Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Front Door vs Radware Cloud WAF Service comparison

Microsoft and Radware are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Microsoft is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0, while Radware is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.9. Microsoft holds a 4.5% mindshare in WAF, compared to Radware’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Radware users who would recommend it.
Azure Front Door
Read 15 Azure Front Door reviews
  • 3,053 Views
  • 1,590 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Radware Cloud WAF Service
Read 32 Radware Cloud WAF Service reviews
  • 2,714 Views
  • 472 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Azure Front Door and Radware Cloud WAF Service both compete in the web traffic management category. Radware has an edge in threat detection and advanced protection features.

Features: Azure Front Door offers network-level traffic inspection, SSL offloading, and includes customizable WAF policies integrated with CDN and load-balancing, suitable for organizations entrenched in Azure's ecosystem. Radware Cloud WAF Service provides in-depth threat detection, advanced bot management, CDN performance enhancements, and valuable machine-learning capabilities to identify unknown threats.

Room for Improvement: Azure Front Door could improve by broadening its cloud vendor compatibility and reducing latency. There's also room for better product clarity. Radware Cloud WAF Service could enhance ease of integration, refine its API discovery feature, and improve support response times while addressing false positives more effectively.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Front Door is praised for its seamless integration with Microsoft services and adequate customer support, though variability exists based on personnel. Radware Cloud WAF offers a smooth deployment process potent in hybrid cloud adaptability, though some users face a steeper learning curve initially. Both have robust customer service and public cloud functionality.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Front Door has competitive tiered pricing but can become costly in premium tiers. Its ROI is positive, due to efficiencies and security. Radware Cloud WAF is pricier, especially with advanced features, but offers comprehensive security packages that deliver a notable ROI through superior threat prevention.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Front Door vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Azure Front Door vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.6
Azure Front Door offers cost savings and efficient management, yielding a clear return on investment despite initial transition uncertainties.
Sentiment score
8.1
Radware Cloud WAF Service boosts ROI through enhanced security, reduced costs, minimized risks, and increased operational efficiency.
Azure Front Door offers a quick return on investment once it is set up.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report
I wouldn't be able to give a number, but Radware Cloud WAF does save time for our staff due to the automation and excellent detection, which is invaluable.
With our on-prem solution, we spent a lot of time on maintenance tasks, OS updates, and ensuring appliances ran smoothly, but with Cloud WAF, all that is managed by the cloud team, allowing us to focus on alert analysis.
Radware Cloud WAF has helped reduce false positives and efforts, which in turn, improved the total cost of ownership by freeing up time to focus on other projects.
For more quotes and insights, download the Radware Cloud WAF Service report
BP
HI
AA
reviewer2102988 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Azure Front Door receives high marks for customer service, with users praising knowledgeable support staff and clear documentation.
Sentiment score
7.9
Radware Cloud WAF Service excels in responsive, knowledgeable support, though clients seek extended service for faster issue resolutions.
I am able to set up a critical call with Microsoft, and they respond quickly to tickets with the highest severity.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report
The support provided by Radware's Emergency Response Team is excellent.
We have ERT premium support with a five-minute SLA.
They are usually very fast in response.
For more quotes and insights, download the Radware Cloud WAF Service report
BP
OMPRAKASH - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2102988 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2667027 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Azure Front Door offers scalable, reliable solutions for enterprises, enhancing performance and managing applications efficiently despite higher costs.
Sentiment score
8.3
Radware Cloud WAF Service offers seamless scalability and integration, effectively handling high traffic for diverse global applications.
I find that Front Door can become expensive for large-scale projects with more transactions and users.
I consider the scalability of Azure Front Door to be strong.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report
The scalability of Radware Cloud WAF Service rates as a perfect ten out of ten, as we haven't encountered any scaling issues.
Since it's a Cloud WAF, it is always scalable.
I would rate it nine out of ten in terms of handling the capacity and volume.
For more quotes and insights, download the Radware Cloud WAF Service report
MN
BP
AA
reviewer2102988 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer1854075 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Azure Front Door is praised for high stability and reliability, though some DNS management issues are occasionally noted.
Sentiment score
8.2
Radware Cloud WAF Service is highly stable and reliable, with minor past issues that have been mostly resolved.
I rate Azure Front Door's stability a nine because it is easy to make updates through Azure Portal.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report
I have never encountered downtime, maintenance-related issues, or latency.
The stability of Radware Cloud WAF Service is excellent, and I would rate it as a ten.
There have been no issues with downtime, bugs, or glitches.
For more quotes and insights, download the Radware Cloud WAF Service report
BP
OMPRAKASH - PeerSpot reviewer
CT
reviewer1854075 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Room For Improvement

