Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Reviews

Vendor: Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention?

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is a cloud-based security service that combines cutting-edge technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, and expert human monitoring, to effectively thwart advanced threats like malware, zero-day attacks, and command-and-control threats. It offers inline protection, scrutinizing all network traffic irrespective of port, protocol, or encryption. An integral component of Palo Alto Networks' security platform, it enjoys widespread adoption across diverse organizations. With its robust security capabilities, it's an ideal choice for entities of all sizes, particularly those in high-risk sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government agencies, seeking to safeguard their networks from a broad spectrum of advanced threats.

Get the Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, Fortinet FortiGate, Darktrace and more!
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is the #6 ranked solution in top Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software. PeerSpot users give Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is most commonly compared to Fortinet FortiGate: Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Fortinet FortiGate. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 51% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 13% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
September 2025
Get the report
Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Featured Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reviews

Read more reviews

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention mindshare

As of October 2025, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category stands at 5.6%, up from 5.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention5.6%
Fortinet FortiGate16.6%
Darktrace13.8%
Other64.0%
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

PeerResearch reports based on Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryIntrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)Oct 4, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersOct 4, 2025Download
ComparisonPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs DarktraceOct 4, 2025Download
ComparisonPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Check Point IPSOct 4, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Fortinet FortiGate4.216.6%92%574 interviewsAdd to research
Darktrace4.113.8%94%82 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention features highly rated include Wi-Fi capabilities, sandboxing, malware protection, next-generation firewall, application quality of service, content filtering, URL filtering, IP address management, intelligent firewalls, application control, vulnerability protection, simplicity, ease of management, threat database, machine learning, real-time response capability, behavioral analytics, and heuristic-based scanning. Users appreciate its stability, user-friendly interface, and comprehensive support for advanced threat detection and prevention strategies.
  • "Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention provides protections against both known and unknown threats quickly, and they have great Cyber Threat Alliance integration, which allows anything that is even unknown to get to our systems quickly in terms of being patched."
  • "I rate Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention as nine out of ten."
  • "The most valuable feature is its use of machine learning to detect potentially unknown threats."

Room for Improvement

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention could enhance email filtering, expand AI analytics, and address false positives. License costs and pricing require adjustment. The setup process and documentation need improvement. Technical support, particularly in Saudi Arabia, warrants enhancement. The interface should be more intuitive for users new to the platform. Additional features like SD-WAN and improved resource consumption are desired. Integration using ICAP protocol could provide seamless operation with other solutions.
  • "While Palo Alto excels in certain setups, they need to improve the user experience in distributed working conditions."
  • "The behavioral detection capabilities could be expanded to address all threats at the perimeter, reducing the reliance on endpoint detection and response systems."
  • "There is a potential drawback with the lack of support for the ICAP protocol."

ROI

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention demonstrates strong performance with fast, comprehensive security features. Users report significant ROI and increased revenue, especially notable in Italy. Despite its high cost, it offers good value for the investment. Customers appreciate the protection, leading to retention, cost savings, and insightful threat analysis. The precise financial impact might be hard to quantify due to a layered defense approach, yet overall satisfaction and growth indicate a positive outcome.

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is viewed as competitively priced yet higher than many alternatives. Users acknowledge the robust features and high performance, especially for larger enterprises which justify its cost. Licensing is typically annual without hidden fees, though initial hardware investments add to expenses. Discounts are limited compared to competitors like Cisco. The solution is particularly costly for smaller businesses but valued for its extensive threat prevention capabilities and scalability.
  • "Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is quite competitive, offering extensive threat detection and prevention capabilities, though it is priced higher than some alternatives."
  • "The product’s pricing is expensive for small companies."
  • "The price of the solution is higher than others on the market. A price reduction would be beneficial if it does not impact their database quality."

Popular Use Cases

Users predominantly utilize Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention for firewall use, threat detection, and application control, with deployments both on-premise and in the cloud. Key functions include content filtering, intrusion detection, encryption, and network segregation. The platform's machine learning capabilities enhance malware detection and block threats using embedded signatures. It ensures comprehensive security for LAN and WAN traffic, essential for businesses across financial and educational sectors, offering agencies and companies around-the-clock protection.

