Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Radware Cloud WAF Service based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Azure Front Door, and AWS WAF.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Radware Cloud WAF Service surpasses its competitors by delivering advanced threat detection, real-time attack mitigation, and seamless integration, ensuring superior application security and performance.
Radware Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Radware, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks excels in cloud-native protection, offering dynamic workload identity and integration across multi-cloud environments. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service provides strong DDoS protection and bot management, appealing to those prioritizing web application security and a user-friendly API Discovery feature.
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Radware Cloud WAF Service. Radware’s offering is more cost-efficient upfront, appealing to users prioritizing initial affordability over extensive features.
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Radware Cloud WAF Service. Radware’s offering is more cost-efficient upfront, appealing to users prioritizing initial affordability over extensive features.
Azure Front Door offers seamless Microsoft integration and robust security features for global scalability. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service provides comprehensive threat protection using machine learning. Tech buyers may choose Azure for network optimization or Radware for advanced threat detection.
AWS WAF provides seamless integration with AWS services and flexible pricing, appealing to those already within the AWS ecosystem. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service offers advanced bot protection and robust analytics, making it suitable for enterprises needing comprehensive security and analytical capabilities.
AWS WAF has a lower initial setup cost, making it cost-effective for smaller deployments, while Radware Cloud WAF Service involves higher setup costs but offers advanced features suitable for larger, more complex needs.
AWS WAF has a lower initial setup cost, making it cost-effective for smaller deployments, while Radware Cloud WAF Service involves higher setup costs but offers advanced features suitable for larger, more complex needs.
F5 Advanced WAF offers extensive features like anti-bot protection and IP intelligence with a focus on comprehensive security, appealing to users needing strong protection. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service excels in CDN integration and automation, ideal for budget-conscious clients seeking flexibility.
F5 Advanced WAF offers an upfront setup cost that users find significantly higher, while Radware Cloud WAF Service is appreciated for its relatively low initial investment.
F5 Advanced WAF offers an upfront setup cost that users find significantly higher, while Radware Cloud WAF Service is appreciated for its relatively low initial investment.
Fortinet FortiWeb excels with comprehensive security features and machine learning, appealing to users needing integrated security fabric. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service offers intuitive analytics and DDoS protection, suitable for buyers seeking CDN functionality and effective bot management.
Fortinet FortiWeb has higher initial setup costs compared to Radware Cloud WAF Service, which offers a more cost-effective implementation, highlighting a key difference in the financial approach between the two solutions.
Fortinet FortiWeb has higher initial setup costs compared to Radware Cloud WAF Service, which offers a more cost-effective implementation, highlighting a key difference in the financial approach between the two solutions.
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is praised for its affordability and ease of use, making it suitable for budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service offers advanced features like bot management, appealing to enterprises with complex security needs willing to invest more.
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall presents a straightforward setup cost, contrasting with Radware Cloud WAF Service, which may involve a more complex and higher initial expense. This highlights Cloudflare's potential cost-efficiency advantage over Radware's premium setup requirements.
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall presents a straightforward setup cost, contrasting with Radware Cloud WAF Service, which may involve a more complex and higher initial expense. This highlights Cloudflare's potential cost-efficiency advantage over Radware's premium setup requirements.
Imperva Web Application Firewall offers easy deployment and strong bot protection, ideal for enterprises needing extensive DDoS security. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service excels in integration and pricing, benefiting those seeking flexible, modular cloud features with competitive costs.
Imperva DDoS offers robust threat protection and easy configuration with advanced features. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service provides efficient CDN security and automatic threat detection. Tech buyers might choose Imperva for bot management, while Radware is ideal for API protection and heavy traffic management.
Azure Web Application Firewall offers cost advantages and seamless Azure integration, appealing to budget-conscious tech buyers. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service provides specialized security features and deployment flexibility, making it suitable for organizations needing robust protection and cross-platform integration capabilities.
Azure Web Application Firewall offers a straightforward setup at a lower cost, while Radware Cloud WAF Service incurs higher initial setup fees. Azure is more budget-friendly for initial deployment compared to Radware.
Azure Web Application Firewall offers a straightforward setup at a lower cost, while Radware Cloud WAF Service incurs higher initial setup fees. Azure is more budget-friendly for initial deployment compared to Radware.
Radware Cloud WAF Service excels with user-friendly analytics and easy integration, ideal for finance sectors needing competitive pricing. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF, recognized for AI-driven security and comprehensive threat prevention, appeals to those prioritizing advanced security capabilities over cost.
