The customers who have the use case of monitoring the file server and want to know the user's activity. It's the Power Admin's requirement, actually. Power Admin has been recommended, plus Power Admin has some quick features in place of DLP features, actually.
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
I work with two solutions. Both solutions are super, actually. So with the DLP, if the customer needs a DLP, I would prefer to go with Power Admin.
What needs improvement?
There is room for improvement in terms of the pricing model.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with this solution for about a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability an eight out of ten. Power admin also has this capability. So the solution has the capability, actually.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. There is always room for improvement.
Out of 100, there will be 40 to 50% of customers using this solution. So, there are quite a number of customers.
How are customer service and support?
There is only conversation via email, no support on this patch.
How was the initial setup?
The setup takes half an hour. It will be a little complex.
What about the implementation team?
For the deployment process, check the prerequisites for the file server for the capability to install the product. That's it. You can use that.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It will be costly. Actually, it will be more expensive compared to the other solutions. I would rate the pricing a two out of ten, with one being expensive and ten being cheap.
The licensing model will be in an annual subscription.
What other advice do I have?
If customers need a solution with a file server with DLP, then we recommend using Power Admin PA. It's a nice product. You can use that.
Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises

