Pure FlashArray X NVMe Reviews

We are using this solution for our on-premises, private cloud.

The most valuable feature of this solution is reliability.

The UI for this solution needs to be improved.

This product is very stable and I have had no issues.

This solution is very scalable. It's good enough for us at the moment.

I have had no issues with technical support.

The initial setup of this solution is straightforward.

We used an integrator, WWT, to assist us with our implementation. We have had no issues with them.

Our licensing fees are $500,000+ USD.

VMware benefits our IT organization because of its ease of deployment and manageability.

We are using VMware on Pure, and we have implemented this because of the speed. VMware is faster, so it helps when you log in.

We use vCenter integration. It helps because you can see the storage added, and manage it from vCenter with a single console.

The cost for Pure may be high, but the reliability and scalability make it well worth the money.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We use this solution for our primary storage. Our deployment is in a private cloud environment.

Using this solution has benefitted us operationally by making us more efficient.

VMware benefits our IT organization through cost efficiency.

The most valuable feature of this solution is its ease of use.

I would like to see replication and DR features in the next release of this solution. 

This solution is pretty stable.

We have not tested scalability yet, so it is to be determined.

Technical support for this solution is very good.

We did not switch from a previous solution. We brought this in as a way to improve operational efficiency, which is something that we're always looking for.

The initial setup of this solution was straightforward. It was an easy setup.

We used an integrator for our deployment, and our experience was ok.

We have not yet seen ROI with this solution.

We considered IBM and Dell EMC for our storage solution. 

My advice for anybody who is researching this or a similar solution is to give it a shot.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We use the on-premise deployment model of this solution. Our primary use case is for machine learning analytics.

It has benefited my organization because it has reduced time to insights. 

Its agility has been a benefit for our IT organization. We are running VMware on Pure. The main driver was FlashStack. The joint solution has helped my organization through its support. 

The performance is the most valuable feature of this solution. 

We have taken advantage of the VMware integrations developed by Pure with the validated design, FlashStack CVD. The integration has helped in the way that engineers feel competent that the solution is designed correctly.

In the next release, I would like to see real-time analytics for further insight into consumption models.

The scalability and telemetry analytics could be improved.

The stability is good. 

It is somewhat scalable but it's not infinitely scalable. They could improve the petabyte-scale with greater capacities. 

We haven't needed to contact technical support. 

We knew that we needed to switch because our system wasn't performing so we knew we had to buy something. We liked Pure because it had a good pitch.

The initial setup was straightforward. 

We did the deployment in-house. 

We have seen a two year ROI. 

With VMware, we pay $300,000 annually. 

We also evaluated Hitachi, Nimble, and EMC. We went with Pure because they have the best pitch.

The advice I would give to someone considering this solution is, don't wait. Go for it. 

I would rate it a seven out of ten. There is room for improvement.