Azure Front Door requires enhancements in multi-cloud support, load balancing, IP support, latency, UI, pricing, rules, monitoring, and APIs.
Radware Cloud WAF Service needs improvements in integration, UI, reporting, support, licensing, scalability, and tool integration for performance enhancement.
If I could use Azure Front Door with private IP addresses, it would be more beneficial.
The only significant adjustment required is with URL set parameters that need to be passed for an existing domain.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report
It would be beneficial if we could perform POST requests and integrate our applications more effectively.
The documentation is not up to par, as while the platform's system is robust, the documentation, particularly for API integration, could be more developer-friendly with real-world use cases.
Improving dashboard capabilities to provide this information clearly for management is crucial.
For more quotes and insights, download the Radware Cloud WAF Service report
MN
BP
reviewer1854075 - PeerSpot reviewerTanuj-Garg - PeerSpot reviewerOMPRAKASH - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

Azure Front Door's pay-as-you-go pricing offers flexibility, with costs and value balancing for various project needs.
Radware Cloud WAF Service offers mid-range pricing with modular licensing, extra feature costs, and negotiation flexibility for enterprises.
Azure Front Door is cheaper for small projects, companies, or applications compared to using separate tools.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report
Pricing could be more competitive, especially for smaller customers.
I find Radware Cloud WAF to be a quite expensive product compared to others.
The pricing is not cheap; it is expensive, but it is effective.
For more quotes and insights, download the Radware Cloud WAF Service report
MN
reviewer2102988 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2667027 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2619747 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Valuable Features

Azure Front Door provides scalable, secure, and affordable solutions with advanced features like SSL offloading, load balancing, and DDoS protection.
Radware Cloud WAF offers robust Layer 7 protection with advanced features like bot management, DDoS defense, and user-friendly management.
Azure Front Door provides DDoS protection and features related to WAF.
Azure Front Door includes a built-in web application firewall, which performs signature-based checks of the request payload, offering protection against common attacks or malicious requests.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report
The most important aspect of Radware Cloud WAF is that it is over the cloud, offering a comprehensive solution that includes WAF, API protection, bots, and Layer 7 DDoS.
It has features such as API security that protect against advanced attacks, including business logic attacks.
Radware Cloud has significantly reduced attacks on our applications.
For more quotes and insights, download the Radware Cloud WAF Service report
MN
BP
reviewer2102988 - PeerSpot reviewer
AA
OMPRAKASH - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Front Door
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
13th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
CDN (2nd), Microsoft Security Suite (18th)
Radware Cloud WAF Service
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
9th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Azure Front Door is 4.5%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Radware Cloud WAF Service is 1.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
 

