ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Seqrite Endpoint Security comparison

ESET and Seqrite are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. ESET is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.5, while Seqrite is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0. ESET holds a 2.5% mindshare in EPP, compared to Seqrite’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of ESET users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of Seqrite users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Seqrite Endpoint Security are robust endpoint protection solutions designed for varying business needs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform appears to have the upper hand in terms of user satisfaction and overall performance, while Seqrite Endpoint Security competes with its feature-rich solutions.

Features: ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is renowned for its comprehensive threat detection, low system impact, and effective ransomware protection. Seqrite Endpoint Security stands out with extensive vulnerability management, network security, and cloud storage protection features. Both platforms deliver strong security, but ESET’s low impact on system performance is a key advantage.

Room for Improvement: Users note ESET Endpoint Protection Platform could benefit from more straightforward reporting features and enhanced customer support. For Seqrite Endpoint Security, areas for improvement include better integration with other security tools and more frequent updates. ESET’s feedback focuses primarily on customer experience, while Seqrite’s feedback highlights functional enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ESET Endpoint Protection Platform receives positive reviews for its smooth deployment process and responsive customer service. Seqrite Endpoint Security also garners favorable deployment feedback, though some users mention occasional technical support challenges. ESET stands out slightly due to consistent, positive customer service experiences.

Pricing and ROI: ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is perceived as cost-effective with a good return on investment, though some users find the initial setup cost slightly high. Seqrite Endpoint Security is noted for being affordably priced but may require more investments in customization and integration. Despite the higher initial cost, ESET’s strong performance highlights its value over time.

To learn more, read our detailed ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.6%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is 2.5%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seqrite Endpoint Security is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.6%
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform	2.5%
Seqrite Endpoint Security	1.0%
Other	92.9%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Marko-Stojanovic

Owner at Online IT

Cloud-based protection has simplified daily client support and keeps threats under control

The problems that we are facing with policy adoption include slow adoption, as it takes more than five minutes to adopt policy on client computers. ESET Network Attack Protection sometimes helps in reducing network-level intrusions, but sometimes it prevents local devices on the network, which are well-known and good devices, from being recognized, treating them as a threat. So it requires more administration than usual. ESET could implement a good solution for remote support in ESET Endpoint Protection Platform for improvement in the future. Since you have the cloud console, ESET could have something similar to AnyDesk or TeamViewer, but from ESET.

Read full review

ManishKumar14

DGM IT at Seth Anandram Jaipuria Group of Educational Institutions

Centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use. It allows you to patch your required reports. The solution provides central deployment, remote deployment,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its ability to react to cyber data attacks is awesome."

"Cortex covers everything I need. It's a perfect solution. Cortex provides a different level of visibility because it's an extended EDR, allowing you to grab logs from the network and firewalls. Palo Alto invented the concept of the extended EDR or XDR."

"But overall, when we speak about security and protection, they are one of the top providers."

"The best feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is that it collects logs from different sections such as the endpoint, the network, and the cloud, making it easy to investigate alerts, collect some of the investigation packages related to the infected machines, and provide live response."

"We use Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks for its ability to detect based on behavior rather than simple virus scan to prevent malicious activities."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the user interface."

"The user interface of the solution is sophisticated and straightforward."

"Threat identification and detection are the most valuable features of this solution."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"I feel the solution to be beneficial in respect of features that I cannot find with SSTM's."

"The product is good for most endpoints, including laptops and desktops and works well with iOS and Windows systems."

"It really, really helps in the detection of ransomware, zero-day threats, basically anything cyber security related."

"The features seem to be alright."

"ESET Endpoint Security is highly stable."

"ESET Endpoint Security is valuable for the money spent because it is lightweight on the system, and we don't need to upgrade existing systems or resources, such as CPUs and memory, as even older systems can run efficiently or function as required."

"The solution is easy to install and configure."

"I'd recommend the solution. The security is good and it's easy to install even on an enterprise level."

More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform pros

"Endpoint Security's best features are inventory, asset management, and quick scanning."

"We were excited about the cloud-based management features of Seqrite and were looking to use the same."

