Seqrite Endpoint Security Reviews

Our company uses the solution for endpoint security. Initially, we had a security breach so we installed it. 

Three technical team members use the solution for delivery and order management on top of another system. We have 150 overall users throughout our company. As new employees come in, we add them as users. 

We have a newer importer method and the solution notices things downloaded from the internet site. It is a sorting system for downloads that includes encrypted IDs and management. 

We were not using video Skype in our company because the product was not depending on a defensive solution. Since we installed the solution, we receive performance analysis and endpoint protection that includes anti-malware defense, malicious detection, and prevention of ransomware attacks. 

The solution effectively detects malicious files and blocks sign-ins. 

The solution works well as an endpoint and antiviral solution. 

The solution could integrate with other products to provide a comprehensive protection strategy. 

The solution could enhance its monitoring capabilities from the end-user side. 

I have been using the solution for six months. 

The solution feels very stable. 

The solution is scalable. 

I have not needed technical support. 

I previously used Trend Micro. 

Our company installed the solution in-house. Ongoing maintenance is handled by our technical team and is not difficult. 

It is difficult to compare Trend Micro with the solution. Trend Micro works on any computer and Seqrite has its own, unique computer. Each product has its specific merits. 

Trend Micro includes the same kind of endpoint security. 

The solution provides delivery management and notifications for broad monitoring of the IP. 

I definitely recommend the solution and rate it a seven out of ten. 

Most clients in India are price-sensitive and are always looking for cost-effective solutions, especially when it comes to endpoint security, with ease of use being their top priority, followed by deployment and cost. These are the main driving factors when customers buy in India. Additionally, Seqrite Endpoint Security offers both one-year and three-year plans, which are more cost-effective and enticing for customers.

The two valuable features are anti-ransomware and data loss protection.

Sometimes, small and medium businesses, or even startups with just five, ten, or fifteen systems, are also keen to secure their data. There is a reluctance on the part of the technical team to extend installation support when the opportunity sizes are smaller.

Seqrite Endpoint Security has a lot of value. Still, its marketing could be done much better on a larger scale, especially in India, in light of the new DPDP 2023 Act, which the Indian Parliament passed. It would be even more valuable if Seqrite could incorporate features to help companies comply with this law, it would be even more helpful.

I have been using Seqrite Endpoint Security as a reseller for four years.

The product is stable. I rate the solution’s stability a seven out of ten. 

The solution is scalable. We sell close to 15-20 orders every year.

The customer service has a good team. In India, they have a good contact center who are responsive and good.

The initial setup is straightforward and can be done in the daytime within a day.

The solution has reasonable pricing. There is one pricing without any hidden charges. They have to pay once a year or three years.

The product is easy to deploy. There are not many dependencies on the technical guy. Just one technical guy is enough to help in the department.

I would tell them to use the solution because it is very user-friendly and simple and does not require a technical person to manage the policies on the dashboard. Even a non-IT guy with a bit of knowledge can handle the console.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use Seqrite to provide endpoint security for Linux systems.

I like Seqrite's web protection features and external device control.

I would like to see Seqrite add a remote profile so we can implement different policies for users connecting to the in-office LAN and those accessing the office network from home or a public internet connection.

I have been using Seqrite for four years.

We've had a few users complain about performance, but we can fix that issue by adjusting the configuration and excluding some processes.

We have around 300 licenses and haven't noticed any performance issues so far. 

We didn't have an endpoint security solution for Linux before Seqrite, but we are using Sophos and Kaspersky for Windows endpoints.

Setting up Seqrite was easy. We didn't have much trouble installing it, and the vendor provided excellent support during deployment. Our total deployment time was 15 days.

I rate Seqrite eight out of 10.

We use the solution for antivirus endpoint security for all our end users.

Seqrite Endpoint Security provides a good amount of security and there are additional features, such as delicate prevention, which we are using.

We found the DLP to be innovative and useful. We didn't use it before, so it is a good feature.

Currently, we are using signature-based security. This means that we are using signatures to map security behaviors. We would like to move to signature-less security in the future. This would mean that we would use behaviors to protect our system. We would like the solution to have integration with other security solutions so that we can have a single base for monitoring all the security incidents and concerns.

I have been using the solution for six months.

I give the stability of the solution an eight out of ten.

I give the scalability a nine out of ten.

We have 500 people using the solution and depending on if that number increases we will scale up.

The technical support is good.

The initial setup is straightforward. I give the setup a nine out of ten.

Deployment time is based on the number of users. For a single user, deployment should take about half an hour.

The implementation was completed in-house.

Commercially we have seen a return on investment, compared to our previous solution, Seqrite Endpoint Security is less expensive.

I give the cost of the solution a seven out of ten. the solution is affordable.

Along with Seqrite Endpoint Security we also evaluated Sophos.

I give the solution a seven out of ten.

I recommend the solution and if possible organizations should use the cloud version instead of the on-prem.

We use the solutions for both servers and desktops at our organization.

Its best feature is the ability to manage assets.

We are facing a ransomware issue. That's why we plan to change the solution. In the next version, they should improve the areas of utility control and centralized management.

We have been using the product for the last four years.