Service and Support

Customer service and support for Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention are generally praised for being responsive and effective. Some users report satisfaction with the knowledge and assistance provided, although others note challenges with local and third-party support, especially in specific regions. Ratings vary, with some users indicating room for improvement in communication and response times. Despite some minor issues, many users express contentment with the overall level of support.

Deployment

Many describe Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention's initial setup as straightforward and intuitive, while others note complexity when compared to alternatives like Fortinet and Cisco. Setup times vary widely, from hours to months, influenced by network complexity and size. Vendor assistance often aids deployment, with some using tools for policy conversion. Companies with complex networks find setup challenging, whereas those with less complicated needs face a simpler process. Customization and learning curves affect deployment duration.

Scalability

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is highly scalable, suitable for both small and large enterprises. It supports a wide range of users and systems, with many praising its implementation flexibility. Most feedback highlights its ability to accommodate tens of thousands of users and servers effectively. Although its pricing may affect expansion, its technical scalability remains robust. The adaptability to varying business needs further solidifies its position as a reliable choice in network security.

Stability

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is highly stable. Many users report no issues, noting it outperforms competitors like Fortinet or Check Point. No frequent stability problems are mentioned, with most bugs addressed quickly. Stability is praised, with several rating it ten out of ten. Users recommend following the recommended PanOS version to prevent instability. Some mention occasional false positives and note that proper firewall sizing prevents performance issues.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business132
Midsize Enterprise75
Large Enterprise212
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Performing Arts
6%
University
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Retailer
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Non Profit
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Construction Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Security Firm
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%

Compare Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention customers

University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia

Related questions

  • 104
What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
  • 15
When evaluating Intrusion Detection, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 120
What is your recommended cost-effective solution to detect and prevent APT attacks?
  • 5
What product do you recommend for a Campus IPS appliance implementation?
  • 40
How do you use the MITRE ATT&CK framework for improving enterprise security?
  • 198
What are the pros and cons of Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon vs alternative EPP solutions?
  • 164
Which alternative solutions (other than Darktrace) do you recommend for an SMB?
  • 11
Which is the best intrusion detection and prevention solution?
  • 11
What is the best IDPS security tool and why?
  • 710
What is Cognitive Cybersecurity and what is it used for?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Fortinet FortiGate vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Vectra AI vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Vectra AI vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Cisco IOS Security vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Cisco IOS Security vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Proofpoint Identity Threat Defense vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Proofpoint Identity Threat Defense vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Fortra's Tripwire Enterprise vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Fortra's Tripwire Enterprise vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Zscaler Cloud IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Zscaler Cloud IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
See all alternatives
 
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Global Network Tech Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.0I've used Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention for years due to its strong threat detection, real-time protection, and analytics, though I think usability in hybrid environments and pricing could use improvement as AI threats evolve.
Principal Security Architect at Deloitte4.5I use Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention for intelligent threat protection, focusing on both known and evolving threats with behavioral analytics. While its integration is seamless within the Palo Stack, expanding detection and reducing false positives would enhance effectiveness.
Presales Engineer at SAUDI PARAMOUNT COMPUTER SYSTEMS1.5I have implemented Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention since 2020 and appreciate features like GlobalProtect VPN, but support in Saudi Arabia is slow, and overall, I rate it 3 out of 10 due to service limitations.
Senior Network Security Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.5I use Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention for its IDS and IPS functionalities, finding it effective with a strong sandboxing tool and advanced URL filtering. However, it needs better signature granularity and expanded machine learning capabilities.
Director of Sales at S4E Serbia4.5I use Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention for detecting unknown attacks using machine learning, offering significant ROI and inline security without cloud reliance, though there's room for improvement in ICAP protocol support. Overall, it's a time and money-saving solution.
Senior Network Support Engineer at Amadeus4.0I use Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention to analyze traffic patterns and implement URL filtering. Although similar to Cisco, I need to propose adding Wildfire for enhanced security, but licensing and approval are pending for further deployment.
Network Security Engineer at Mauritius Telecom4.0I use Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention to protect servers because it's stable and highly rated by Gartner. While the product is reliable, its pricing and dashboard need improvement. Previously, I used Fortinet and Cisco solutions.
Senior Client Manager at GBM4.0I find Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention valuable for its top-notch security gateways and endpoint protection, along with an excellent threat database. However, the commercial offering could use improvement compared to competitors like Fortinet. Deployment options include cloud or on-premise.