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMware vSphere | 4.4 | 19.1% | 94% | 461 interviewsAdd to research |
| Hyper-V | 4.0 | 19.8% | 86% | 145 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 246 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 124 |
| Large Enterprise | 289 |
Guests on Oracle VM VirtualBox benefit from its ease of setup, support for multiple OS, and advanced features like cloning and Remote Desktop Protocol access. Its compatibility with formats such as VMware and QEMU enhances its adaptability. However, users suggest enhancements in networking capabilities, remote accessibility options, and cross-platform operation support. While the interface is simple, improvements are desirable for better file management between host and virtual machines. Despite identified performance limitations, it remains a stable and flexible choice for running concurrent environments on a single system.
What core features enhance its usability?Oracle VM VirtualBox is widely implemented in testing environments, software development, and educational contexts. It aids in quality assurance, server virtualization, and cross-platform deployment across Windows, Linux, and Solaris. It supports managing network environments, overseeing databases, and delivering enterprise applications efficiently, finding extensive use in technology experimentation and solution development across industries.
Airbus, Colorado State University, SCS Africa, Wolf Medical Systems.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Officer at ADN Telecom | 4.0 | I use Oracle VM VirtualBox for testing applications and operating systems in my home lab, appreciating its seamless guest OS compatibility. However, more API access would improve usability, and my usage hasn't been extensive enough for detailed ROI evaluation. |
| Chief Executive Officer at Kipustec | 4.0 | I use Oracle VM VirtualBox for quality assurance in an educational setting. It's easy to install and user-friendly, ideal for learning and tool testing. The snapshot feature aids in backup management, and I find it efficient and reliable. |
| Senior IT Consultant at Xerif | 4.0 | I use Oracle VM VirtualBox across various environments, finding it easy to use and flexible across operating systems. However, stability issues push me toward KVM. Despite this, the tool offers a quick ROI, making it valuable for my needs. |
| Consultant at SmartCloud | 5.0 | I use Oracle VM VirtualBox to implement VMs because it's compatible with Oracle products and provides realistic machine experiences. However, it needs better scalability and flexibility for desktops with limited capacity, as memory and storage constraints are challenging. |
| Senior System Engineer at Microstuf Computers Clinic Inc | 3.5 | I use Oracle VM VirtualBox to run Linux operating systems and find its ability to manage multiple operating systems through one application extremely valuable. However, the graphics functionality needs improvement, particularly with display resolution when scrolling through the taskbar. |
| Adjunct Professor at a university with 501-1,000 employees | 4.0 | I use Oracle VM VirtualBox to create various virtual operating systems like Ubuntu and Windows. I appreciate its snapshot feature for OS recovery and easy cloning. However, it struggles with antivirus compatibility, unlike my experience with KVM and other virtualization services. |
| Managing Director | 4.0 | I use Oracle VM VirtualBox to enhance my clients' performance and security. It's easy to administer and mostly free, except for the extension pack. However, it lacks a dedicated web interface, relying on third-party options, which I find unsatisfactory. |
| ICT Manager at LPEC | 4.5 | I'm a teacher utilizing Oracle VM VirtualBox for teaching and testing. Its features, like snapshots and virtual networking, enhance my productivity and testing capabilities. Though the solution offers great functionality, I wish it was more stable compared to alternatives like Workstation. |
| Sr. Tech Systems Architect at Intuitive | 4.0 | I use Oracle VM VirtualBox for multi-platform development and testing. It's easy to set up with good host-VM integration and a good ROI. However, the user interface, management software, and scalability all need improvement. |
| IT Manager at TGR | 5.0 | I find this solution simple, stable, and scalable for preparing VM environments, with easy deployment, and it's faster than VMware. However, the GUI and command-line interface require improvement for volume management. I rate it 10/10. |
Oracle VM VirtualBox is used to test applications and operating systems.
It should be for everyday use because when I want to test any operating system or servers that need to be tested, I test them on Oracle VM VirtualBox.
I am not sure about extensive usage as I did not scale that much. I use it only for my home labs, so I did not need to scale significantly.