"In case it works, we are looking to use features like USB blocking, file upload alerts, and other antivirus features as well, but this software has to work first."

"The solution is stable."

"The setup process was easy for our remote clients and us as well."

"The most valuable part of the solution is its ransomware backup feature."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"Seqrite Endpoint Security is a good solution."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"It's more focused on network communication. If a customer wants to increase the level of protection and start working with documents, it's impossible to integrate these features into the system. It's more of a communication-oriented system than a content security-oriented system."

"It is not very strong in terms of endpoint management. It should have additional features like DLP, encryption, or advanced device control. Currently, Cortex is good in terms of the security of the endpoints, but it is not as good as other vendors in terms of the management of the endpoint."

"In general, the price could be more competitive."

"There are a large number of false positives."

"Cortex XDR could improve its sales support team, including better commission structures and referral programs."

"The solution could improve by providing better integration with their own products and others."

"Cortex XDR could improve its sales support team, including better commission structures and referral programs."

"There is also no recovery feature; if some endpoint is under attack there must be the possibility of recovering it or restoring it to a normal state."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The adware module could be improved."

"The product could be improved by having better integration with other services."

"It can be hard to set up if you need to customize it."

"The heuristic of ESET is not so effective in standard mode."

"They could improve the solution by adding better ransomware features."

"The problem was that it didn't support Windows 7."

"The solution lacks the automation I need."

"We are looking to move towards an EDR solution rather than EPP. EDR is a solution that can dynamically detect threats based on the process behavior. It would be better if this solution was an EDR and an EPP solution, this would increase security protection."

More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform cons

"User management is not that good currently, and so we have trouble with handling user management."

"I don't feel that the scalability part of Seqrite Endpoint Security is better than the other products in the market."

"I would like to see Seqrite add a remote profile so we can implement different policies for users connecting to the in-office LAN and those accessing the office network from home or a public internet connection."

"Sometimes, small and medium businesses, or even startups with just five, ten, or fifteen systems, are also keen to secure their data. There is a reluctance on the part of the technical team to extend installation support when the opportunity sizes are smaller. Seqrite Endpoint Security has a lot of value. Still, its marketing could be done much better on a larger scale, especially in India, in light of the new DPDP 2023 Act, which the Indian Parliament passed. It would be even more valuable if Seqrite could incorporate features to help companies comply with this law, it would be even more helpful."

"The support offered by the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"When it comes to the support provided by the product, I see that Seqrite is not as mature as the other products in the market."

"The product or service could be improved by incorporating SIEM integrations to enable the collection of logs."

"User management could be improved."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

"Compared to CrowdStrike, Cortex XDR is an expensive solution."

"It is "expensive" and flexible."

"Very costly product."

"Our customers have expressed that the price is high."

"I am using the Community edition."

"It has a yearly renewal."

"I feel it is fairly priced."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"For 200 or so users, it might cost around $10,000 or so. That is for a first-time purchase. A renewal may come in at $7,000 to $8,000, or around 20% to 30% less. This is a rough estimate of what to expect."

"The price of ESET Endpoint Antivirus could be lower. From a customer's perspective, it is expensive."

"The cost is a very reasonable. When compared with other products, the price is low (though not very low)."

"The price is okay and I don't have any issues with it."

"There is a license needed to use the solution and the price depends on the features you want to use. The overall price is reasonable."

"The license is annually, and the price is low compared to competitors."

"The pricing is pretty good."

"The pricing can be a bit more flexible."

More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform pricing and cost advice

"I give the cost of the solution a seven out of ten."

"The solution has reasonable pricing. There is one pricing without any hidden charges. They have to pay once a year or three years."

"Endpoint Security is cheaper than Trend Micro."

"We pay approximately $1,500 for licenses for the solution."

"It is a cheaply priced product."

"My company needs to purchase a yearly subscription for the licensing costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security."

"You need to pay for a yearly license for Seqrite Endpoint Security, which is expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

15%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	45
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	48

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	18
Large Enterprise	21

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ESET LiveGuard Advanced?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform are good with no issues. The price is ver...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ESET LiveGuard Advanced?

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform could be improved by offering integrations and user-friendly dashboards that could ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ESET LiveGuard Advanced?