It is a stable product.

It is a scalable product. We haven't faced any issues for four years. 

The solution's tech support team is good.

We have used different products. We switched to Seqrite due to its cost and other methods.

The setup process was easy for our remote clients and us as well.

I recommend others use the solution and rate it as a nine.

The primary use case of the solution is for anti-virus security.

The solution can be deployed on-prem and cloud.

My client is very familiar with and satisfied with Seqrite. They have a long history of using the solution and find it to be the best option available.

The overall performance of the solution is better than the competition.

The cost of the solution can be improved.

The trial version of Seqrite Endpoint Security can be longer so potential customers have enough time to evaluate.

I have been using the solution for six months.

The solution is stable.

I have not used the solution for long and therefore I give the scalability a five out of ten.

The solution has no issues currently, but if I have trouble, I raise the ticket, and their technical team quickly responds and solves our problem.

We previously used Siemens tech and Sophos before switching to Seqrite Endpoint Security. Some of our clients are still using Siemens and Sophos because they are familiar with those solutions and are not able to easily change to a different solution. Some clients are trying to change and for those clients, we provide information about Seqrite Endpoint Security.

I give the initial setup an eight out of ten. The installation is not difficult and only takes a few minutes.

The implementation was completed in-house.

The licensing fee is 200 Bangladeshi Taka per client per year.

I give the solution a six out of ten because I do not have much experience using the solution yet to properly provide an overall rating.

I recommend the solution to others.

I use this solution for the advanced device control features, application control features, filter policies, DLP solutions, and to schedule internet access.

The solution is deployed on-premises.

There are 150 people using this solution in my organization. We don't have plans to increase usage.

The most valuable features are the file activity monitors, DLP solutions, and application controls.

We are using Apple devices, and the advanced device control service doesn't work for M1 chips devices, like Apple MacBooks.

It should be more compatible with other devices.

I have used this solution for five years.

It's stable.

It's scalable, but not for Mac devices.

Setup is very easy. It can be deployed in two hours.

It can be accessed by a console system. I have a primary and secondary server, but I have merged both sides to make a single primary server.

I deployed the solution myself.

The license isn't expensive.

I would rate this solution as six out of ten.

It's basically for remote work management. We are still operating in a hybrid mode. Whatever restrictions we have to apply on the end-user laptops, we do it through Seqrite. 

There are a lot of client IT restrictions that we have to deal with. We cannot share the laptop screen, for example, or there cannot be media storage devices connected to the laptop. So all of these access controls and the endpoint governance policies are running through Seqrite.

The convenience has been great. That is the most beneficial thing, especially when we onboard someone new. 

Earlier, the IT team had to set up everything from scratch on every laptop, and even then, there was a chance of the end user being able to bypass some of those controls. 

With Seqrite, it is completely protected, and we have full control over what is happening on the end user's laptop.

As we're using the serverless version, the fully managed offering, we are able to control and change the access permissions remotely. Whenever someone has to get temporary access or anything, we do not have to install the application on our server and maintain it. We have one single login, an admin login, and from there, we can change the permissions and access controls for a number of end-user devices.

The deployment was fast.

The solution is stable so far.

It's pretty affordable. 

User management could be improved. For example, if you have to create different types of user groups based on what kind of access they would need, that should be easier. We keep standard rules for certain profiles. The user management is not that good currently, and so we have trouble with handling user management.

Once the client is installed, then we can control it. However, the initial setup should be managed completely in mobile mode. For example, if a laptop is delivered directly from the vendor to an employee and we can trigger the command from a central place to install the client and run the standard installations as well, that would make things easier.

I'm a bit concerned about the responsiveness of support.

I've been using the solution for 1.5 years. 

So far, the solution looks stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

It is too early to tell how well the solution will scale. We have not yet scaled it to a lot of users. Only five people are using it right now. That includes developers and project managers. We do plan to increase usage as our developer base expands. 

We have yet to escalate questions to technical support. However, during the procurement cycle, we did find the responsiveness lacking to some extent. They were slower than we expected. I worry that they may not be proactive if we do run into issues. 

While we did not directly use the solution, we did explore a Dell product. We read about the features, and it was very similar. We went with this solution based on the price point, and we were getting a fully managed version. Also, the IT person who was implementing it had prior experience and knew the product well. 

The solution has a short deployment cycle. It wasn't very long. In one month, we assessed different solutions available in the market, and then after comparing the price and the features available, we deployed it. The procurement time was roughly 10 days, and we implemented it in about one week. We had one person working on it full-time with guidance from me. It doesn't take many people to deploy and maintain it. This is the serverless version we're using, so we do not have a lot of maintenance to worry about.

Price-wise, it is quite reasonable.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten in terms of affordability.

They offer one standard license as part of a package that covers an admin and X number of users. 

Earlier, I was working with a services company. There we were resellers and distributors of these solutions. Now, I'm working with a company where we are using these tools in-house. I'm helping with the implementation in-house. Right now, the company I'm associated with is not a registered reseller.

We are using the solution. We're using the SaaS version.

The tool is still new to us, and we are taking a chance on it. However, in general, it looks good overall. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.