The most valuable feature is the seamlessness. When I install a Linux operating system, I can use Windows applications through Oracle VM VirtualBox seamlessly.
There are many applications that work only on Windows. For desktop testing purposes, I used Oracle VM VirtualBox, and it works fine.
The guest OS compatibility was tremendous because I used Oracle VM VirtualBox on Linux and ran Windows applications on top of that, working seamlessly.
If there were more API access so that I could run it headlessly, similar to Proxmox where I can use API, it would be useful. Having some kind of API to maintain Oracle VM VirtualBox would be beneficial.
I have been using Oracle VM VirtualBox for more than 17 years.
There were no difficulties with deployment.
It was smooth and easy because it was meant just for development, nothing else. For personal use, it was smooth and easy.
For home lab use and for those who do tests on home labs, it is scalable.
I did not need to scale significantly.
Their forum and documentation is more than enough for technical support.
I have not contacted them for any issues.
Positive
I am not on the latest update currently.
The initial setup took just a couple of minutes.
Because it is easy to use and open source, it is free to use for any lab environment.
It is totally open source and free, so we do not have to pay anything.
It should be rated more than seven or eight because I tested only in my home environment. I did not perform any long-term stress tests, just for a couple of hours or days on every application. After testing, I destroy the VM and run new tests.
For these couple of days of usage, I would rate it seven to eight out of ten.
Maintenance is not necessary because I did not use it for heavy loads.
I am using Proxmox, not Oracle VM VirtualBox in my organization.
For personal use I use other solutions, but for my company I use Proxmox.
I would recommend Oracle VM VirtualBox to others.
I have not used it for AI. I use separate VMs and separate servers.
I would need to check the version as I am away from my PC currently.
Overall, I would rate Oracle VM VirtualBox eight out of ten for personal use.
Neutral
I use VirtualBox in almost all environments. I use it in testing, developing, and production, with very good results.
The product is very easy to use. It is very flexible. VirtualBox is available on almost all operating systems, like Windows, Linux, and macOS. These are the most important features of the tool. The solution is very easy to configure and adapts to my resources, even if they are small. It can easily adapt to any resource, from an old personal laptop to a medium-sized server.
The tool has some stability issues. Sometimes, the virtual machines just stop working without any apparent reason. That's why I'm migrating to KVM. I've managed to use other IT resources, like distributed storage, to reach an HA environment using VirtualBox. It would be very good if VirtualBox had its own high-availability environment. It will be a very good improvement.
I have been using the solution for more than ten years.
I encountered some stability issues in the last two years.
Oracle’s support is almost the same as that of KVM. I've been working with the VirtualBox community and documentation. The documentation is very good. It has use cases, questions, and answers for people worldwide. We receive excellent support from the community.
The initial setup is very easy. I rate the ease of setup a ten out of ten.
We get a very good return on investment. For example, if I invest $100, depending on the project, I receive a very good income in two to three months and save my initial investment. The product produces a very quick ROI.
The pricing is flexible. When Oracle bought VirtualBox, they introduced some licensing issues. However, it did not affect the terms of licenses and additional costs. The price is okay. I rate the pricing a three out of ten. The tool is not as expensive as other products. It is not free if I want to use it in a commercial environment.
I have machines with AI elements, but I use them only for testing.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
We can use the solution to implement VMs.
The product is more compatible with Oracle products. The product gives us the flexibility to try different machines. It provides the experience of a real platform.
The product should improve its scalability. It should be more flexible to be used with desktops with different capacities. We do not have much storage on our desktops, and we must allocate a certain amount of memory to install the product. When we install a virtual machine, we have a limit that we cannot exceed 80% of RAM.
I have been using the solution since 2012.
I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.
I rate the product’s scalability an eight out of ten.
We can get the solution from the solution’s website for free if we encounter any errors. Oracle’s support team should improve its response time. Our customers shout at us sometimes when we take a long time to resolve their issues because they are losing time on their businesses. We could not respond to the customers quickly because we were waiting for Oracle to respond to our queries. Once, when we logged an Oracle SR, the team kept on referring us to one technician after another.