My main use case for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is preventing malware and preventing outside attackers. When a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security?

The solution's pricing is good for us, where it is neither cheap nor expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seqrite Endpoint Security?

The solution's integration capabilities are moderate and could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

HP Wolf Security vs ESET Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs ESET Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 3% of the time

WatchGuard EPDR vs ESET Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 3% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs ESET Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 3% of the time

AhnLab MDS vs ESET Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Competitors

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

Sophos Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Seqrite Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

May 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform

May 2026

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform report

Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Seqrite Endpoint Security

April 2026

Download Seqrite Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Smart Security, ESET PROTECT Advanced, ESET LiveGuard Advanced, ESET PROTECT Platform

Seqrite End Point Security, Seqrite EPS

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive security with minimal CPU and RAM impact, effective malware protection, and seamless updates, making it ideal for organizations needing reliable digital security.

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is highly regarded for its effective ThreatSense technology, advanced firewall, and central control capabilities. Users benefit from its lightweight design and efficient notification system, enjoying customizable management through its management console. Despite its strengths, there are opportunities to enhance malware repair, update processes, and AI integration. The platform's compatibility across operating systems and integration with systems like ESET PROTECT allows organizations to effectively secure endpoints and servers against threats like malware, viruses, and ransomware.

What are the key features of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform?

Minimal CPU and RAM Impact: Designed for efficient use of resources.
ThreatSense Technology: Provides reliable threat detection and response.
Advanced Firewall: Offers enhanced network security.
Central Control: Allows for organized management from a single point.
Cloud Integration: Seamlessly integrates with cloud services for expanded functionality.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Malware Protection: Ensures effective defense against diverse threats.
Seamless Updates: Facilitates stress-free upgrading to maintain security.
Lightweight and Efficient: Provides strong security without compromising system performance.
Customizable Management: Allows for tailored security management to suit specific needs.
Affordable Pricing: Offers value-driven pricing without compromising on protection quality.

Organizations deploy ESET Endpoint Protection Platform to safeguard laptops, desktops, and servers from cyber threats. Its use extends to antivirus protection, firewall configuration, and network monitoring. Companies often integrate it with ESET PROTECT and Apache HTTP Proxy for optimized management and updates, making it a versatile choice in industries requiring robust endpoint security.

ESET

Seqrite Endpoint Security provides comprehensive endpoint protection with features like inventory management, antivirus defense, and ransomware prevention. It ensures seamless device and application control, offering centralized management for hybrid environments across Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Seqrite Endpoint Security, known for its centralized management system, is designed to safeguard endpoints with advanced antivirus, malware detection, and ransomware prevention capabilities. It facilitates effective governance for hybrid work environments, providing robust inventory and asset management. While offering advanced device and application control across Windows, Mac, and Linux, Seqrite integrates XDR and EDR functionalities along with web protection and policy implementation.

What are the key features of Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Inventory and Asset Management: Track and manage hardware and software assets effectively.
Ransomware Backup: Provides backups to secure data against ransomware attacks.
Advanced EDR and XDR: Offers extended and endpoint detection and response.
File Monitoring: Monitors file activities to ensure data integrity.
External Device Control: Manages device usage and access.
Web Protection: Safeguards against online threats with secure browsing.
DLP Features: Monitors data access and usage to prevent data loss.

What benefits should be looked for?

Ease of Management: Streamlined management with a user-friendly interface.
Policy Implementation: Fast and effective application of security policies.
Cost-Effective Plans: Provides affordable options for varied businesses.
Centralized Management: Simplifies the management of multiple devices.

In industries like IT, healthcare, and finance, Seqrite Endpoint Security finds usage for securing endpoint devices and ensuring compliance with industry standards. Its centralized cloud-based management supports robust access control and governance, suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises in managing endpoint security challenges.

Seqrite

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

ERSTE Group Bank, Miller Solutions, Wesleyan University, The Hospital Center of Luxembourg, Deer Valley USD, SPAR, Industrial Federal Credit Union, Honda, City Hall of Palmela, Hays CISD, Lester B Pearson School Board

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries

Buyer's Guide

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

April 2026

Free Report: ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.