Featured Reviews

SayedAbdelrhman - PeerSpot reviewer
Provide bot protection and has proficient documentation
During our discussion with the internal Microsoft team about assessing our environment, they confirmed that we have sufficient security measures, especially regarding edge protection. Internally, we believe we are now certified. In the future, we could consider adding layer four protection from the firewall. Front Door combines CDN and WAF protection, so further enhancing its features could benefit both the customer and us. We monitor the number of users attempting to access our IP or DNS servers. When designing the system, we initially needed to ensure our environment was protected with a WAF. However, WAF is currently too costly for us, so we created private links and connected them to Front Door. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Read full review
Tanuj-Garg - PeerSpot reviewer
API discovery, bot defense, and DDoS capability optimize application security and development
I see areas in Radware Cloud WAF Service for improvement, specifically in its initial tuning period, because the machine learning model takes two to three weeks for baseline behavior establishment. Closely monitoring alerts during this period is essential to avoid false positives. There's an alert noise issue; during the early stages, we received a high volume of alerts for minor issues, requiring collaboration with the SOC team to fine-tune thresholds and concentrate on genuine threats. The documentation is not up to par, as while the platform's system is robust, the documentation, particularly for API integration, could be more developer-friendly with real-world use cases.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
22%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Retailer
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?
We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the...
See all answers
What do you like most about Azure Front Door?
Rules Engine is a valuable feature.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Front Door?
I am not sure about the pricing but believe Azure Front Door might require a higher cost due to its entry point nature.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware Cloud WAF Service?
I would rate the cost around seven out of ten. Radware provides many different options, but it may not be affordable for companies that aren't large.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Radware Cloud WAF Service?
When it comes to support, I would suggest having a dedicated number for our clients for better identification in case of issues, as the varying numbers make it easy to miss important calls. Additio...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Radware Cloud WAF Service?
Our use cases for Radware Cloud WAF Service include all of our applications, such as online banking applications, as I work for a bank. It works effectively. Our payment systems also operate throug...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Cloudflare vs Azure Front Door Logo
Cloudflare vs Azure Front Door
Compared 17% of the time
Amazon CloudFront vs Azure Front Door Logo
Amazon CloudFront vs Azure Front Door
Compared 15% of the time
Akamai vs Azure Front Door Logo
Akamai vs Azure Front Door
Compared 12% of the time
AWS Global Accelerator vs Azure Front Door Logo
AWS Global Accelerator vs Azure Front Door
Compared 10% of the time
Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Azure Front Door Logo
Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Azure Front Door
Compared 4% of the time
More Azure Front Door Competitors
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Radware Cloud WAF Service
Compared 29% of the time
AWS WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
AWS WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service
Compared 19% of the time
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Radware Cloud WAF Service
Compared 18% of the time
Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Radware Cloud WAF Service
Compared 9% of the time
Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service Logo
Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service
Compared 7% of the time
More Radware Cloud WAF Service Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Azure Front Door
June 2025
Azure Front Door reportDownload Azure Front Door product report
Buyer's Guide
Radware Cloud WAF Service
June 2025
Radware Cloud WAF Service reportDownload Radware Cloud WAF Service product report
 

Also Known As

Azure Front-Door
No data available
 

Overview

Azure Front Door is employed for securing external traffic, global load balancing, integrating web application firewalls, enabling disaster recovery, and enhancing application accessibility.

Organizations leverage Azure Front Door to support data publishing, act as a CDN, and ensure low latency for global users. Clients use it to protect numerous internet-accessible applications, integrate with DNS, and implement custom routes. Favored for caching web content and securely, efficiently distributing traffic to backend services, Azure Front Door offers SSL offloading, traffic inspection, and global scalability. Users value its affordability, ease of implementation, and web application firewall. Azure Front Door provides rich security features, traffic management, and URL rewriting. Load-balancing capabilities enhance performance with additional content security policies and bot protection. Integrations, including with GitOps, along with combined CDN and load-balancing, are also highlighted.

What are the most important features?
  • SSL Offloading: Reduces the burden on backend services
  • Traffic Inspection: Enhances security by inspecting incoming traffic
  • Global Scalability: Ensures performance for users worldwide
  • Web Application Firewall: Provides in-depth security features
  • Load Balancing: Distributes traffic to improve performance
  • URL Rewriting: Customizes URL paths for better navigation
  • Bot Protection: Shields applications from automated threats
  • Integrations: Supports technologies like GitOps
  • Combined CDN and Load-Balancing: Streamlines content delivery and traffic management
What are the benefits or ROI of using this service?
  • Affordability: Provides cost-effective solutions for web traffic management
  • Ease of Implementation: Streamlines setup processes for quick deployment
  • Enhanced Security: Offers robust protection for web applications
  • Improved Performance: Optimizes traffic distribution and latency
  • Scalability: Supports growing application demands with global reach

Azure Front Door finds usage across multiple industries due to its versatile applications. E-commerce companies benefit from improved global accessibility and speed, while financial institutions leverage its security features for protecting sensitive data. Media and entertainment sectors use its CDN capabilities for seamless content delivery, and healthcare providers rely on its compliance and protection standards for patient data security.

Microsoft

Radware’s Cloud WAF provides enterprise-grade, continuously adaptive web application security protection. Based on Radware’s ICSA Labs certified, market-leading web application firewall, it provides full coverage of OWASP Top-10 threats and zero-day attacks, while implementing both negative and positive web application security models to automatically adapt protections to evolving threats and protected assets.

Radware’s Cloud WAF offers full web security protection including OWASP Top-10 coverage, advanced attack protection and 0-day attack protection by implementing both negative and positive web application security models. It provides organizations “frictionless” application protection by automatically detecting and protecting new web applications as they are added to the network through automatic policy generation technology.

Radware
Buyer's Guide
Azure Front Door vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service
June 2025
Free Report: Azure Front Door vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Front Door vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Azure Front Door vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service report.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.