We used a different solution. Its performance would depend on the results, and it gave us problems. I switched to VirtualBox because it is more compatible with Oracle products.
The initial setup is simple. Oracle provides the necessary documentation. The product has its own website from where we can get all the information we need.
I deployed the solution by myself.
Though our customers like the product, they do not like its price. They still complain about the pricing. Oracle should consider reducing the cost of the product.
When you install the solution, it will require at least 8GB RAM. Sometimes when I run some resources, the product starts crashing because of a problem with the host machine. I have not compared the product with VMware. I am yet to use many of the features provided by the solution. Overall, I rate the product a ten out of ten.
We use Oracle VM VirtualBox to run Linux operating systems in our environment.
The product’s most valuable feature is the ability to manage multiple operating systems through one application.
They could improve the graphics functionality of the product. At present, we encounter challenges related to display resolution while scrolling up and down through the taskbar.
We have been using Oracle VM VirtualBox for two to three years.
We have 60 to 90 Oracle VM VirtualBox users in our organization.
The initial setup of Oracle VM VirtualBox is easy. However, the requirement to install Microsoft Visual C++ 2019 during the setup process is challenging for some users. They could provide an extension within the application for users to download and install components directly from the website in the background.
The product is easy to use. I rate it a seven out of ten.
I use Oracle Virtualbox to create different virtual operating systems, including Ubuntu, Kali Linux, Windows, and Metasploit.
I like that Oracle VM VirtualBox has snapshots with which I can always go back to when my OS was functioning properly, and then I easily clone an OS without having to install it all from scratch.
Oracle VM VirtualBox doesn't work properly with an antivirus tool. I think Oracle has to come up with something that makes VM VirtualBox compatible with different antivirus applications. Though you can get Oracle VM VirtualBox running properly even without an antivirus tool, it keeps you vulnerable.
I have experience with Oracle VM VirtualBox.
Oracle VM VirtualBox has a platform where the support team responds to frequently asked questions by its users. Every time I have had issues with Oracle VM VirtualBox, I always get a solution from Oracle's online platform or GitHub. I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.
Positive
I have experience with KVM. I have used KVM since my company did software testing for four months. I also use other virtualization services.
I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.
I use Oracle VM VirtualBox to provide my clients with performance, security, and scalability enhancements.
I like that Oracle VM is safe and stable. It is also very easy to administer. For example, opening a VM or adding a host adapter is extremely easy.
The most attractive feature in Oracle VM is that it's free except for the extension pack.
Oracle VMs don't have a solid web interface of their own. This is an area where Oracle is lagging behind. Now, we use headless servers, install Oracle VMs, and manage them remotely. We could use phpVirtual Box, but it is a third-party solution. A lot of people contribute to it, and it's not authenticated by Oracle. As a result, I don't find it to be a good option. Therefore, I would like to see Oracle offer an extension pack or a licensed version that fixes this problem.
I've been using this solution for almost four years.
It's a stable solution, and I would rate stability at ten out of ten.
Oracle VM VirtualBox's scalability is good, but resizing of storage can be a bit challenging sometimes. I would give scalability a rating of eight out of ten.
I focus mostly on SMEs, particularly those who run their enterprise solutions on cloud-based services.
The initial deployment is quick and takes about 10 minutes.
I deploy it and maintain it myself, along with the help of an administrator.
Price wise, Oracle VM VirtualBox is a six on a scale from one to ten.
I would definitely recommend Oracle VM VirtualBox. It can work from your laptop, and even a a loop configuration laptop is more than sufficient for testing. Another advantage is that it has teleporting, and you can also directly port your virtual machine configuration into Oracle cloud.
Overall, I would rate Oracle VM VirtualBox at eight out of ten.
I'm a teacher and I use the solution for teaching and testing.
I have been able to test and roll back features if I need to. I have snapshots and a virtual network if I need to.
The functionality and productivity are very good.
I can test and roll back features in my work.
It's a big platform. It's very useful.
I like that it has a snapshot feature.
