Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pure FlashArray X NVMe pros and cons

Vendor: Pure Storage

4.5 out of 5

36 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

Pure FlashArray X NVMe delivers outstanding performance and ease of deployment with efficient storage management. It provides superior compression, deduplication, and minimal latency for real-time visibility, yet faces limitations with replication, VNC integration, and enterprise backups. Security features like DDoS protection enhance reliability, though pricing remains high and additional file storage support is needed. Despite these minor drawbacks, FlashArray significantly enhances processing speed and resource efficiency.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Pure FlashArray X NVMe provides superior performance with low latency and high Ops, ensuring reliable and fast storage solutions.

Its ease of use and straightforward setup make it a user-friendly option for deployment.

The high data compression and deduplication rates allow for efficient use of storage, maximizing capacity without sacrificing performance.

Robust security features, including signature security technology and excellent DDoS protection, ensure data protection and seamless failover capabilities.

Technical support is proactive and responsive, offering excellent diagnostics and monitoring capabilities to address issues promptly.

CONS

Pure FlashArray X NVMe requires improvement in replication and disaster recovery features.

Integration with enterprise backup systems and direct network access like a NAS is desirable for Pure FlashArray X NVMe.

Pure FlashArray X NVMe's current pricing structure is more expensive compared to competitors.

Better information tracking for LUNs and enhanced visibility into garbage collection and CPU performance are needed for Pure FlashArray X NVMe.

Pure FlashArray X NVMe should expand its portfolio to include smaller boxes to cater to the SMB market.

Pure FlashArray X NVMe Pros review quotes

SD

CTO at Secure-24

Nov 11, 2018

It's incredibly easy to use and greatly simplified our ability to both deploy and manage our storage subsystems.

Read full review

Head DBA and Technical Management at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Nov 21, 2018

We're able to get higher-density workloads on the same infrastructure, and we have a smaller physical footprint. The performance is excellent – during our test the bottlenecks are never on the X array, it just keeps picking up the pace to match what you need. The real-time visibility is a differentiator in my opinion.

Read full review

CIO at Mid America Clinical Laboratories

Sep 3, 2019

The most valuable features of this solution are its ease of use and performance.

Read full review

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Free Report: Pure FlashArray X NVMe Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Pure FlashArray X NVMe. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Sep 3, 2019

The most valuable feature of this solution is its ease of use.

Read full review

IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Sep 3, 2019

The most valuable feature of this solution is reliability.

Read full review

Director at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Sep 3, 2019

It has benefited my organization because it has reduced time to insights.

Read full review

Senior Systems Administrator at a consultancy with 5,001-10,000 employees

Sep 3, 2019

What I really like about this program, is that it is easy to use and easy to configurate.

Read full review

RZ

Manager of IT Department at Office of Technical Inspection in Poland

Feb 18, 2020

Overall stability is very good. It is a very stable solution.

Read full review

HH

Managing Director at Dr. Netik & Partner GmbH

Jun 18, 2020

One of the best features is the support, which is excellent.

Read full review

reviewer1052424

Chief Infrastructure & Security Office at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Oct 4, 2020

It is very easy to install and configure. It has got excellent diagnostics. If you really need to see how the box is performing, the console gives you a lot of information. You can set thresholds as well as alerts based on the thresholds, which is a very powerful functionality. They are very proactive. They know how to monitor and manage the systems. They see a problem, and they are all over it before us. They see the problem before we see it, which is very good.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 34)

Pure FlashArray X NVMe Cons review quotes

SD

CTO at Secure-24

Nov 11, 2018

I want to see Pure Storage not only be for fast storage, but I want to see it be for the entire data center.

Read full review

Head DBA and Technical Management at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Nov 21, 2018

We've seen that when we create a POD in synchronous mode, it increases the latency.

Read full review

CIO at Mid America Clinical Laboratories

Sep 3, 2019

We would like to see VNC integration or be able to use Pure Storage with VNC.

Read full review

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Free Report: Pure FlashArray X NVMe Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Pure FlashArray X NVMe. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Sep 3, 2019

I would like to see replication and DR features in the next release of this solution.

Read full review

IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Sep 3, 2019

The UI for this solution needs to be improved.

Read full review

Director at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Sep 3, 2019

In the next release, I would like to see real-time analytics for further insight into consumption models.

Read full review

Senior Systems Administrator at a consultancy with 5,001-10,000 employees

Sep 3, 2019

Every time I think of something that needs to improve, they're one step ahead, which I love. The only area I wish to see improve, I believe is coming, is in the FlashBlade product. Blade implementation fell short on a few of the services.

Read full review

RZ

Manager of IT Department at Office of Technical Inspection in Poland

Feb 18, 2020

In terms of what needs improvement, the dashboard and management could be simplified.

Read full review

HH

Managing Director at Dr. Netik & Partner GmbH

Jun 18, 2020

In the future, I would like to see integration with enterprise backup systems.

Read full review

reviewer1052424

Chief Infrastructure & Security Office at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Oct 4, 2020

Right now, the box itself is just strictly working as a backend storage system. It would be fantastic if we could access it directly like a NAS device through network access or SIS drives. I think they have an interface, but I am not sure how good it is. If we could address a box directly on the network without having to go through a server, it would be great. The replication schemas could be improved. We are not using replication on the storage level right now. We use a different type of replication. If their replication would be as good as the one that we have, I would probably run the replication schema because it might be faster, but I don't know that for a fact. So, I cannot say that they have good replication. All I can say is that they need to inform us better.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 34)

Product Categories

Product Categories

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

All-Flash Storage

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Dell PowerStore vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Pure Storage FlashArray vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

NetApp AFF vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

HPE Alletra Storage vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Dell Unity XT vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

IBM FlashSystem vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Dell PowerMax vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

HPE Nimble Storage vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

NetApp ASA vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

NetApp NVMe AFF A800 vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

TrueNAS X-Series vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

All-Flash Storage

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Dell PowerStore vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Pure Storage FlashArray vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

NetApp AFF vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

HPE Alletra Storage vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Dell Unity XT vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

IBM FlashSystem vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Dell PowerMax vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

HPE Nimble Storage vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

NetApp ASA vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

NetApp NVMe AFF A800 vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

TrueNAS X-Series vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

See all alternatives

Related questions

73

Which SAN product would you choose: IBM FlashSystem (FS9500) vs PureFlash Array/X NVMe vs PureFlash Array/XL NVMe?

93

What is the best solution for an enterprise-level storage environment?

56

How would you recommend selecting a compute and storage solution based on the company size?

444

Does NetApp offers Capacity NVMs All-Flash Storage Arrays?

28

When evaluating NVMe, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

38

Why is NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays important for companies?