The virtual network is great. There are a lot of features. It has everything I need.
The product is free to use.
It's easy to set up.
The solution is a bit less stable than I would like.
I've used the solution for maybe eight years. I have a lot of experience with it.
The stability needs some improvement. It's less stable than I would like. Sometimes it gets hung up. For example, if I import some files from my students, the files cannot get removed. Instead, it crashes.
I don't deal with scalability. I just use it on a laptop. I don't use it on a cluster. I don't need to scale.
Right now, I use it personally for teaching and for my own work.
I've also worked with Workstation.
It is straightforward to set up. It is not complex at all.
The solution is free to use.
I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. I've been pleased with its overall capabilities.
The primary use case of the solution is to develop, test, and deploy solutions on multi-software platforms so that users can use solutions on different platforms such as Windows, Linux, Solaris, and Macintosh. This also will help users and groups to use the devices they are comfortable with and not depend on a specific platform. Users no need to wait for very powerful machines instead they can use their laptops or desktop to test or solve to see whether it really works or meet their needs.
Oracle VM Virtualbox is easy to use and does not require much training.
It uses fewer resources. Any user can configure it on my desktop or laptop and also it can be exported to VMware Center.
Teams using new operating system releases can quickly test and implement. This would make the development of new software releases faster and easier. It also helps users to write the program, test, and support it on multiple platforms.
It has a good community as it is open-source.
The integration betweeen the host vs VM is good. Oracle VM virtualbox integration betweeen host and VM is very easy. There is no need for a big infrastructure to support the development, testing, and deployment. You can run multiple operating systems on a single machine especially.
The product offers dynamic sizing and customization. Based upon the project or specific requirements users can easily customize dynamically.
There is great virtualization support on major operating systems. All major operating systems offer support and guest operating systems offer support as well.
The user interface needs to be improved. The command line interface is okay, however, the Web Manager is not working well and there are many enhancements requried. The web user interface would help users who do not have much experience with the product.
Managment and maintenance software needs to improve, including improving the methods for stopping and starting the machine.
Improvements are needed for areas such as changing the disks or resources used. They need to have live mgiration betweeen other platforms like VMware, Microsoft, and Nutanix.
I've used the solution for 1.5 years.
The scalability is okay, however, it needs improvement.
Technical support is okay.
Neutral
The initial setup is easy and straightforward.
The Roi has been good.
It is easy and open-source is available.
We also looked into VMware.
I would suggest the user test and take decision.
I use the solution for personal use and in a professional environment. We use a couple of them. We use it to prepare environments to deploy them on another VM environment like VMware. We need to prepare the machine for the quality and we use this.
Overall, the solution works very well and we have been happy with it.
It's easy to configure it on my desktop, have it certified, and then export it to VMware Center.
It's very simple to use.
We like the stability.
The solution can scale well.
To make changes, you need to use the command lines. You need to use them to change the volume or extend or re-sync the volume. We've tried to do so using the web manager and it's not working well. Basically, the GUI and command-line interface need improvement. We'd like the command line to manage the VDI disk.
I've used the solution from the beginning, from the very first one. It's been more than five years.
The stability of the product is quite good. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze.
I find scalability quite easy. I'm used to it and I know how to handle it.
We have about ten to 20 people using the product. A few use it on-premises, for example, for the larger service. All people will use it in the cluster.
I've never had to contact technical support and therefore cannot rate their services.
I've also tried VMware solutions. It's not as fast, the VMware.
The initial setup is very simple and straightforward. It's not overly difficult or complex.
The deployment is very fast. It takes less than five minutes. It's easy to implement even by yourself.
We have ten technical people using the resolution and helping to deploy and manage it. They are IT managers and engineers.
It's easy to deploy. You do not need assistance.
We're still dealing with POCs. In the future, if it works okay, we'll try it in a larger environment.
I'm just an end-user.
We are using the latest version of the solution.
The whole solution we are trying to study for large infrastructure and we are making POC of that process. If this works, we will try to generalize it on an older platform.
I'd advise people to try it. It's very simple and easy to deploy.
I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
